有限公司隐名投资法律问题研究

发布时间：2018-01-23 02:49

  本文关键词： 有限公司 隐名投资 显名股东 股东资格　出处：《西南政法大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：隐名投资纠纷是现今股权纠纷的主要表现形式之一,其纠纷发生的频率之高、数量之大,足以引起理论和实务领域的高度关注。由于我国缺乏关于隐名投资的法律规定,虽然最高人民法院关于适用《中华人民共和国公司法》若干问题的规定(三)(一下简称《公司法》司法解释三)中对隐名投资中隐名投资者与显名股东的关系问题做了一定的规范,但是隐名投资纠纷的解决过程中混乱的局面仍然没有改变,各执一词、各说各理,造成了隐名投资纠纷解决过程中股东资格的认定缺乏统一的观点,各股东的利益也很难得到周全的保护。隐名投资是我国社会主义市场经济的重要组成部分,其投资方式的灵活多变以及融资的方便有效使得隐名投资的存在具有重要的意义。我国法律没有对隐名投资进行明确的规定,一方面影响社会主义法律体系的完整,另一方面也影响着我国市场经济的健康发展。本文试图从隐名投资股东资格认定的混面局面中理清一个有效的认定方法,使得隐名投资问题得到更加合理的解决。 本文分为五个部分展开论述： 第一部分,从一个真实的案例入手,在阐述案例的过程中对案例的争议焦点做了系统的分析,并由此引出本文的论述重点：隐名投资的股东资格认定。 第二部分,从隐名投资的概念、特征以及形成原因入手进行基本理论的阐述。在这部分中,通过对隐名投资基本理论的阐述,使得对隐名投资有一个初步的认识和界定。笔者通过对隐名投资概念不同观点的分析,得出了关于隐名投资自己的观点,即隐名投资不是一种法律现象,而是一个投资行为。 第三部分,从隐名投资股东资格认定的标准和意义入手,系统阐述了关于隐名投资的各种观点：否定说、肯定说和折衷说,并对隐名投资股东资格认定的标准及其原则进行了比较全面的阐述。通过这一章的论述,我们对隐名投资股东资格的认定问题有了更深层次的认识。 第四部分,从隐名投资股东资格认定的基本理念入手,全面分析了理论和实务界关于隐名投资股东资格认定中存在的问题,并提出了隐名投资股东资格认定中应遵循的基本原则和具体的认定办法,并对本文的案例进行了具体的分析。 第五部分,文章最后,笔者以提出隐名投资股东资格认定应按照合同的有关规定处理,并认为《合同法》的相关规定是解决目前隐名投资问题的最有效的办法。
[Abstract]:Dormant investment dispute is one of the main forms of present equity disputes, and the frequency and quantity of these disputes are high and large. Enough to attract theoretical and practical attention. Due to the lack of legal provisions on anonymous investment in China. Although the provisions of the Supreme people's Court concerning the application of the Company Law of the people's Republic of China (III). In this paper, the relationship between anonymous investors and explicit shareholders is regulated. However, the chaotic situation in the process of settlement of anonymous investment disputes has not changed. They insist on their own words and say different reasons, which results in the lack of a unified view on the identification of shareholders' qualifications in the process of settlement of anonymous investment disputes. The interests of the shareholders are also difficult to be fully protected. Anonymous investment is an important part of our socialist market economy. Because of its flexible investment mode and convenient and effective financing, the existence of hidden investment is of great significance. The law of our country does not have a clear regulation on hidden investment. On the one hand, it affects the integrity of the socialist legal system, on the other hand, it also affects the healthy development of our market economy. So that anonymous investment problem has been more reasonable solution. This paper is divided into five parts: In the first part, starting from a real case, the author makes a systematic analysis of the controversial focus of the case in the process of expounding the case, and leads to the emphases of this paper: the shareholder qualification determination of anonymous investment. The second part, from the concept of anonymous investment, characteristics and reasons for the formation of the basic theory. In this part, through the basic theory of anonymous investment elaboration. Through the analysis of the different viewpoints of the concept of anonymous investment, the author obtains his own point of view on anonymous investment, that is, anonymous investment is not a legal phenomenon. It's an investment act. The third part, starting with the criteria and significance of the qualification of dormant investment shareholders, systematically expounds the various views on anonymous investment: negation, affirmation and compromise. Through the discussion of this chapter, we have a deeper understanding of the qualification of dormant investment shareholders. In the 4th part, starting with the basic concept of the qualification recognition of dormant investment shareholders, the paper comprehensively analyzes the problems existing in the qualification of dormant investment shareholders in the theoretical and practical circles. The paper also puts forward the basic principles and specific methods to be followed in the qualification determination of dormant investment shareholders, and makes a concrete analysis of the case in this paper. At the end of the article, the author proposes that the qualification of dormant investment shareholders should be dealt with according to the relevant provisions of the contract. It is considered that the relevant provisions of contract Law are the most effective way to solve the problem of anonymous investment.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【参考文献】

中国期刊全文数据库 前9条

1 王成勇,陈广秀;隐名股东之资格认定若干问题探析[J];法律适用;2004年07期

2 韩晔;;隐名股东的法律地位及其立法构想[J];法制与社会;2010年08期

3 石育斌;毛燕琼;;如何认定台商在大陆隐名投资的法律效力——以上海为例的探讨[J];华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2006年01期

4 柴瑞娟;;商事登记公信力研究[J];华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年04期

5 徐小平;;公司隐名投资者的法律地位分析[J];黎明职业大学学报;2005年04期

6 袁利华;;非规避法律隐名投资的类型化调整[J];石河子大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2006年06期

7 王兰;;论公司法对若干有限公司股东资格的认定[J];太平洋学报;2007年04期

8 应懋;“名为单位、实为个人”性质的认定问题[J];政治与法律;2000年06期

9 陈红;探析公司隐名投资的现状与规范[J];政治与法律;2003年01期

中国重要报纸全文数据库 前1条

1 张能宝;[N];人民法院报;2006年

中国博士学位论文全文数据库 前2条

1 孙有强;股权公示制度研究[D];中国政法大学;2005年

2 马栩生;登记公信力研究[D];武汉大学;2005年

中国硕士学位论文全文数据库 前6条

1 王旭东;浅议隐名投资[D];华东政法学院;2004年

2 袁利华;隐名投资问题研究[D];西南政法大学;2005年

3 王战伟;论违反强制性规范的契约效力[D];西南政法大学;2007年

4 蔡婷婷;隐名投资相关法律问题研究[D];华东政法学院;2007年

5 包永斌;论隐名股东的股东资格认定[D];西南政法大学;2008年

6 顾东伟;隐名股东法律地位研究[D];中国政法大学;2009年

，

本文编号：1456485