当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 公司法论文 >

董事证券虚假陈述职务侵权责任制度的重构——以公司治理为视角

发布时间:2018-04-29 14:45

  本文选题:公司法 + 证券法 ; 参考:《法商研究》2010年04期


【摘要】:在董事证券虚假陈述职务侵权时,董事承担的是连带责任。学界关于董事承担连带责任的理论有越权行为无效理论、公司独立人格理论与公司代表理论、现代雇主责任理论与公共政策考量理论等。董事证券虚假陈述职务侵权责任的类型包括因连带侵权行为产生的连带责任、因连带保证及共同保证产生的连带责任和因不真正连带侵权产生的连带责任。我国现行董事证券虚假陈述侵权责任制度的安排一般都止于责任的认定,忽视或漠视责任的具体分配,因此,必须对其进行重构。从公司治理角度出发,这种重构可以从以下几个方面着手:(1)重新分配和排定董事、提名人股东及公司之间的赔偿责任及顺位;(2)明确规定各董事之间、各提名人股东之间的连带责任及各自应承担的赔偿份额;(3)创设公权处罚执行回补私权救济的制度;(4)注重与股东派生诉讼制度的协调。
[Abstract]:The director is jointly and severally liable when he infringing the position of misrepresentation of the director's securities. The theories of joint and several liability of directors in academic circles include the invalid theory of ultra vires act, the theory of independent personality of company and the theory of corporate representative, the theory of modern employer's liability and the theory of public policy consideration, and so on. The types of duty tort liability of directors' misrepresentation include joint liability, joint liability caused by joint and several tort, joint liability caused by joint guarantee and joint guarantee, and joint liability caused by non-genuine joint and several tort. The arrangement of the current system of tort liability for misrepresentation of directors' securities in our country generally ends in the confirmation of liability and neglects or ignores the specific distribution of liability. Therefore, it must be reconstructed. From the point of view of corporate governance, this reconfiguration can begin with the following aspects: 1) reassign and schedule directors, 2) liability between nominees, shareholders and companies, and 2) clear provisions between directors. The joint and several liability between the shareholders of the nominees and their respective share of compensation should be 3) the creation of the system of public right punishment to enforce the remedy of private rights (4)) the coordination of the system of derivative litigation with the shareholders.
【作者单位】: 中南民族大学法学院;
【基金】:国家社会科学基金资助项目(06BFX030)
【分类号】:D923

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前2条

1 崔振南,马明生;虚假陈述中董事对股东责任研究[J];中国法学;2003年02期

2 邵世星;侵权行为中的连带责任反思[J];国家检察官学院学报;2002年05期

【共引文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 孙少森;尹飞;;雇主责任构成要件之研究[J];中国青年政治学院学报;2006年01期

2 余慧娟;;雇主责任再思考[J];甘肃农业;2006年03期

3 高鹏;论共同危险行为之归责基础[J];安徽广播电视大学学报;2003年02期

4 高锐;浅析产品责任诉讼中的若干问题[J];安徽广播电视大学学报;2004年04期

5 刘仁文;刑法中的严格责任研究[J];比较法研究;2001年01期

6 尹志强;侵权行为概念分析[J];比较法研究;2005年04期

7 林q谛,

本文编号:1820382


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/1820382.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户9bba8***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com