合意原则何以对决多数决——公司合同理论本土化迷思解析

发布时间：2018-03-05 11:40

本文选题：公司合同理论　切入点：本土化迷思　出处：《法学》2011年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：公司合同理论作为公司法律经济学的重要分支,一经引介,即在我国大行其道。不过,国内法学界有人主张借以改变公司议事规则,以合意原则取代多数决议,致使公司法理论研究走入误区,公司纠纷裁判实践陷于混乱。公司合同理论出现如此本土化迷思,其根源在于学界未能厘清该理论的多重含义,甚至从公司就是合同束的理解出发,推导出合意原则取代多数决的结论。其实,一人公司并无合同关系的基础;多元投资公司的意思形成机制必然趋向民主化。作为公司冲突权利主体长期博弈均衡的多数决原则,已经构成公司设立及运行的基础,不能轻易改变。全体股东一致同意的表决结果,也只能视为多数决的一个特例。
[Abstract]:As an important branch of corporate law and economics, the theory of corporate contract is popular in our country once introduced. However, some people in domestic legal circles advocate changing the rules of procedure of companies and replacing most resolutions with the principle of agreement. As a result, the theoretical research of company law goes into the wrong zone and the practice of adjudication of company disputes is in confusion. The root of the misconception of the theory of company contract lies in the failure of the academic circles to clarify the multiple meanings of the theory. Even starting from the understanding that the company is the contract bundle, the conclusion that the principle of agreement replaces the majority decision is deduced. In fact, the one-man company does not have the basis of the contractual relationship; The formation mechanism of the will of multiple investment companies is bound to be democratized. As the principle of majority decision of the long-term game equilibrium of the subject of corporate conflict rights, it has already formed the foundation for the establishment and operation of the company. A vote agreed upon by all shareholders can only be regarded as a special case of majority decision.
【作者单位】：南京大学法学院;
【基金】：南京大学“985工程”二期哲学社会科学创新基地特别项目“经济全球化与中日民商法互动关系”(编号:010522430502) 江苏省法学会“国际金融危机背景下公司纠纷司法应对策略研究”(编号:SFH2009A08)的部分研究成果
【分类号】：D912.29

【参考文献】