检察官办案责任制改革背景下检委会制度的完善

发布时间：2019-05-12 15:14

【摘要】：在新一轮司法体制改革背景下,作为检察权运行机制改革重要举措之一的检察官办案责任制正在各试点地区全力推进落实。检察官办案责任制的中心内容是突出检察官在履行司法职能时的主体地位,最显著的特征是主体地位的突出化、办案组织的司法化、人员的精英化、司法的专业化、管理的扁平化。然而随着办案责任制改革的不断推进,现行检委会制度由于其自身体制缺陷的限制,逐渐与主任检察官办案组间产生矛盾。主要表现为:一是检委会制度的相关法律规定与检察官办案责任制的要求相脱节;二是检委会的限权本质与检察官办案责任制的放权要求相冲突;三是检委会的问责机制缺失与检察官案件责任终身负责制相违背;四是检委会委员专业化水平与检察官专业化的要求有差距;五是检委会决策行政化与检察官办案司法化相矛盾。为科学理顺二者间关系,笔者认为有必要在坚持法治、各司其职、相互配合及逐步放权等原则的基础上,实现二者顺利衔接,并通过健全检委会的有关立法、加强检委会专业化、制度化、规范化等工作机制的建设,最终实现1+12的效果,为新形势下检察工作的需要产生更大的合力。
[Abstract]:Under the background of the new round of judicial system reform, as one of the important measures to reform the operation mechanism of procuratorial power, the responsibility system of handling cases by prosecutors is being carried out in all pilot areas. The central content of the procurator's case handling responsibility system is to highlight the principal position of the procurator in the performance of judicial functions. The most prominent characteristics are the salience of the subject status, the judicialization of the case handling organization, the elitism of the personnel, and the specialization of the judicature. The flattening of management. However, with the continuous progress of the reform of the case handling responsibility system, the current prosecution committee system has gradually contradicted the chief prosecutor's handling team because of the limitation of its own system defects. The main manifestations are as follows: first, the relevant legal provisions of the prosecution committee system are out of touch with the requirements of the procurator case responsibility system, the second is that the limited nature of the prosecution committee conflicts with the decentralization requirements of the procurator handling case responsibility system; Third, the lack of accountability mechanism of the prosecution committee is contrary to the system of lifelong responsibility for prosecutors' cases, fourth, there is a gap between the professional level of the members of the prosecution committee and the requirements of the professionalization of prosecutors. Fifth, the administrative decision-making of the prosecution committee contradicts the judicial handling of cases by prosecutors. In order to straighten out the relationship between the two scientifically, the author believes that it is necessary to realize the smooth connection between the two on the basis of adhering to the principles of the rule of law, performing their respective duties, cooperating with each other and gradually decentralizing power, and adopting the relevant legislation of the prosecution committee. Strengthen the construction of professional, institutionalized and standardized working mechanism of the procuratorial committee, and finally realize the effect of 112, so as to produce greater joint force for the need of procuratorial work under the new situation.
【学位授予单位】：江西财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D926.3

【参考文献】