公司僵局法律救济制度研究
发布时间：2018-09-06 18:31
【摘要】：我国2006年1月1日起实施的新《公司法》第183条规定了“司法解散公司”的制度,打破了我国对公司僵局司法救济的立法空白,标志着我国司法调整开始正式介入公司僵局问题的解决,这在立法上是一个重大的突破。然而,总体来看,由于我国立法关于公司僵局的理论明显准备不足,现行公司法对公司僵局的规制仍缺乏体系性的构建,遗漏较多,可操作性差。因此,寻找公司僵局的司法救济途径就成为公司法理论研究和实务探索的重要议题。 公司僵局产生于相对的两派力量对抗之中,主要表现在公司决策机制明显滞后,导致的后果是公司经营陷入瘫痪,进而使公司及股东的利益受到损害。西方诸国应对公司僵局问题已有近百年历史,其经验可为我国构建公司僵局制度提供经验和借鉴。本文围绕公司僵局法律问题,较为深入地分析了公司僵局的概念、特征、形成原因以及危害性,通过比较法学的分析方法,比较研习了国外先进国家解决公司僵局的立法和司法经验,对我国公司解散制度进行法理分析,在此基础探讨我国公司僵局的法律应对。 全文分为三个部分: 第一部分论述公司僵局的基本问题。这一部分对公司僵局的理论背景、涵义及分类进行了总结性概括。本部分不仅对公司僵局危害性进行了较为细致的评析,而且就公司僵局司法救济的法理基础、必要性和法律意义进行了评述。第二部分是比较分析域外公司僵局法律救济制度的立法现状及其先进经验,这里主要分析了英美法系中英国和美国以及大陆法系中的德国和日本在公司僵局问题上立法特点,通过中西不同的立法比较,进行了比较法研究。第三部分针对我国公司僵局法律救济制度的现状深入分析了我国公司僵局法律救济制度的缺陷与不足,同时提出了对完善我国公司僵局法律救济体系的构想。
[Abstract]:Article 183 of the New Company Law, which came into effect on January 1, 2006, stipulates the system of "judicial dissolution of company", which breaks the legislative blank of judicial relief to the deadlock of companies in our country. It marks the beginning of judicial adjustment in our country to resolve the problem of corporate deadlock, which is a major breakthrough in legislation. However, on the whole, due to the lack of preparation for the theory of corporate deadlock in our country's legislation, the regulation of corporate deadlock in the current company law is still lack of systematic construction, more omissions and poor maneuverability. Therefore, looking for the judicial remedy of corporate deadlock has become an important topic in the theoretical research and practical exploration of company law. The corporate deadlock arises from the relative confrontation between the two forces, which is mainly reflected in the obvious lag of the decision-making mechanism of the company, which results in the paralysis of the company's management and the damage to the interests of the company and its shareholders. The western countries have been dealing with the corporate deadlock for nearly a hundred years, and their experience can provide experience and reference for the construction of the corporate deadlock system in China. Focusing on the legal problems of corporate deadlock, this paper deeply analyzes the concept, characteristics, causes and harmfulness of corporate deadlock. This paper compares and studies the legislative and judicial experiences of foreign advanced countries in resolving the corporate deadlock, analyzes the legal principles of the dissolution system of Chinese companies, and probes into the legal countermeasures of the corporate deadlock in our country on this basis. The paper is divided into three parts: the first part discusses the basic problems of corporate deadlock. This part summarizes the theoretical background, meaning and classification of corporate deadlock. This part not only makes a detailed analysis on the harmfulness of corporate deadlock, but also comments on the legal basis, necessity and legal significance of the judicial remedy of corporate deadlock. The second part is a comparative analysis of the legislative status and advanced experience of the extraterritorial legal relief system of corporate deadlock. This part mainly analyzes the legislative characteristics of the Anglo-American legal system in the United Kingdom and the United States and Germany and Japan in the continental law system in the corporate deadlock. Through the comparison of different legislations between China and the West, the comparative law is studied. In the third part, according to the current situation of the legal remedy system of the corporate deadlock in our country, the defects and deficiencies of the legal relief system of the corporate deadlock in our country are deeply analyzed, and the conception of perfecting the legal relief system of the corporate deadlock in our country is put forward at the same time.
