我国《公司法》中信义义务的制度缺陷

发布时间：2018-05-15 05:04

本文选题：公司法 + 信义义务　；参考：《天津师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2015年01期

【摘要】：信义义务制度在公司利益相关者之间冲突关系的平衡中居于核心地位,其制度内涵伴随着解决公司代理问题的实际需求不断演化:义务范围从忠实义务发展到忠实义务和注意义务并重;履行义务的判断标准因经营判断规则的确立而更加符合实际需求;义务主体由董事逐渐延伸至控制股东,相应的权利方也在向小股东和公司债权人方面扩展。相比之下,我国《公司法》的相关规定存在以下缺陷:忠实义务与注意义务的规定明显失衡;忽视控股股东对小股东的信义义务;忽视董事对公司债权人的信义义务;忽视商业判断规则的引入和运用。这在一定程度上削弱了司法救济在公司治理中的作用,影响了公司治理水平的提升。
[Abstract]:The fiduciary obligation system plays a central role in the balance of the conflict relationship between the stakeholders of the company. The connotation of its system is evolving with the actual demand of solving the agency problem of company: the scope of the obligation of loyalty develops from the duty of loyalty to the duty of loyalty and duty of care; The judgment standard of performing obligation is more in line with the actual demand because of the establishment of the operating judgment rule; the subject of obligation extends gradually from director to controlling shareholder, and the corresponding right party also extends to minority shareholder and company creditor. In contrast, the relevant provisions of the Company Law of our country have the following defects: the obligations of loyalty and care are obviously out of balance, the fiduciary obligations of controlling shareholders towards minority shareholders, the fiduciary obligations of directors to creditors of the company are ignored; Ignore the introduction and application of commercial judgment rules. To some extent, it weakens the function of judicial remedy in corporate governance and affects the improvement of corporate governance level.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学民商经济法学院;
【基金】：中国政法大学横向科研项目(2013年)
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【相似文献】