我国公司的法律形态研究

发布时间：2018-04-27 15:21

  本文选题：公司法律形态模式 + 开放性　； 参考：《天津师范大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：摘要：我国公司法自生效至今,虽经多次修改,但一直保持着大陆法系国家传统的公司分类模式。在我国,有限公司与股份公司是公司的基本分类。但是,随着金融资本市场的不断发展,商事实践向纵深层次、更广领域拓展,我国公司法律形态的基本分类已经难与经济发展步调相一致。本文在深度剖析目前我国公司法律形态分类的基础上,从立法等角度提出建设性意见。本文主要分为四部分： 文章第一部分主要讲述股份公司与有限公司的历史,理解这二类公司出现的必然性。然后,对世界的公司法律形态分类模式进行解读——主要从学理与法律角度。最后,通过翻阅文献,归纳出我国的公司分类。 文章第二部分从法律适用角度,分析我国现行公司法律形态分类存在的问题。一方面,有限公司的部分规定也可以适用闭锁型股份公司,比如有限公司股东查阅公司会计账簿权。但是,非上市股份公司股东却没有此权。另一方面,股份公司的部分规定也可以被有限公司参照适用,比如股份公司的累积投票制。虽然有限公司股东拥有较高自治权,但是如果公司股东不能达成一致,累积投票制可以弥补有限公司机制不健全导致的漏洞。 文章第三部分从世界两大法系视角,介绍世界各国的公司法律形态模式。大陆法系国家与英美法系国家相比,公司法律形态模式各异；在大陆法系或英美法系国家之间,公司法律形态模式也存在着差异。通过介绍世界各国的法律模式,我们可以借鉴其长处以促进我国公司法的完善。 文章第四部分通过前文的分析,进一步对我国的公司法律形态模式完善提出建设性意见。2013年国务院召开会议,一些公司法改革措施相继出台。这些改革让我们看到了公司法律形态模式分类问题所在,找到了改革的方向所在。所谓“牵一发而动全身”,公司法律形态模式分类不仅在立法方面带来革新,而且开创公司法体系新局面。最后,笔者提出了自己对立法、公司法体系等的一些看法。 总之,本人想通过此文章剖析现行公司法律形态模式存在的问题,进而分析其原因所在,最终提出自己的建设性意见,以早日促进我国公司法日臻完善。
[Abstract]:Abstract: the company law of our country has been revised many times since it came into effect, but it has maintained the traditional company classification mode in the countries of civil law system. In our country, the limited company and the stock company are the basic classification of the company. However, with the continuous development of the financial capital market, the commercial practice has expanded to a deeper level and a wider range of fields, the basic classification of corporate legal forms in China has been difficult to keep pace with the pace of economic development. Based on the deep analysis of the classification of corporate legal forms in China, this paper puts forward some constructive suggestions from the angle of legislation and so on. This paper is divided into four parts: The first part of the article mainly describes the history of stock companies and limited companies, understanding the inevitability of the emergence of these two companies. Then, it interprets the classification model of corporate legal form in the world-mainly from the angle of theory and law. Finally, by looking through the literature, we conclude the classification of companies in our country. The second part analyzes the problems existing in the classification of corporate law form from the perspective of legal application. On the one hand, some provisions of limited companies can also be applied to locked-in-stock companies, such as limited shareholders to access the company's accounting books. However, non-listed shareholders do not have this right. On the other hand, some of the company's rules can also be applied by limited companies, such as the stock company's cumulative voting system. Although limited company shareholders have higher autonomy, if the shareholders can not reach agreement, the cumulative voting system can make up the loopholes caused by the imperfect mechanism of limited company. The third part of the article from the perspective of the world's two legal systems, introduces the world's corporate legal patterns. Compared with the common law countries, the civil law countries have different corporate legal patterns, and there are also differences between the civil law countries and the common law countries. By introducing the legal models of various countries in the world, we can draw lessons from their strengths to promote the perfection of our company law. The fourth part of the article, through the above analysis, further puts forward constructive suggestions on the perfection of the corporate law pattern in our country. In 2013, the State Council held a meeting, and some company law reform measures came out one after another. These reforms let us see the problem of corporate legal pattern classification and find the direction of the reform. The classification of corporate legal pattern not only brings innovation in legislation, but also creates a new situation of company law system. Finally, the author puts forward his own views on legislation, company law system and so on. In a word, I would like to analyze the problems existing in the current corporate law pattern through this article, and then analyze the reasons, and finally put forward my own constructive suggestions, in order to promote the improvement of our company law as soon as possible.
【学位授予单位】：天津师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.291.91
，

本文编号：1811254