法人董事制度与公司治理——对“肯定说”的商榷与修法建议
发布时间：2018-08-29 17:58
【摘要】：法人能否担任董事?我国1993年《公司法》及2005年的修订中对此都缺乏明确规定,1997年中国证监会颁布的《上市公司章程指引》虽规定了只能由自然人担任上市公司董事,但其效力层级低,也不能规范到有限责任公司。这些立法缺漏已致实践中滋生出许多纠纷而无从解决,法理上也陷入困惑和争议。新近台湾"力霸案"的教训更促使我们有必要对法人担任董事的问题作一全面探讨和明确回答。肯定法人董事制度的学说在理论与实践上并不可行,应运用"奥康剃刀"原则,在我国公司法中明确规定董事仅为自然人,而不宜推行法人董事制度,以提升公司治理之良效。
[Abstract]:Can a legal person serve as a director? In our country's 1993 Company Law and the 2005 revision, there is no clear stipulation on this. Although the "articles of Association of listed companies" issued by China Securities Regulatory Commission in 1997 stipulates that only natural persons can serve as directors of listed companies, the level of effectiveness is low. Nor can it be regulated to a limited liability company. These legislative gaps have led to a lot of disputes in practice that can not be resolved, legal theory is also in confusion and controversy. The lesson of Taiwan's "Rebar case" has made it necessary for us to give a comprehensive discussion and a clear answer to the question of legal person as a director. The theory of affirming the legal person director system is not feasible in theory and practice. The principle of "Oakon Razor" should be used to clearly stipulate that the director is only a natural person in our company law, and it is not appropriate to carry out the legal person director system in order to improve the good effect of corporate governance.
【作者单位】：
【分类号】：D922.291.91
[Abstract]:Can a legal person serve as a director? In our country's 1993 Company Law and the 2005 revision, there is no clear stipulation on this. Although the "articles of Association of listed companies" issued by China Securities Regulatory Commission in 1997 stipulates that only natural persons can serve as directors of listed companies, the level of effectiveness is low. Nor can it be regulated to a limited liability company. These legislative gaps have led to a lot of disputes in practice that can not be resolved, legal theory is also in confusion and controversy. The lesson of Taiwan's "Rebar case" has made it necessary for us to give a comprehensive discussion and a clear answer to the question of legal person as a director. The theory of affirming the legal person director system is not feasible in theory and practice. The principle of "Oakon Razor" should be used to clearly stipulate that the director is only a natural person in our company law, and it is not appropriate to carry out the legal person director system in order to improve the good effect of corporate governance.
【作者单位】：
【分类号】：D922.291.91
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 张卫英;法人是否可以担任公司董事[J];北京科技大学学报(社会科学版);2005年04期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 胡智强,陆明;论证券信息披露的及时性原则[J];安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2004年04期
2 范宜龙;;略论我国公司股东出资方式[J];安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版);2006年03期
3 王红;公司章程变更法律探析——从动因和规制层面[J];北京化工大学学报(社会科学版);2004年01期
4 肖峰;叶敏;;论保险资产管理公司法律规制[J];北京化工大学学报(社会科学版);2005年04期
5 杨继;公司董事“注意义务”与“忠实义务”辨[J];比较法研究;2003年03期
6 赵晓华,潘凤焕;控制股东忠实义务探析[J];北京市经济管理干部学院学报;2003年03期
7 林q谛，
本文编号：2211972
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/2211972.html