【学位授予单位】：宁波大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.91
本文编号：2227172
[Abstract]:Article 183 of the New Company Law, which came into effect on January 1, 2006, stipulates the system of "judicial dissolution of company", which breaks the legislative blank of judicial relief to the deadlock of companies in our country. It marks the beginning of judicial adjustment in our country to resolve the problem of corporate deadlock, which is a major breakthrough in legislation. However, on the whole, due to the lack of preparation for the theory of corporate deadlock in our country's legislation, the regulation of corporate deadlock in the current company law is still lack of systematic construction, more omissions and poor maneuverability. Therefore, looking for the judicial remedy of corporate deadlock has become an important topic in the theoretical research and practical exploration of company law. The corporate deadlock arises from the relative confrontation between the two forces, which is mainly reflected in the obvious lag of the decision-making mechanism of the company, which results in the paralysis of the company's management and the damage to the interests of the company and its shareholders. The western countries have been dealing with the corporate deadlock for nearly a hundred years, and their experience can provide experience and reference for the construction of the corporate deadlock system in China. Focusing on the legal problems of corporate deadlock, this paper deeply analyzes the concept, characteristics, causes and harmfulness of corporate deadlock. This paper compares and studies the legislative and judicial experiences of foreign advanced countries in resolving the corporate deadlock, analyzes the legal principles of the dissolution system of Chinese companies, and probes into the legal countermeasures of the corporate deadlock in our country on this basis. The paper is divided into three parts: the first part discusses the basic problems of corporate deadlock. This part summarizes the theoretical background, meaning and classification of corporate deadlock. This part not only makes a detailed analysis on the harmfulness of corporate deadlock, but also comments on the legal basis, necessity and legal significance of the judicial remedy of corporate deadlock. The second part is a comparative analysis of the legislative status and advanced experience of the extraterritorial legal relief system of corporate deadlock. This part mainly analyzes the legislative characteristics of the Anglo-American legal system in the United Kingdom and the United States and Germany and Japan in the continental law system in the corporate deadlock. Through the comparison of different legislations between China and the West, the comparative law is studied. In the third part, according to the current situation of the legal remedy system of the corporate deadlock in our country, the defects and deficiencies of the legal relief system of the corporate deadlock in our country are deeply analyzed, and the conception of perfecting the legal relief system of the corporate deadlock in our country is put forward at the same time.
【学位授予单位】：宁波大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.91
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 罗培新;;填补公司合同“缝隙”——司法介入公司运作的一个分析框架[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2007年01期
2 杨明;;请求权、私权救济与民事权利体系[J];比较法研究;2007年04期
3 刘敏;;关于股东请求解散公司之诉若干问题的思考[J];法律适用;2006年10期
4 宋从文;;公司章程的合同解读[J];法律适用;2007年02期
5 杨秀清;;论司法过程的权利生成功能 以民事权利救济为视角的分析[J];法律适用;2007年11期
6 鲍为民;美国法上的公司僵局处理制度及其启示[J];法商研究;2005年03期
7 蒋大兴;;公司自治与裁判宽容——新《公司法》视野下的裁判思维[J];法学家;2006年06期
8 王仁富;;公司司法解散制度探析——兼评我国新公司法第183条[J];中国工商管理研究;2007年04期
9 万国华;原俊婧;;论破解公司僵局之路径选择及其对公司治理的影响——兼论新《公司法》第75条和第183条之公司治理解读[J];河北法学;2007年04期
10 黄长营;谭素青;;公司僵局司法强制解散程序初探[J];河北法学;2007年06期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 广东省佛山市禅城区人民法院 孙谦 李舒啸;[N];人民法院报;2006年
，本文编号：2227172
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/2227172.html
