论司法能动注意在我国的适用

发布时间：2019-06-18 12:28

【摘要】：司法能动主义能否在我国适用,从其传入我国起争论就从未停止过。在司法改革的过程中我们面临着各种各样的理论选择。对理论的选择,我们应当抱着谨慎的态度。本文是从我国实际情况出发对司法能动主义在我国的适用进行研究,重点关注适用的必要性与不可能性以及对司法能动主义的借鉴。第一章,导论,介绍选题意义,研究现状和本文的研究方法与结构安排。第二章,首先理清前人对司法能动主义概念的论述,总结司法能动主义的特征,归纳美国和我国围绕司法能动主义的不同观点,以及司法能动主义在美国的实践经验,对司法能动主义有一个基本的认识。第三章,分析司法能动主义在我国适用的必要性,即分别从司法的内因—司法本身和外因—司法与社会的互动两个方面来分析,认为我国确实需要引入司法能动主义。第四章,分析司法能动主义在我国的可行性,分别从司法独立、法官个人素质、社会接受程度三个方面进行考察,认为目前我国并没有适合司法能动主义存在的环境,对司法能动主义的使用应当逐步实施。总结,第五章,在第四章的基础上,作者认为虽然司法能动主义在我国没有使用的土壤,但是我们可以从中借鉴有益的方面,既提高法官独立性和个人素质,加强普法教育。逐步为适用司法能动主义创造环境。
[Abstract]:Whether judicial activism can be applied in our country has never stopped since it was introduced into our country. In the process of judicial reform, we are faced with a variety of theoretical choices. We should take a cautious attitude towards the choice of theory. Based on the actual situation of our country, this paper studies the application of judicial activism in our country, focusing on the necessity and impossibility of application and the reference of judicial activism. The first chapter, introduction, introduces the significance of the topic, the research status and the research methods and structure of this paper. The second chapter, first of all, clarifies the previous discussion on the concept of judicial activism, summarizes the characteristics of judicial activism, sums up the different views of the United States and our country around judicial activism, as well as the practical experience of judicial activism in the United States, and has a basic understanding of judicial activism. The third chapter analyzes the necessity of the application of judicial activism in our country, that is, from two aspects: the internal cause of justice itself and the interaction between justice and society, and holds that judicial activism is really necessary in our country. The fourth chapter analyzes the feasibility of judicial activism in our country, respectively from the judicial independence, the personal quality of judges, and the degree of social acceptance. it is considered that there is no suitable environment for judicial activism in our country at present, and the use of judicial activism should be implemented step by step. In conclusion, the fifth chapter, on the basis of the fourth chapter, the author thinks that although judicial activism is not used in our country, we can draw lessons from it, which can not only improve the independence and personal quality of judges, but also strengthen the education of popularizing the law. Gradually create an environment for the application of judicial activism.
【学位授予单位】：西北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D926

【相似文献】