论我国公司法董事注意义务之完善

发布时间：2018-02-24 15:41

本文关键词： 注意义务注意义务标准责任限制　出处：《华东政法大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：现代公司治理的一个重要特点是所有权与经营权的分离,股东不直接执行公司事物,董事负责公司的经营管理。董事作为公司的经营管理者,其是否勤勉尽责为公司最佳利益服务将对公司的命运产生重大的影响。注意义务基于董事与公司之间的关系,要求董事必须充分发挥其才能,并以处在相同位置中一般谨慎人之注意,善意地为公司最佳利益服务。本文在分析各国董事注意义务的立法状况的基础上,试图对我国公司法上董事及高级管理人员的注意义务的完善提出建议。本文共分为四章: 第一章通过介绍董事注意义务的概念、注意义务与忠实义务的关系以及注意义务所包含的内容,明确了注意义务的具体内涵,为进一步分析注意义务打下基础。第二章从理论基础和现实基础两方面出发,分析了董事注意义务的产生。理论基础着重于分析董事与公司之间的关系的各种学说及其优缺点。现实基础则关注董事的权力制约和公司治理结构完善的必要性。第三章从比较法的角度,介绍了各国董事注意义务的标准以及经营判断原则,分析了主观标准与客观标准的缺陷以及经营判断原则的价值。第四章基于以我国公司法存在的问题,提出了我国公司法上董事注意义务完善的建议:(1)确立主客观相结合的标准。(2)把董事和高级管理人员的经营管理行为分为决策权和监督权,适用不同的过错标准。行使决策权时违反注意义务的主观构成要件为重大过失,行使监督权时为一般过失。(3)通过公司章程、股东大会决议或者合同对违反注意义务的责任进行限制或免除。
[Abstract]:An important feature of modern corporate governance is the separation of ownership and management, the shareholders do not directly implement things, management board is responsible for the company's board of directors. As the leader of the company, whether due diligence for the best interest of the company service will have a significant impact on the fate of the company. Based on the relationship between attention obligation of directors and the company's requirements, the director must give full play to their talents, and to pay attention to the same person in general cautious position, good faith service for the best interests of the company. Based on the analysis of all the attention obligation of the legislative situation, suggestion to duty of care to the company law of China board of directors and senior management personnel..
This article is divided into four chapters.
The first chapter introduces the concept of the director's duty of care, the relationship between the duty of care and the duty of loyalty, the contents of the duty of care, the specific meaning of the duty of care, and lays the foundation for further analysis of the duty of care.
The second chapter from the two aspects of the theoretical basis and practical basis, analysis of the director's duty. Various theories theory focuses on the relationship between the directors and the company's analysis of its advantages and disadvantages. The realistic foundation is concerned the power restriction and perfect corporate governance structure is necessary.
The third chapter, from the perspective of comparative law, introduces the standards of directors' duty of care and the principles of business judgment, analyzes the defects of subjective and objective criteria and the value of business judgment principles.
The fourth chapter is based on the existing problems in China's company law, the company law of our country on the duty of care recommendations: (1) the establishment of a combination of subjective and objective standards. (2) the management behavior of directors and senior management personnel into the power of supervision and decision-making, apply different standards of fault. The right to exercise decision-making in violation of attention subjective elements of liability for gross negligence, the exercise of the right of supervision for general negligence. (3) by the company's articles of association, or the resolution of the general meeting of shareholders of the contract breach of duty of responsibility to exempt or limit.

【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【参考文献】