论股东大会决议瑕疵的法律救济

发布时间：2018-04-29 19:29

本文选题：股东大会 + 决议　；参考：《东北财经大学》2005年硕士论文

【摘要】：股东大会决议瑕疵是指股东大会决议的程序或内容违反法律、行政法规、规章等规范性法律文件或公司章程的情形。我国现行公司法一方面关于股东大会决议瑕疵的诉前救济措施规定的不完善，许多先进的、重要的制度诸如表决权的书面行使、股东表决权排除制度、类别股东的分类表决制度、网络投票制度等没有加以规定；另一方面对股东大会决议瑕疵的诉讼救济措施规定的不充分，缺乏可操作性，，难以有效杜绝瑕疵决议的滋生。尽管新颁布的公司法对此问题加以重视，并在一定程度上对诉前救济措施和诉后救济措施加以完善，但依然存在空白和粗糙之处。立法的空白与粗糙势必造成实践中瑕疵决议的应运而生，因而有必要在借鉴国外先进的经验和制度基础上，对股东大会决议瑕疵的法律救济从诉前救济和诉后救济两个角度加以详尽的规定，从而达到保护中小股东的合法权益，实现股权平等的目的。本文主体分三大部分，第一部分是对股东大会决议瑕疵基本问题的概述，涉及决议瑕疵的概念，认定标准、表现形式和瑕疵决议的法律效力等问题。股东大会决议瑕疵主要是指决议程序和内容违反法律、法规、规章或公司章程的情形；在认定标准上比较宽松，不可过严；表现为程序瑕疵，包括召集程序或决议方法瑕疵和内容瑕疵，即内容违法法律、法规、规章或公司章程的情形；在瑕疵决议的效力上，究竟为无效，还是为可撤销，主张应根据瑕疵的具体情况加以具体的分析。第二部分是对我国现行股东大会决议瑕疵法律救济缺憾的分析。在诉前救济措施不完善中提出主要存在召集人单一化，召集通知规定的不合理、表决权行使方式落后又缺乏必要的限制、未规定股东大会出席数、未确立类别股东分立表决机制等缺陷；在诉讼救济措施不充分中分别对直接诉讼和派生诉讼的缺陷加以具体分析。第三部分是对股东大会决议瑕疵法律救济措施的完善，是本文的核心部分。笔者首先提出决议瑕疵的法律救济应遵循保持决议安定性、尊重决议程序性和利益均衡等原则；在召集程序上，需扩大召集权人、规范召集通知；在决议方法上，需采取多样化的表决方式并对表决权的行使加以限制，明确规定股东大会出席数，确立类别股东分类表决机制，推行
[Abstract]:The defect of resolution of shareholders' general meeting refers to the situation that the procedure or content of the resolution of shareholders' meeting violates the laws, administrative regulations, regulations and other normative legal documents or the articles of association of the company. On the one hand, on the one hand, the existing company law of our country is imperfect about the provisions of the pre-litigation relief measures on the defect of resolution of the shareholders' general meeting. Many advanced and important systems such as the written exercise of voting rights, the exclusion system of shareholders' voting rights, The classified voting system and network voting system are not provided for; on the other hand, the provisions of litigation relief measures for defects in the resolution of shareholders' general meeting are inadequate and lack of maneuverability, so it is difficult to effectively eliminate the breeding of defective resolutions. Although the newly promulgated Company Law attaches importance to this issue and to a certain extent consummates the relief measures before and after litigation, there are still gaps and rough points. The blank and rough legislation is bound to lead to the emergence of defective resolutions in practice, so it is necessary to learn from the advanced experience and system of foreign countries. In order to protect the legal rights and interests of minority shareholders and realize equity equality, the legal remedy for resolution defects of shareholders' general meeting is stipulated in detail from the two angles of pre-litigation relief and post-litigation relief. The main body of this paper is divided into three parts. The first part is an overview of the basic issues of resolution defects, including the concept of resolution defects, standards of identification, forms of expression and the legal effect of defective resolutions. A resolution flaw of a shareholders' general meeting mainly refers to a situation in which the procedures and contents of the resolution violate the laws, regulations, rules or articles of association; the standards for the determination of the resolution are relatively loose and must not be too strict; they are manifested as procedural defects, Including defects in the method of convening procedures or resolutions and defects in content, that is, illegal laws, regulations, regulations or articles of association of the company; whether the defective resolution is invalid or revocable in the effect of the resolution, Claims should be based on the specific situation of defects to specific analysis. The second part is the analysis of the defects of the current shareholders' general meeting resolution. In the imperfect pre-lawsuit relief measures, it is pointed out that the main problems are the simplification of the convener, the unreasonable provisions of the convening notice, the backward way of exercising voting rights and the lack of necessary restrictions, and the failure to stipulate the number of attendance at the general meeting of shareholders. The defects of direct action and derivative action are analyzed respectively in the inadequate litigation relief measures. The third part is the perfection of the legal relief measures for the resolution defects of the shareholders' general meeting, which is the core part of this paper. First of all, the author puts forward that the legal remedy for the resolution defects should follow the principles of maintaining the resolution stability, respecting the procedure of the resolution and balancing the interests of the resolution; in the convening procedure, it is necessary to expand the convening authority and standardize the convening notice; in the method of resolution, It is necessary to adopt a variety of voting methods and restrict the exercise of voting rights, specify the number of attendance at the general meeting of shareholders, establish a classified voting mechanism for class shareholders, and carry out
【学位授予单位】：东北财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2005
【分类号】：D912.29

【引证文献】