中小股东权益保护的法理分析与制度设计探讨
[Abstract]:The company is the product of socialized mass production. Since the birth of this organization form, it has provided important system guarantee for the economic development of countries all over the world. Controlling shareholders have an inherent strong position, so the interests of minority shareholders are always exposed to the power of controlling shareholders. At any time, they are vulnerable to decisions made by controlling shareholders on their own economic interests and other improper transactions. In order to maximize their own interests, controlling shareholders often ignore the interests of the company and the interests of the majority of minority shareholders, so that the majority of minority shareholders suffer a lot of harm, which affects the healthy development of joint stock limited companies. Therefore, how to protect the rights and interests of minority shareholders of limited stock companies has become a widespread concern of scholars all over the world. The protection of minority shareholders' rights and interests plays an important role in promoting the investment confidence of minority shareholders, and it is also directly related to the stability and sustainable development of our capital market, so it is of practical significance to study the protection of minority shareholders' rights and interests. There are many opinions on the protection of the rights and interests of minority shareholders, but generally it is limited to the perfection and proposal of specific system protection measures, and it does not analyze the deeper reasons which should be protected, resulting in loopholes or partial generalizations in the process of discussion. Therefore, it is of theoretical value to discuss the protection of minority shareholders' rights and interests from the perspective of jurisprudence. This paper studies the rights and interests of minority shareholders in China from the point of view of jurisprudence, and puts forward a series of legislative suggestions on the protection of the rights and interests of minority shareholders in our country by investigating the relevant theories and practical experiences of foreign countries and combining with the actual national conditions. The article is divided into three major parts: chapter one analyzes the current situation of the infringement of minority shareholders' rights and interests in China. By investigating the current situation of the infringement of minority shareholders' rights and interests in China, this chapter concludes that the infringement of minority shareholders' rights and interests mainly comes from the majority shareholders and the management of the company. The main reasons for the present situation are the imperfect system of the company's organs, the lack of corresponding internal restriction mechanisms, and the lack of clear legal provisions on the obligations and responsibilities of the major shareholders and the management of the company. The abuse of capital majority decision and the infringement of minority shareholders. In addition, the litigation mechanism of minority shareholders is not smooth, especially the shareholder derivative litigation mechanism has not been established, so that the rights of minority shareholders are infringed, there is no effective judicial remedy. The second chapter analyzes the legal protection system of foreign minority shareholders. Based on the investigation of the historical evolution of the protection of minority shareholders' rights in the two major legal systems, this paper makes a certain evaluation and concludes the development trend of the protection of minority shareholders' rights. The third chapter sums up the concrete contents of minority shareholders' rights and the necessity of protecting them, and tries to find the basis of protection theoretically. The fourth chapter is the legislative perfection of the protection of minority shareholders' rights and interests in China. This paper expounds from two aspects of perfecting the system of the company's organ and establishing the system of shareholder derivative litigation, specifically from the aspects of the system of shareholders' general meeting, the system of board of directors, the system of board of supervisors, and the reference to foreign experience. The concrete improvement measures in our country are put forward in order to set up good internal operation mechanism of the company and achieve the purpose of preventing infringement. In view of the problem of imperfect litigation mechanism of minority shareholders in our country, this paper puts forward the establishment of derivative litigation system of minority shareholders in our country by using foreign experience for reference, specifically from the subject of litigation, the legal status of litigant parties, and the prerequisite of litigation. This paper expounds the rights and responsibilities of the litigant shareholders and expects to widen the legal ways for the minority shareholders to resort to judicial remedies under the condition that the infringement on the minority shareholders has become a reality.
