论公司归入权之缘起及其理论基础

发布时间：2018-01-16 11:42

本文关键词：论公司归入权之缘起及其理论基础　出处：《北京工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2010年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：针对公司归人权既是证券法亦是公司法上的一项制度,指出二者虽有一定的共通性,但在制度层面存有明显不同,这缘于它们在产生背景和价值取向等深层次方面存有差异,因此不能一味追求二者在制度层面的融合。通过历史的分析方法,可以发现:前者主要为了吓阻内幕人员从事内幕交易,维持投资人信心,维护证券市场秩序;后者旨在促使公司负责人行使其对公司所负之忠实义务。就共通性而言,在两种制度中,公司均得以成为归人权的享有主体,其依据在于公司负责人(内幕人员)对公司负有忠实义务,公司归人权亦可谓信托法上之"归人权"的具体演绎。
[Abstract]:In view of the fact that the human rights of companies is not only a system of securities law but also a system of company law, it is pointed out that although there is certain commonality between them, there are obvious differences in system level. This is because they have differences in the background and value orientation, so they can not blindly pursue the integration of the two in the institutional level, through the historical analysis method. It can be found that: the former mainly to deter insider trading, maintain investor confidence, and maintain the order of the securities market; The latter aims to promote the corporate leaders to exercise their obligations of loyalty to the company. In terms of commonality, in both systems, the company is able to become the subject of the enjoyment of human rights. Its basis lies in the company responsible person (insider personnel) has the faithful duty to the company, the company belongs to the human rights also may be regarded as the concrete deduction of the trust law "belongs to the human rights".
【作者单位】：西南政法大学经济法学院;
【分类号】：D922.291.91
【正文快照】： 正如著名经济学家诺思所言，历史之所以重要，不仅在于我们可以从历史中获取知识，还在于种种社会制度的连续性把现在、未来与过去连接在了一起，，将制度与历史结合，我们可以得到更合乎逻辑的解释川。公司归人权既是证券法亦是公司法上的一项制度，尽管均统摄于“公司归人权

【参考文献】