一人有限责任公司为股东担保问题研究

发布时间：2018-05-25 09:06

本文选题：担保 + 限制性允许　；参考：《西南政法大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：我国虽然于2005年修订《中华人民共和国公司法》时引入了一人有限责任公司、公司担保等制度,但并未对一人有限责任公司为股东担保问题作出具有针对性的规定。就此而言,公司法学界的相关研究也稍显薄弱,甚至存在较多的研究空白。不过,基于案件处理需要,实务界对此问题则有所涉及。然而,由于我国现行公司法相关规范的欠缺,以至实务界对该问题产生了较大分歧。鉴于此,本文采用比较研究、实证分析、历史分析与价值分析等多种研究方法,力求对一人有限责任公司为股东担保问题作较为深入探讨。除引言外,全文共分为6个部分。第一部分——问题的引入:卜邦干诉柯尼马公司保证合同纠纷案。有关一人有限责任公司为股东担保问题的舆论,主要源自2010年1月28日《人民法院报》刊载的《常州中院判决卜邦干诉柯尼马公司保证合同纠纷案》一文。该案的焦点之一,即是一人有限责任公司为股东担保问题。一人有限责任公司为股东担保的实质,即在于公司债权人非自愿地成为公司为股东担保所引发风险的最终和主要承担者。第二部分,我国一人有限责任公司为股东担保之立法现状。本部分首先采取比较研究与实证分析的方法,研究了我国有关一人有限责任公司为股东担保的立法源流,并对舆论界所存在的三种观点:允许说、禁止说、“立法漏洞”说,作了重点评析,进而提出并确证了“未规定说”。第三部分,我国一人有限责任公司为股东担保立法引入与模式选择。目前,我国已具备了对一人有限责任公司为股东担保问题加以规制的立法条件。在立法引入前,有必要对其他法域相关立法模式作合理评析与经验借鉴,这样将有利于确立我国一人有限责任公司为股东担保所应引入的立法模式。第四部分,我国一人有限责任公司为股东担保制度之理论依据。在“限制性允许”立法模式之下,我国一人有限责任公司为股东担保制度之建构应当寻找其合理的理论依据,以寻求正当性。为此,本文分别从制度成因、价值考量、主体因素、利益平衡等四个方面作了适当探讨。第五部分,我国一人有限责任公司为股东担保制度之发展突破。本部分紧密围绕我国一人有限责任公司为股东担保制度的理论依据,从适用范围、决定权配置、强制性信息披露、债权人直接保护等多方面对现有制度作了尝试性研究,进而形成了我国一人有限责任公司为股东担保规制的主要制度。第六部分,总结。本部分在总结前五部分研究的基础上,认为我国一人有限责任公司为股东担保制度的建设应采取“分步走”的策略,并具体提出了本文认为可供当前“第一步”立法所借鉴的立法建议。
[Abstract]:Although our country introduced the system of one-man limited liability company and company guarantee when we revised the "Company Law of the people's Republic of China" in 2005, it has not made a specific provision on the guarantee of one-person limited liability company for shareholders. In this regard, the relevant research in the field of corporate law is also slightly weak, and there are even more research gaps. However, due to the need to deal with the case, the practical community is involved in this issue. However, due to the lack of relevant norms of current company law in China, there are great differences in practice. In view of this, this paper uses comparative research, empirical analysis, historical analysis and value analysis and other research methods, trying to make a more in-depth study of one-person limited liability company for shareholders guarantee. In addition to the introduction, the full text is divided into six parts. The first part-the introduction of the question: Bubbang Gan v. Conima Company Suretyship contract dispute case. The public opinion about the guarantee of one-person limited liability company for shareholders is mainly derived from the article "dispute over guarantee contract of Changzhou Intermediate people's Court" published on January 28, 2010 in the people's Court of Changzhou. One of the focuses of the case was the one-person limited liability company's guarantee for shareholders. The essence of one-person limited liability company's guarantee for shareholders is that the creditors of the company become the ultimate and main bearer of the risk caused by the company's guarantee for the shareholders involuntarily. The second part, our country one-person limited liability company guarantees for the shareholder legislation present situation. This part first adopts the method of comparative study and empirical analysis to study the legislative source of one-person limited liability company as shareholder guarantee in China, and three viewpoints of public opinion: permission, prohibition, "legislative loophole". Then, the author puts forward and confirms the unspecified theory. The third part, the one-person limited liability company for shareholders guarantee legislation introduction and mode selection. At present, our country already has the legislative condition to regulate the one-person limited liability company for the shareholder guarantee problem. Before the introduction of legislation, it is necessary to make a reasonable assessment and reference to the relevant legislative models in other jurisdictions, which will help to establish the legislative model that should be introduced into the one-person limited liability company as the shareholder guarantee in our country. The fourth part, our country one-person limited liability company is the shareholder guarantee system theory basis. Under the legislative mode of "restrictive permission", the construction of one-person limited liability company as shareholder guarantee system should find its reasonable theoretical basis in order to seek legitimacy. Therefore, this paper makes a proper discussion from four aspects: institutional cause, value consideration, subject factor and interest balance. The fifth part, our country one-person limited liability company for the shareholder guarantee system development breakthrough. This part focuses on the theoretical basis of one-person limited liability company for shareholders guarantee system, from the scope of application, decision allocation, mandatory information disclosure, direct protection of creditors and other aspects of the existing system of trial research. And then formed our country one-person limited liability company for shareholders guarantee regulation of the main system. The sixth part, summary. On the basis of summing up the first five parts of the research, this part thinks that the one-man limited liability company should adopt the strategy of "step by step" in the construction of the guarantee system for the shareholders. The paper also puts forward some legislative suggestions which can be used for reference in the first step legislation.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【参考文献】