公司法中的公司自治与国家强制
发布时间：2018-08-17 17:52
【摘要】：公司的自治和强制是公司制度中一直备受关注的问题,也是各国公司法所致力想要协调的一对关系。公司自治是私法自治的具体表现,也是现在经济社会发展所需要的。但是由于市场失灵、公司社会责任的缺失等问题使得国家强制的介入成为必须。而公司自治与强制也是一个矛盾体,二者相互依存,但是却也需要一个度。所以就需要在自治与强制之间划一个界限,具体在公司法中就是要在任意性规范和强制性规范间找到平衡点。本文运用了历史研究、比较研究、实证研究的方法,从对公司法中自治和强制的分析出发,对二者的关系进行探讨,最后结合新《公司法》中自治与强制的具体表现进行了相关的思考。 本文的正文一共分为五个部分进行分析和论述。 第一部分主要对公司的自治问题进行了解释研究。首先对公司自治的定义进行了界定,从传统和现代、我国和西方比较论述。在清楚公司自治定义的基础上又指出其性质其实就是私法自治,是私法自治在公司领域的体现。最后又对公司自治的内容进行了阐述。 第二部分是对公司法中国家强制的具体论述。先指出公司法国家强制的定义,后将重点放在了国家强制的必要性问题上。国家强制的原因理论是市场失灵理论,其体现的价值是效率以及公平、正义。而国家强制在公司法中的表现形式则是强制性规范。 第三部分是在前两部分的基础上对公司法中的自治和强制问题进行了界限的划分。首先指出了公司法是在私法基础上的公法化性质,又强调了公司自治和强制需要遵循适度原则,然后结合公司法中法律规范的结构对自治和强制的界限进行了分析和研究,最后运用历史的、比较的方式,通过研究其它国家的公司法中自治与强制二者关系的发展史来加深对该问题的理解。 第四部分是公司自治与国家强制关系的实证研究。具体对我国新《公司法》中体现的相关公司自治和国家强制的法条进行了归纳分析。 最后一部分是在前面理论分析以及实证研究的基础上进行的思考,从而对我国新《公司法》中关于公司自治和强制问题的理解适用时遇到的问题提出的相应对策。
[Abstract]:Corporate autonomy and coercion are always concerned in the corporate system, and also a pair of relations that the corporation law of various countries strives to coordinate. Corporate autonomy is the concrete manifestation of private law autonomy, and is also needed by the economic and social development. However, due to the market failure, the lack of corporate social responsibility and other issues, the state compulsory intervention. Therefore, it is necessary to draw a line between autonomy and compulsion, specifically in corporate justice, to find a balance between arbitrary norms and mandatory norms. The research method, starting from the analysis of the autonomy and compulsion in the company law, discusses the relationship between the two, and finally gives some thoughts on the concrete manifestations of autonomy and compulsion in the new company law.
The text of this article is divided into five parts for analysis and discussion.
Firstly, the definition of corporation autonomy is defined and compared with that of Western countries. On the basis of clear definition of Corporation autonomy, it is pointed out that the nature of corporation autonomy is actually the autonomy of private law, which is the embodiment of the autonomy of private law in the field of corporation. The contents of autonomy are expounded.
The second part is a concrete exposition of the state compulsion in the company law. First, it points out the definition of the state compulsion in the company law, and then focuses on the necessity of the state compulsion. It's a mandatory norm.
The third part divides the autonomy and coercion of corporation law on the basis of the first two parts. Firstly, it points out that corporation law is a kind of public law on the basis of private law, and emphasizes that corporation autonomy and coercion should follow the principle of moderation. Then it divides autonomy and coercion according to the structure of legal norms in Corporation law. Limits are analyzed and studied. Finally, the historical and comparative methods are used to deepen the understanding of this issue by studying the history of the relationship between autonomy and compulsion in other countries.
The fourth part is an empirical study of the relationship between corporate autonomy and state compulsion.
The last part is based on the above theoretical analysis and empirical research, so as to put forward the corresponding countermeasures for the problems in the understanding and application of corporate autonomy and coercion in the new Company Law.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.91
本文编号：2188421
[Abstract]:Corporate autonomy and coercion are always concerned in the corporate system, and also a pair of relations that the corporation law of various countries strives to coordinate. Corporate autonomy is the concrete manifestation of private law autonomy, and is also needed by the economic and social development. However, due to the market failure, the lack of corporate social responsibility and other issues, the state compulsory intervention. Therefore, it is necessary to draw a line between autonomy and compulsion, specifically in corporate justice, to find a balance between arbitrary norms and mandatory norms. The research method, starting from the analysis of the autonomy and compulsion in the company law, discusses the relationship between the two, and finally gives some thoughts on the concrete manifestations of autonomy and compulsion in the new company law.
The text of this article is divided into five parts for analysis and discussion.
Firstly, the definition of corporation autonomy is defined and compared with that of Western countries. On the basis of clear definition of Corporation autonomy, it is pointed out that the nature of corporation autonomy is actually the autonomy of private law, which is the embodiment of the autonomy of private law in the field of corporation. The contents of autonomy are expounded.
The second part is a concrete exposition of the state compulsion in the company law. First, it points out the definition of the state compulsion in the company law, and then focuses on the necessity of the state compulsion. It's a mandatory norm.
The third part divides the autonomy and coercion of corporation law on the basis of the first two parts. Firstly, it points out that corporation law is a kind of public law on the basis of private law, and emphasizes that corporation autonomy and coercion should follow the principle of moderation. Then it divides autonomy and coercion according to the structure of legal norms in Corporation law. Limits are analyzed and studied. Finally, the historical and comparative methods are used to deepen the understanding of this issue by studying the history of the relationship between autonomy and compulsion in other countries.
The fourth part is an empirical study of the relationship between corporate autonomy and state compulsion.
The last part is based on the above theoretical analysis and empirical research, so as to put forward the corresponding countermeasures for the problems in the understanding and application of corporate autonomy and coercion in the new Company Law.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.91
【引证文献】
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 吴伟洁;我国有限责任公司自治改革研究[D];华东师范大学;2012年
2 洪森;包容性增长语境下的高管薪酬司法审查机制探析[D];暨南大学;2013年
，本文编号：2188421
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/2188421.html
