有限责任公司股东资格认定的法律问题探析

发布时间：2018-02-02 13:22

本文关键词： 股东资格证据分析认定标准新折衷主义说　出处：《华东政法大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：本文由引言、正文、结语三部分组成。正文部分分为三部分,对有限责任公司股东资格认定中的几个法律问题作了探讨。第一部分介绍了股东和股东资格的概念。对股东资格作了新的界定,认为有时是成为股东的条件,有时是股东身份。股东资格纠纷不仅发生在公司与股东之间、股东相互之间、公司与第三人之间、股东与第三人之间,特殊情形发生于公司与职工之间。股东资格认定的主体范围应当作适当扩大,有时还应是职工,有时还应是公司以外第三人。对股权的性质进行了梳理,讨论了股权在民事权利中的地位,且提出了两种归类方案。对股权权能作了简单分类,探讨了部分股权权能的限制问题,还探讨了股权变动模式。列举了股东资格的取得与丧失,重点讨论了股权的善意取得民法基础理论与构成要件,认为善意取得是与原始取得、继受取得并列的第三种股权取得方式。讨论了股东除名制度在我国的应用。第二部分探讨了包括公司章程、股东名册、出资证明书、工商登记材料、股东会决议、实际行使股东权利等作为证据在股东资格认定方面的作用。建议公司法修改必须增加相应的不履行设置股东名册义务的民事责任、行政责任、刑事责任。介绍并评述了股东资格认定的实质要件标准、形式要件标准、折衷主义标准、合同认定标准,以及内部意思自治外部工商登记说、出资兼公司确认说,并对最高院的《公司法司法解释(三)》有关股东资格认定条款加以评析。修正了折衷主义标准,对其实质要件作了扩充理解,股东会决议、出资协议、股权转让合同应作为股东资格认定的重要证据,具体案件应针对不同法律关系来确定适用合同标准或团体法,不应绝对化。提出了新的折衷主义认定标准。第三部分对企业改制中股东资格认定、违法所得出资的股东资格认定、出资瑕疵的股东资格认定、股权转让中股东资格认定问题、隐名出资对外转让股权的效力与股东资格认定、一股二卖情形下股东资格认定、冒名股东与借名股东的股东资格认定、隐名股东的股东资格认定作了一一探讨。结语部分总结了本文与以往相关著述不同之处。本文提出新的折中主义标准说,对实践中股东资格认定有一定参考价值。
[Abstract]:This paper consists of three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The text is divided into three parts and discusses several legal problems in shareholder qualification of limited liability company. The first part introduces the concept of shareholder and shareholder qualification. Sometimes it is shareholder identity. The shareholder qualification dispute not only occurs between the company and the shareholders, but also between the shareholders, the company and the third party, and between the shareholder and the third party. The special situation occurs between the company and the worker. The scope of the main body of the shareholder qualification should be expanded appropriately, sometimes it should be the worker, and sometimes it should be the third person outside the company. This paper discusses the status of equity in civil rights, and puts forward two kinds of classification schemes. It also discusses the mode of stock right change, enumerates the acquisition and loss of stockholder's qualification, discusses emphatically the basic theory and constitutive elements of the civil law of bona fide acquisition of equity, and holds that bona fide acquisition is and original acquisition. This paper discusses the application of shareholder removal system in China. The second part discusses the articles of association, the register of shareholders, the certificate of investment, the materials of business registration, and the resolution of shareholders' meeting. It is suggested that the amendment of the company law must increase the corresponding civil liability and administrative liability for failing to fulfill the obligation to set up the stockholder register. This paper introduces and comments on the essential requirements standard, formal requirement standard, eclectic standard, contract confirmation standard and internal autonomy external business registration theory of shareholder qualification. The capital contribution and company confirmed, and the Supreme Court of the "Company Law Judicial interpretation (3) > to comment on the shareholders qualification, revised the eclectic standard, to its essential elements of the expansion of understanding." Shareholders' meeting resolution, investment agreement, equity transfer contract should be an important evidence of shareholder qualification, specific cases should be based on different legal relations to determine the applicable contract standards or group law. It should not be absolute. A new eclectic criterion is proposed. The third part is about the qualification of shareholders in the reform of enterprises, the identification of shareholders' qualification of illegal income, the qualification of shareholders with defective capital contribution, and the determination of shareholders' qualification in the transfer of shares. The validity and qualification of the transfer of shares to foreign companies by anonymous capital contribution, the determination of shareholders' qualifications under the circumstances of one share and two selling, and the determination of shareholders' qualifications of impersonated shareholders and borrowed shareholders. The shareholder qualification of dormant shareholders is discussed one by one. The conclusion summarizes the differences between this paper and previous works. This paper puts forward a new eclectic standard, which has certain reference value for shareholder qualification in practice.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【参考文献】