关于死刑复核程序检察监督的可行性分析
发布时间：2019-06-25 19:17
【摘要】：虽然我国已将死刑核准权收归于最高人民法院行使,但我国法律对死刑复核程序仍然没有详细的、可操作的规定,复核机构设置的单一性使死刑复核权得不到制衡和监督,程序运行的正当性受到质疑。死刑复核权的回收只是权力行使者的级别的提高,但权力的运行的程序和规则更为重要。为完善死刑复核程序,我国司法界及学者们也在不断探究改革和完善的新思路、新方法。笔者在本文通过分析死刑复核程序缺陷,论证检察监督法理基础,并为其寻找可靠宪法和法律依据,提出死刑复核程序检察监督过程中应当遵循的指导理念和基本原则,以及应当妥当处理好的各种关系,在此基础上提出实行死刑复核程序检察监督的可行性建议。
[Abstract]:Although the right to approve the death penalty has been attributed to the Supreme people's Court in our country, there are still no detailed and operable provisions in the law of our country on the procedure of death penalty review. The singleness of the review organization makes the right of death penalty review unchecked and supervised, and the legitimacy of the procedure operation is questioned. The recovery of the right to review the death penalty is only the improvement of the level of the emissary of power, but the procedures and rules of the operation of power are more important. In order to perfect the procedure of death penalty review, the judicial circles and scholars in our country are also exploring the new ideas and methods of reform and perfection. Based on the analysis of the defects of the procedure of death penalty review, the author demonstrates the legal basis of procuratorial supervision, and finds a reliable constitutional and legal basis for it, puts forward the guiding ideas and basic principles that should be followed in the process of procuratorial supervision of death penalty review procedure, and puts forward various relations that should be properly dealt with. On this basis, the author puts forward some feasible suggestions for carrying out the procuratorial supervision of death penalty review procedure.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D925.2;D926.34
本文编号：2505937
[Abstract]:Although the right to approve the death penalty has been attributed to the Supreme people's Court in our country, there are still no detailed and operable provisions in the law of our country on the procedure of death penalty review. The singleness of the review organization makes the right of death penalty review unchecked and supervised, and the legitimacy of the procedure operation is questioned. The recovery of the right to review the death penalty is only the improvement of the level of the emissary of power, but the procedures and rules of the operation of power are more important. In order to perfect the procedure of death penalty review, the judicial circles and scholars in our country are also exploring the new ideas and methods of reform and perfection. Based on the analysis of the defects of the procedure of death penalty review, the author demonstrates the legal basis of procuratorial supervision, and finds a reliable constitutional and legal basis for it, puts forward the guiding ideas and basic principles that should be followed in the process of procuratorial supervision of death penalty review procedure, and puts forward various relations that should be properly dealt with. On this basis, the author puts forward some feasible suggestions for carrying out the procuratorial supervision of death penalty review procedure.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D925.2;D926.34
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 万毅;林喜芬;;现代刑事诉讼法的“帝王"原则:程序法定原则重述[J];当代法学;2006年01期
2 韩红;杨春雷;;论死刑复核程序中检察机关的职能[J];中国司法;2006年09期
3 上海市人民检察院第一分院课题组;胡敏;柯葛壮;;检察机关监督死刑复核程序的制度构建[J];法学;2006年09期
4 白建云;;论检察机关参与死刑复核程序的法理依据[J];中国检察官;2008年04期
5 陈国庆;石献智;;检察机关参与死刑复核程序的几个问题[J];人民检察;2006年11期
6 姜素红;程序正义及其价值分析[J];湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2005年01期
7 刘根菊;死刑复核程序的正当性及程序完善构想[J];政法论丛;2005年04期
，本文编号：2505937
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2505937.html