【学位授予单位】:华东理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D922.291.91
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张晓雯;;试论我国上市公司中中小股东利益的保护[J];中小企业管理与科技(上旬刊);2011年07期
2 尚玲玉;;浅谈上市公司收购中对中小股东权益的保护[J];知识经济;2011年14期
3 关苏晴;许崇峰;;中小股东权利保护[J];法制与社会;2011年18期
4 吕永铮;;论大股东对中小股东权益侵害及保护措施[J];企业导报;2011年10期
5 许崇峰;关苏晴;;略议新《公司法》对中小股东权益的保护[J];中共郑州市委党校学报;2011年03期
6 赵伟;;浅谈中小股东的权利保护问题[J];现代经济信息;2011年12期
7 王冰;;论我国中小股东权利的法律保护[J];改革与开放;2011年12期
8 郑继红;;打破企业中小股东权益保护的瓶颈[J];法人;2011年07期
9 彭真明;陆剑;;司法介入上市公司内部治理:本土化困境及其出路[J];社会科学战线;2011年05期
10 徐晓路;;浅议累积投票制对中小股东利益的保护[J];商场现代化;2011年15期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 许巧蓉;蔡浩;;论中小股东权益的保护[A];投资者保护与公司治理论坛论文集[C];2010年
2 张庆;;公司治理中小股东权益的保护[A];投资者保护与公司治理论坛论文集[C];2010年
3 仇小松;;论股份公司中小股东权益的民事诉讼救济[A];第二届贵州法学论坛文集[C];2001年
4 吴旭;;我国上市公司中小股东的保护[A];中国民商法实务论坛论文集[C];2002年
5 丁丁;潘方方;;论股东派生争议的可仲裁性[A];中国仲裁与司法论坛暨2010年年会论文集[C];2010年
6 陶景洲;;试论中小股东的权益保护[A];中国律师2000年大会论文精选(上卷)[C];2000年
7 曹建宇;;中小股东权益保护立法现状及制度完善[A];中部崛起与现代服务业——第二届中部商业经济论坛论文集[C];2008年
8 姜福丛;;中小股东参与权的保护与制度完善[A];中华全国律师协会经济专业委员会2002年年会论文集[C];2002年
9 张林云;马广奇;;中小股东权益保护:理论溯源与制度借鉴[A];2007环渤海区域金融合作发展研讨会论文集[C];2007年
10 项先权;;上市公司中小股东权益保护[A];中华全国律师协会公司法专业委员会2009年年会论文集[C];2009年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 侯捷宁;保护中小股东权益就是保护中国股市[N];证券日报;2008年
2 侯捷宁;保中小股东权益就是保A股[N];中国改革报;2008年
3 本报记者 刘兴祥;中小股东权益更有保障[N];证券时报;2002年
4 陈家洪(作者系江西财经大学金融学院副教授);尽快制订中小股东权益保护法[N];证券时报;2004年
5 张敏邋王刚;保护小股东的权益[N];江苏法制报;2007年
6 本报记者尹永强;中小股东权益落到实处[N];证券时报;2003年
7 惠莉;应立法保护中小股东权益[N];江苏法制报;2005年
8 雷正云;对中小股东权益的保护[N];人民法院报;2005年
9 秦皇岛市经济管理干部学校 何小双;小股东权益保护制度刍论[N];法制日报;2001年
10 本报记者 马立群;突出保护中小股东权益[N];经济日报;2005年
相关博士学位论文 前9条
1 邓贺赢;小股东权益受损分析[D];辽宁大学;2004年
2 袁涌波;中国民营上市公司治理结构研究[D];复旦大学;2005年
3 芦峰;公司治理与中小股东权益保护研究[D];暨南大学;2009年
4 杨松;股东之间利益冲突研究[D];北京大学;2004年
5 雷晓冰;表决权信托制度研究[D];华东政法大学;2007年
6 温湛滨;股东权益保护的融资效应[D];暨南大学;2007年
7 刘彤;中国上市公司所有权结构效率研究[D];厦门大学;2003年
8 封文丽;中国上市公司治理体系构建研究[D];东北农业大学;2004年
9 赵海林;上市公司利益转移行为研究[D];河海大学;2005年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 朱晶晶;论中小股东权益保护边界之合理界定[D];华东政法大学;2010年
2 卢建光;上市公司中小股东权益保护法律问题研究[D];山东大学;2010年
3 王佑灵;中小股东权益保护的法理分析与制度设计探讨[D];华东理工大学;2011年
4 陈潇潇;资产并购中的中小股东权益保护[D];湖南大学;2010年
5 吴静静;试论我国表决权信托制度的引入[D];厦门大学;2008年
6 金利;论股份回购中中小股东权益的保护[D];对外经济贸易大学;2006年
7 凤为武;中小股东权益保护问题研究[D];安徽大学;2004年
8 张素兰;股份公司中小股东权益的保护研究[D];山东大学;2005年
9 吴瑞骥;中小股东权益保护研究[D];西南政法大学;2011年
10 李世文;公司治理的法律问题研究[D];华侨大学;2005年
,本文编号:2188968
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/2188968.html