我国股东代表诉讼问题探讨

发布时间：2018-03-02 23:02

本文选题：股东代表诉讼　切入点：股东直接诉讼　出处：《沈阳师范大学》2010年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：股东代表诉讼作为保护公司和保障全体股东权益的一种重要的司法救济方式,为世界上很多国家都予以重视。很多国家都在其国内实体法中确立了股东行使这项救济权利的诉讼权利,同时在程序上也相应的创建了股东代表诉讼制度。如英国、美国、澳大利亚、日本和我国台湾等国家和地区都先后在各自的商法或者公司法中对此作了明确详尽的规定,只是对这一制度所用的名称不同,一般说来,英美法系国家称其为股东派生诉讼制度,而大陆法系国家则称其为代表诉讼制度。我国的股东代表诉讼制度起步较晚,在2006年开始实施的新《公司法》中才作出初步的规定,在公司法的第150条和第152条对股东代表诉讼的股东起诉的资格、起诉事由及诉讼前置程序作出了原则性规定,其实质内容存在很多缺失,导致实践应用中出现很多的不足。通过对股东代表诉讼制度的理论研究,并借鉴其他各国股东诉讼代表诉讼制度的规定,进而剖析我国股东诉讼制度的现状及其不足,提出完善意见,以保护少数股东权益,健全公司治理结构。文章首先采用了理论联系实际、文献综述的研究方法介绍了股东代表诉讼制度的确立及其理论基础,对该制度有初步的了解与认识。接下来采用了比较研究的方法,将股东代表诉讼制度与股东直接诉讼制度进行比较,详细阐述了股东代表诉讼的特点,主要包括代表诉讼的适用范围,诉讼权利的行使方式,股东诉权的限制,权力行使目等几个方面。在论述我国股东代表诉讼制度存在的不足的同时,还比较研究了其他国家的代表诉讼制度,借鉴其合理之处。本文在采用多种研究方法的同时,还运用了演绎,分析等多种表达方式来论述股东代表诉讼制度。文章最后通过对我国诉讼代表诉讼制度的现状及其不足的分析提出了完善建议,包括规定原告股东资格,界定公司在诉讼中的地位,改进诉讼前置程序以及完善诉讼费用的担保制度。
[Abstract]:The shareholder representative litigation and protection as the protection of company interests of all shareholders an important judicial relief way, many countries in the world to pay attention to. Many countries in their domestic substantive law establishes the shareholders to exercise this right of action relief rights, at the same time in the program also created the lawsuit system. Such as Britain, America, Australia, Japan and China Taiwan and other countries and regions have in their commercial or company law which made a clear and detailed provisions, but with the name of this system is different, generally speaking, common law countries called for the shareholder derivative litigation system, and civil law the country called the representative litigation system in our country. The shareholder representative litigation system started late, before making the preliminary provisions in the new "Company Law > began in 2006, in the company law and article 150th 152 of the shareholder lawsuit on behalf of shareholder litigation, prosecution reasons and pre litigation procedure has made provisions in principle, there are many missing its substance, cause a lot of problems in practical application. Through theoretical research on the shareholder representative litigation system, and the experience of other countries in shareholder litigation litigation system, and then analyze the the status of shareholder litigation and its shortcomings, put forward suggestions, in order to protect the interests of minority shareholders, improve the corporate governance structure.
Firstly, using the theory with practice, the research methods of literature review introduced the establishment of shareholder representative litigation system and its theoretical basis, have the preliminary understanding and the understanding of the system. Then using the method of comparative study, the shareholder representative litigation system and the shareholder direct litigation system, expounds the characteristics of Shareholder Representative litigation the scope includes representative litigation, exercise of litigation rights, shareholders the right to appeal, the exercise of power. Several aspects. It discusses the existing in the shareholder litigation is not enough at the same time, also a comparative study of other countries on behalf of the litigation system, from a rational point. This paper uses many kinds of research at the same time, but also the use of the deduction, analysis and other expressions to describe the shareholder representative litigation system.
Finally, through the analysis of the status quo and shortcomings of our litigation representative litigation system, we put forward suggestions for improvement, including stipulate the qualification of plaintiff shareholders, define the company's status in litigation, improve the prelitigation procedure and improve the guarantee system of litigation costs.

【学位授予单位】：沈阳师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【参考文献】