论职业经理人的法律地位

发布时间：2018-02-27 03:10

本文关键词： 职业经理人法律关系法律地位权利与义务激励与监督　出处：《西南政法大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：在现代公司治理理论的发展过程中，公司的权力中心随着社会、经济的不断发展，，从股东会到董事会在逐渐演变。现在，还处在董事会中心主义阶段。然而随着职业经理人阶层的出现和不断壮大，职业经理人在公司中扮演的角色也愈发重要，在公司中拥有的权利也日益膨胀，公司的权力中心已有逐渐向经理中心主义发展的趋势。职业经理人已不是传统公司理论上董事会的附属，唯董事会之命是从。在公司实务中，职业经理人频繁“跳槽”以及职业经理人违反经理的相关义务，利用其日益膨胀的经理权，为了自身的利益损害公司、股东及其他相关人利益的事件频发。究其原因，一方面是由于职业经理人阶层在我国产生的时间很短，职业经理人市场尚且不成熟，且没有形成职业经理人市场的自我调节机制和职业规则；另一方面也显示了我国职业经理人相关立法的缺失，现存的一部分法律已不能适应经济社会的发展，职业经理人法律地位不明确，权利义务界定模糊，激励与监督机制没有发挥效用等突出问题。因此，明确职业经理人的法律地位，科学合理地配置职业经理人的权利与义务，建立健全职业经理人的激励与监督机制必将成为今后公司理论研究领域的新课题。本文除结语外分为四个部分。以国美控制权之争案作为启发笔者写作的源泉，透过国美之争案引出一些列关于职业经理人法律地位的思考，分析了国内、外关于职业经理人法律地位的理论与立法，就我国职业经理人法律地位存在的缺陷，提出了自己的浅见，以期为职业经理人法律地位研究这一课题做出小的贡献。第一部分是研究背景—国美之争案引发的法律思考。该部分作为启发笔者写作的源泉，由国美之争案提出了过于职业经理人法律地位的相关法律思考，并提出职业经理人问题产生的根源及出路在于明确职业经理人的法律地位。第二部分是对职业经理人的概述。首先，通过对国内外关于经理、职业经理人概念的立法及理论的研究，结合我国公司法实务，对经理、职业经理人的概念了作了界定；其次，是论述了职业经理人与经理的关系，提出职业经理人是经理的特殊类型的观点；第三，是对职业经理人法律地位的概念作了界定。该部分解决了本文研究的基础性概念问题。第三部分是对职业经理人法律地位的现状的研究。要对职业经理人的法律地位进行研究，就要对职业经理人的权利与义务以及与其所处的法律关系出发去研究。本部分考察了国内外关于多元关系下职业经理人的法律地位、权利与义务等问题，为研究我国职业经理人法律地位做铺垫。第四部分是我国职业经理人法律地位的完善，也是本文的重点。分为两个大的方面.一方面对我国职业经理人法律地位相关立法规定存在的不足进行了研究；另一方面针对我国职业经理人法律地位存在的不足，从职业经理人所处法律关系、享有权利与承担义务、激励与监督机制等方面提出了相关的完善建议。
[Abstract]:In the course of the development of modern corporate governance theory , the company ' s power center has gradually evolved from the shareholders ' meeting to the board of directors with the development of society and economy . This paper divides the conclusion into four parts . As a source of the author ' s writing , the author analyzes the theory and legislation of the legal status of professional managers through the dispute case of the state and the United States , analyzes the theory and legislation of the legal status of the professional managers , and puts forward their own views on the defects of the legal status of the professional managers in China , and makes a small contribution to the research of the legal status of professional managers . The first part is the research background - the legal thought caused by the dispute case of the national beauty . The part is the source of the author ' s writing . The author puts forward the relevant legal thought about the legal status of the professional manager from the dispute case of the state and the United States , and puts forward the causes and the way out of the problem of the professional manager in defining the legal status of the professional manager . The second part is an overview of the professional managers . First , by studying the legislation and theories about managers and professional managers at home and abroad , this paper defines the concept of managers and professional managers in combination with the practice of corporate law in China . Secondly , it discusses the relationship between professional managers and managers , and puts forward that professional managers are the special types of managers . Thirdly , the concept of professional managers ' legal status is defined . The third part is to study the status quo of the legal status of professional managers . To study the legal status of professional managers , we should study the legal status , rights and obligations of professional managers at home and abroad . The fourth part is the perfection of the legal status of the professional managers in our country , and it is the focus of this paper . On the one hand , the deficiency of the legal status of the professional managers in our country is studied . On the other hand , some suggestions are put forward in terms of the legal status of the professional managers in our country , the legal relationship between the professional managers , the rights and obligations , the incentive and supervision mechanism , etc .

【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【参考文献】