有限责任公司股权质押效力规则的反思与重构

发布时间：2018-02-22 13:49

本文关键词： 股权质押质权目标公司出质股东质权人外资公司行政审批　出处：《中国法学》2011年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：《担保法》第78条与《担保法司法解释》第103条应予废止,股权质押合同原则上自其成立时起生效。《物权法》第226条第1款应修改为股权质权自公司股东名册记载股权出质事实起生效,工商行政部门出质登记仅具有对抗等三人的效力。股权质押合同的生效和股权质权的设定均无需遵守《公司法》第72条有关股东向公司外第三人转让股权的程序性规定。目标公司对质权人负有尊重和维护质押股权价值的义务。现行部门规章对外资公司股权质押行为采取审批生效主义的保守态度应予废除,从而将股权质押效力彻底回归合同法、物权法与公司法的轨道,最终实现内外资公司股权质押规则的统一。
[Abstract]:Article 78 of the Guaranty Law and Article 103 of the Judicial interpretation of the Guaranty Law shall be repealed, The equity pledge contract shall, in principle, take effect from the time of its establishment. Paragraph 1 of Article 226 of the Real Rights Law shall be amended to take effect from the fact that equity pledge is recorded in the register of shareholders of the company. The pledge registration of the administrative department for industry and commerce only has the effect of antagonizing the other three persons. Neither the validity of the equity pledge contract nor the establishment of the equity pledge right need to comply with the procedure of transferring the shares of shareholders to the third party outside the company in accordance with Article 72 of the Company Law. The target company has the obligation to respect and maintain the value of the pledge equity. The conservative attitude of adopting the principle of examining and approving the equity pledge of the foreign capital company should be abolished. Thus, the validity of equity pledge is completely returned to the track of contract law, property law and company law, and the unification of equity pledge rules of domestic and foreign companies is finally realized.
【作者单位】：对外经济贸易大学法学院;
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【参考文献】