我国股东派生诉讼制度法律问题研究

发布时间：2018-05-03 18:51

本文选题：股东派生诉讼 + 股东直接诉讼　；参考：《云南财经大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：2006年我国颁布新《公司法》时,在借鉴英国、美国、日本等国关于股东派生诉讼规定的基础上,正式引入了股东派生诉讼制度,这无疑是完善公司的内部治理,更好维护和保障公司中小股东利益的一项新的创举。这一制度从颁布至今,一直是《公司法》理论界与实务界讨论的热点问题。由于股东派生诉讼制度对保护公司的合法权益,完善公司的内部治理方面发挥着重要的作用,所以它在股东诉讼制度体系中占有重要的不可替代的位置。本文将首先对股东派生诉讼制度的历史渊源及其发展轨迹进行梳理,旨在对派生诉讼的基本状况进行了解,从其产生、发展的过程中了解这一制度产生的历史必然性,了解这一制度的基本内涵,这样可以更好的理解这一制度的价值所在。其次,本文将对英美法系和大陆法系的股东派生诉讼制度进行研究,通过研究来了解和学习其他国家有关这一制度的先进立法与经验。最后,在将我国股东派生诉讼制度与其他国家的制度进行比较分析后,指出我国股东派生诉讼制度中存在很多不完善的地方,如:公司在派生诉讼中的法律地位在我国立法上存在空白、股东派生诉讼案件的诉讼管辖问题规定不明确、诉讼费用如何承担没有规定等等。针对这些问题本文都将在借鉴其他国家先进立法的基础上,再结合我国现实的法律体系特点与我国国情提出完善我们国家股东派生诉讼制度的个人意见。
[Abstract]:When China promulgated the new Company Law in 2006, on the basis of drawing lessons from the provisions of shareholder derivative litigation in Britain, the United States, Japan and other countries, the shareholder derivative litigation system was formally introduced, which is undoubtedly to perfect the internal governance of the company. Better safeguard and protect the interests of minority shareholders of the company a new initiative. Since its promulgation, this system has been a hot issue in the theoretical and practical circles of Company Law. Because the shareholder derivative litigation system plays an important role in protecting the legitimate rights and interests of the company and perfecting the internal governance of the company, it occupies an important and irreplaceable position in the shareholder litigation system. In this paper, the historical origin and development track of the derivative litigation system of shareholders are firstly analyzed, in order to understand the basic status of derivative litigation, and to understand the historical inevitability of the system in the process of its emergence and development. Understand the basic connotation of this system, so as to better understand the value of the system. Secondly, this paper will study the shareholder derivative litigation system of Anglo-American law system and civil law system, and learn from the advanced legislation and experience of other countries. Finally, after comparing and analyzing the system of shareholder derivative litigation in our country and other countries, the author points out that there are many imperfections in the system of shareholder derivative action in our country. For example: the legal status of the company in derivative litigation is blank in our country, the jurisdiction of shareholder derivative litigation is not clear, how to bear the costs of litigation is not stipulated, and so on. On the basis of drawing lessons from the advanced legislation of other countries and combining the characteristics of the legal system of our country and the national conditions of our country, this paper will put forward personal opinions to perfect the derivative litigation system of our country's shareholders.
【学位授予单位】：云南财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【参考文献】