中国在美上市企业集团诉讼法律风险防范与对策研究
[Abstract]:Since Zhonghua net encountered class action in the United States, Chinese listed companies in the United States have been involved in class litigation. Class litigation may not only make the listed companies in the United States bear huge litigation costs and related costs, but also the share prices of the sued companies may fluctuate with the development of the litigation situation. What is more serious is that the litigation may reduce the image of the company in the eyes of consumers and its brand influence will be damaged in the long run, which will not be conducive to the future refinancing and market development of the company. However, most of the reasons for the class action are caused by the fact that Chinese listed companies in the United States do not know or are not used to complying with the laws and regulations of the local capital market. In order to reduce the occurrence of such cases, It is urgent to study the legal risks and preventive countermeasures of class action for Chinese listed enterprises in the United States. This paper is based on the consideration of a series of class litigation cases of Chinese listed enterprises in the United States. In order to reveal the necessity of studying the legal risks and preventive countermeasures of group litigation, this paper explores the risks and losses of Chinese listed enterprises going to the United States by way of cases, and puts forward some suggestions through reviewing itself and drawing lessons from international experience. The first part first introduces the concept of American class action, the evolution process and main content of American securities legal system, and finally summarizes the significance of American securities legal system. The second part mainly focuses on the legal risk of Chinese listed enterprises in American securities group litigation. This paper first introduces the current situation and main reasons of Chinese enterprises going to the United States to list in the United States, and then leads to the third part of the adverse consequences of Chinese listed enterprises in the United States after they encounter securities group litigation. This paper analyzes the main reasons why Chinese listed enterprises encounter class action in the United States, mainly due to the lack of understanding and attention to American laws, culture, laws and regulations, and the non-standard disclosure of information. And the fourth part of the three reasons for not establishing a complete corporate governance mechanism. On the basis of the above analysis, this paper expounds the prevention and countermeasures of China's listed enterprises in the United States to deal with the legal risks of securities group litigation. It mainly includes: (1) fully understanding and mastering the laws, regulations and regulatory requirements of American capital market; (2) taking effective measures to ensure the timely and accurate disclosure of information; (3) perfecting the internal control and governance mechanism of the company; (4) to establish and perfect the legal system of the company and actively deal with the securities group litigation.
【学位授予单位】:西南政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D922.295;D971.2
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 何锦龙;;论证券欺诈的防治[J];安徽文学(下半月);2008年07期
2 杨东;;论金融衍生品消费者保护的统合法规制——高盛“欺诈门”事件的启示[J];比较法研究;2011年05期
3 马俊芳;;两种反收购决定权模式之分析与比较[J];长春工业大学学报(社会科学版);2011年02期
4 孟扬;;从武钢权证创设争议透视——我国备兑认股权证监管法律制度的完善[J];晟典律师评论;2007年01期
5 廖静怡;罗浩;;论我国证券场外交易市场法律制度的建构[J];西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2010年04期
6 许前川;;论证券行政责任[J];成都行政学院学报(哲学社会科学);2006年05期
7 谢琼;;论保荐行为风险的规制[J];重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版);2009年12期
8 李治国;刘新;;国际视野下上市公司关联交易的监管体系[J];重庆社会科学;2011年11期
9 刘仁山;李婷;;美国“F立方”证券欺诈诉讼管辖权规则及其晚近发展[J];法学家;2012年03期
10 梁爽;;日本证券虚假陈述责任法律适用对我国的启示[J];法学;2011年01期
相关会议论文 前2条
1 蒋贤志;;我国公司换股并购制度研究[A];使命与发展——第四届西部律师发展论坛论文集[C];2011年
2 蓝寿荣;;论私募发行的注册豁免与欺诈监管——从2013年美国证券交易委员会对芝加哥会议中心项目提起证券欺诈诉讼说起[A];金融法学家(第五辑)[C];2013年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 颜晓闽;美国证券法律史研究[D];华东政法大学;2010年
2 赵静;资产支持证券的监管制度研究[D];华东政法大学;2010年
3 李治国;上市公司关联交易形成机制与治理研究[D];山东大学;2011年
4 蔡迪;美国联邦私募基金法律制度史研究[D];华东政法大学;2011年
5 邱润根;外国公司跨境上市法律制度研究[D];华东政法大学;2011年
6 吴晓锋;公司并购中少数股东利益保护法律制度研究[D];西南政法大学;2005年
7 杨少南;证券侵权法律制度研究[D];西南政法大学;2005年
8 蓝寿荣;上市公司股东知情权研究[D];华中科技大学;2005年
9 王宝江;资产证券化意见书与律师责任[D];中国政法大学;2007年
10 高建宁;我国证券发行监管制度及其有效性分析[D];南京农业大学;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 王伟;投资人适当性法律制度探讨[D];华东政法大学;2010年
2 陈献茗;论我国证券信用交易监管法律制度构建[D];华东政法大学;2010年
3 孟捷;我国现行限售股流通制度及其探析[D];华东政法大学;2010年
4 高科;投票代理权征集法律制度的比较研究[D];中国海洋大学;2010年
5 赵明珠;美国私募发行法律制度研究[D];华东政法大学;2010年
6 温培韬;证券市场虚假陈述的民事责任[D];烟台大学;2010年
7 武铁凝;股东代表诉讼制度研究[D];东北财经大学;2010年
8 丁星元;中国私募法律制度研究[D];吉林大学;2011年
9 郑永超;美国新政时期证券监管制度研究(1929-1945)[D];吉林大学;2011年
10 张晗;证券公开发行预披露制度研究[D];吉林大学;2011年
本文编号:2131124
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/2131124.html