论我国派生诉讼主体的完善

发布时间：2018-03-25 10:06

本文选题：派生诉讼　切入点：利益相关人　出处：《福州大学》2010年硕士论文

【摘要】：派生诉讼制度对于完善公司治理结构、利益相关人的权利保护具有不可替代的作用。自从诞生以后，受到了很多国家的重视，，也不断的得到发展。我国《公司法》吸收了国外的先进经验，引进了这一制度。但是，对这一制度的规定却不尽完整，有很多值得商榷之处。尤其是关于派生诉讼主体的规定，存在着较大的漏洞。本文通过对派生诉讼主体存在的问题进行全面的分析，为派生诉讼主体的完善提出了建议。全文分为引言、正文、结语三个部分。引言从我国的现行规定和国内外的研究现状出发，分析了其中存在的问题，明确了本文的研究对象，说明了本文的选题原因。正文共有三个部分。第一部分主要是论述原告资格的完善。首先从我国《公司法》的现行规定入手，指出目前规定存在的缺陷，主要是没有将公司职工、银行债权人和可转换债券持有人列为原告。随后从“股东至上理论”思维的禁锢、对利益相关者理论及法经济学“契约理论”的漠视和对恶意诉讼的过分担心三个方面详细分析了作出这样规定的原因。最后，对存在的问题，提出了相应的完善对策。第二部分则是围绕着被告资格的完善进行了论述。首先指出了确立被告资格的基本原则。从这个基本原则出发，说明我国派生诉讼中对被告资格的规定存在缺陷，其范围过于宽泛。然后从我国立法习惯和立法技术的影响、对派生诉讼的功能认识不清两个方面分析了存在问题的原因。最后，针对存在的问题，指出我国应该对《公司法》中的“他人”作出限制性的解释，严格限制被告的范围。第三部分讨论了公司在派生诉讼中的地位问题。首先从传统民事诉讼法当事人理论的限制和我国“重实体”“轻程序”的立法传统两个方面出发分析了为什么我国没有对公司在派生诉讼中的地位作出规定。然后分析了公司参加诉讼的必要性，最后指出应该给予公司在派生诉讼中无独立请求权第三人的地位，但是同时也应该对其做出限制性的规定，以利于其更好的发挥作用。结语部分则对全文进行了总结，阐明了本文的主要观点，并对可能存在的不足作了说明。
[Abstract]:Derivative litigation system plays an irreplaceable role in perfecting the corporate governance structure and protecting the rights of stakeholders. Since its birth, it has been attached great importance to by many countries. The Company Law of our country has absorbed the advanced experience of foreign countries and introduced this system. However, the regulations on this system are incomplete, and there are many questionable points, especially the provisions on the subject of derivative litigation. This paper makes a comprehensive analysis of the problems of derivative litigation subjects and puts forward some suggestions for the improvement of derivative litigation subjects. The full text is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The introduction analyzes the existing problems from the current regulations of our country and the current research situation at home and abroad, and clarifies the research object of this paper. This paper explains the reason of this paper. There are three parts in the text. The first part mainly discusses the perfection of the plaintiff's qualification. First of all, starting from the current provisions of the Company Law of China, it points out the defects of the present regulations, mainly because the employees of the company are not employed. Bank creditors and convertible bondholders are listed as plaintiffs. This paper analyzes in detail the reasons for this stipulation from three aspects: the disregard of stakeholder theory and the "contract theory" of law and economics, and the excessive fear of malicious litigation. Finally, the author puts forward the corresponding perfect countermeasures to the existing problems. The second part discusses the perfection of the defendant's qualification. Firstly, it points out the basic principle of establishing the defendant's qualification. From this basic principle, it shows that there are some defects in the stipulation of the defendant's qualification in the derivative litigation in our country. The scope is too broad. Then, from the influence of legislative habits and legislative techniques in China, the author analyzes the causes of the problems from two aspects: the function of derivative litigation is not clear, and finally, aiming at the existing problems, It is pointed out that our country should make a restrictive interpretation of "others" in Company Law and strictly limit the scope of the defendant. The third part discusses the status of the company in the derivative litigation. Firstly, it analyzes why we are from two aspects: the limitation of the theory of the parties in the traditional civil procedure law and the legislative tradition of "attaching importance to substance" and "neglecting the procedure" in our country. China does not regulate the status of the company in derivative litigation. Then it analyzes the necessity for the company to participate in the proceedings. Finally, it points out that the company should be given the status of the third party without independent claim in derivative litigation, but at the same time, it should also make restrictive provisions in order to play a better role. The conclusion summarizes the full text, clarifies the main points of this paper, and explains the possible shortcomings.
【学位授予单位】：福州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【参考文献】