电子诉讼形塑的中国策略

发布时间：2019-06-04 23:48

【摘要】：电子诉讼是"智慧法院"工程输出的制度化产物。改革试验中,进化论理性主义催生的试验立法进路,为立法官决策供给了多元信息及地方创新经验,在掌控改革风险、节约改革成本、缓解推行阻力等方面克服了"非实践性"制度变迁的弊端。最高法院凭借其政治权威,倚赖司法会议机制、精英话语权及强科层制组织结构,自上而下以"司法文件"为中介,动员地方法院分解量化其任务,司法官为追逐组织俸禄而趋向义务的履行。期间,各级法院充分运用典型报道之外部策略,传播信息化成效以赢得民众的内心认同。此项改革在寻求法理论证的过程中,也善于将政治期许、民众接纳度作为缓和正当性论争的手段。这些非正式但高度制度化的做法在一定意义上凝结为电子诉讼形塑的中国
[Abstract]:Electronic litigation is the institutionalized product of the output of the Wisdom Court project. In the reform experiment, the experimental legislative approach spawned by evolutionary rationalism provides multiple information and local innovation experience for the decision-making of judges, controls the risk of reform and saves the cost of reform. To alleviate the resistance to implementation and other aspects to overcome the drawbacks of "non-practical" institutional change. By virtue of its political authority, the Supreme Court relies on the mechanism of the Judicial Council, the right to speak of the elite and the organizational structure of the strong section, and mobilizes the District Court to decompose and quantify its tasks from top to bottom, using the "judicial documents" as the intermediary. Judges tend to perform their obligations in pursuit of organizational salaries. During this period, courts at all levels made full use of the external strategies of typical reports to disseminate the effectiveness of information technology in order to win the inner identity of the people. In the process of seeking legal argumentation, this reform is also good at taking political expectation and public acceptance as a means to ease the debate about legitimacy. These informal but highly institutionalized practices condense into China, which is shaped by electronic litigation in a sense.
【作者单位】：海南师范大学法学院
【基金】：2013年国家社科基金项目“我国转型社会中的法治思维研究”(13BFX010) 2017年海南省哲学社会科学规划课题“‘互联网+’时代电子法院构建研究”HNSK(ZC17-9)的阶段成果海南师范大学教授(博士)科研启动资助项目“司法指导性文件研究”
【分类号】：D926.2

【相似文献】