我国有限责任公司股东除名制度的完善
发布时间：2018-10-24 10:00
【摘要】：公司在对外经营发展中,股东之间难免会因为对事务的不同决策而产生分歧,或者股东在管理公司事务时因个人的行为使公司陷入困境或者损害了公司的利益。股东除名制度是通过法定程序将解除个别离心股东资格使其离开公司以解决公司内部矛盾,有助于公司脱离困境,使公司恢复正常运作。我国《公司法解释(三)》第17条首次规定了特定情形下解除股东资格的规则,但该条解释对股东除名的实体要件与程序要件都设计的较为粗浅,造成公司在适用除名制度中处于被动地位,也使得法院在审理除名案件中缺乏具体的依据造成同案不同判的现象。因此,本篇论文通过从一个经典案例引出建立股东除名制度的必要性,其次对这一概念进行简要阐述,接着对我国目前所设立的股东除名的相关规定进行分析并通过总结案例阐明股东除名制度在实际适用时所产生的争议,然后对域外国家主要是德国和美国的立法与司法实践进行比较,最后侧重在除名事由、除名程序以及除名后相关主体的保护救济来完善股东除名制度。
[Abstract]:In the development of the company's external operation, it is inevitable for the shareholders to have differences because of different decisions on the affairs, or because of the personal behavior of the shareholders in managing the affairs of the company, the company gets into difficulties or damages the interests of the company. The system of shareholder delisting is to remove the individual centrifugal shareholder qualification from the company through legal procedure to solve the internal contradiction of the company and to help the company get out of the predicament and make the company return to normal operation. Article 17 of our country's Company Law interpretation (3) for the first time provides the rules for disqualification of shareholders under certain circumstances, but the interpretation of this article designs the substantive and procedural elements for the removal of shareholders from the company for the first time. As a result, the company is in a passive position in the application of delisting system, and it also makes the court lack of specific basis in the hearing of delisting cases, resulting in the phenomenon of different judgments in the same case. Therefore, this paper draws the necessity of establishing the shareholder delisting system from a classic case, and then gives a brief explanation of this concept. Then it analyzes the relevant provisions of shareholder delisting established in our country and illustrates the disputes arising from the practical application of shareholder delisting system through summing up cases. Then it compares the legislation and judicial practice between Germany and the United States, and finally focuses on perfecting the shareholder delisting system in terms of the reasons for delisting, the procedure of delisting and the protection and relief of relevant subjects after delisting.
【学位授予单位】：青岛大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.291.91
本文编号：2291061
[Abstract]:In the development of the company's external operation, it is inevitable for the shareholders to have differences because of different decisions on the affairs, or because of the personal behavior of the shareholders in managing the affairs of the company, the company gets into difficulties or damages the interests of the company. The system of shareholder delisting is to remove the individual centrifugal shareholder qualification from the company through legal procedure to solve the internal contradiction of the company and to help the company get out of the predicament and make the company return to normal operation. Article 17 of our country's Company Law interpretation (3) for the first time provides the rules for disqualification of shareholders under certain circumstances, but the interpretation of this article designs the substantive and procedural elements for the removal of shareholders from the company for the first time. As a result, the company is in a passive position in the application of delisting system, and it also makes the court lack of specific basis in the hearing of delisting cases, resulting in the phenomenon of different judgments in the same case. Therefore, this paper draws the necessity of establishing the shareholder delisting system from a classic case, and then gives a brief explanation of this concept. Then it analyzes the relevant provisions of shareholder delisting established in our country and illustrates the disputes arising from the practical application of shareholder delisting system through summing up cases. Then it compares the legislation and judicial practice between Germany and the United States, and finally focuses on perfecting the shareholder delisting system in terms of the reasons for delisting, the procedure of delisting and the protection and relief of relevant subjects after delisting.
【学位授予单位】：青岛大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.291.91
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李红润;;股东除名规则的反思与重构[J];天津法学;2016年03期
2 陈克;;再论股东除名制度中的表决权限制——从填补法律漏洞视角下展开[J];法律适用;2015年12期
3 黎金;;论我国有限责任公司股东除名要件——以《公司法解释三》为基础[J];法制与社会;2015年33期
4 李建伟;;有限责任公司的股东除名制度研究[J];法学评论;2015年02期
5 李红润;;股东除名事由规则的中国模式[J];理论导刊;2014年11期
6 余健;;对股东除名制度的几点思考[J];云南社会主义学院学报;2014年02期
7 戴中璧;;试论有限责任公司股东除名制度的理论基础[J];扬州大学学报(人文社会科学版);2013年05期
8 章兢兢;;浅谈我国股东除名制度[J];法制与社会;2013年10期
9 凤建军;;公司股东的“除名”与“失权”:从概念到规范[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2013年02期
10 蒋琪;秦增光;;首例股东除名制之争[J];法人;2012年11期
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 王韵;我国股东除名制度研究[D];苏州大学;2015年
2 许玉君;有限责任公司股东除名制度研究[D];湘潭大学;2013年
3 顾文凯;我国公司股东除名之诉相关问题研究[D];上海交通大学;2012年
，本文编号：2291061
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/2291061.html
