股东表决权行使法律问题研究
[Abstract]:The voting right of shareholders is the right of shareholders to participate in the company according to the shares held. The exercise of voting rights of shares affects the management decision and governance structure of the company and is one of the basic problems in the theory of company law. A systematic study on the legal issues of shareholder voting rights can provide ideas for the realization of internal democracy and the promotion of corporate operation efficiency. The main direction of the research is to guarantee and restrict the voting rights of shareholders and find the balance between fairness and justice. This article uses the comparative analysis and the value analysis method, combs our country legislation and the practice simultaneously analyzes the foreign correlation system, provides the reference for the consummation our country legislation; This paper analyzes the rank of each legal value in the concrete situation, and provides the theoretical basis for perfecting the relevant system of exercise of voting rights. As an important right of shareholders, the voting right of shareholders is a special civil right. Different from other shareholders' right, the shareholder's voting right has the common benefit of the result, it is the legal firm right enjoyed by the shareholder, and it is the right which can be exercised by the shareholder alone. Voting rights play an important role both in the external relationship between shareholders and the management of the company and in the internal relations of shareholders. The exercise of voting rights is the basic way for shareholders to realize the right to control the company, and it is also an effective means for shareholders to fight for the control of the company. In order to maintain the stability of the company's decision-making and the order of operation, shareholders should follow certain principles to exercise their voting rights. The principle of "one share, one right" of equity equality and the principle of capital majority decision derived from it are the basic principles of voting by shareholders, and together with the principle of centralized exercise, they become the general principles of exercising voting rights. Because the general principle has certain limitations under special circumstances, it will bring some negative effects, so it is necessary to analyze the situation of shareholders holding non-voting shares, multi-voting shares, zero shares, etc. The ways of the exercise of shareholders' voting rights should be amended properly according to the general principles, which will affect the realization of shareholders' rights and the efficiency of the company's management decision. The exercise of voting rights in person and acting is the most common form in practice and the basic form stipulated by law. In recent years, due to the practical needs, there are many special ways to exercise voting rights in practice, including voting trust, voting agreement and so on. Reasonable regulation helps to protect shareholders' rights and interests and realize the efficiency of corporate decision-making. With the development of the times, some new ways of exercising voting rights, such as the exercise of books and the exercise of network, should be standardized by drawing lessons from the relevant experience of foreign countries. It is necessary to restrict the exercise of voting rights under special circumstances because there are cases of shareholders abusing their voting rights in practice, which have a negative impact on the interests of other shareholders. The principle of justice, the principle of peace of interest and the principle of non-abuse of power provide the theoretical basis for the necessary restriction of voting rights. The main restrictions on shareholders' voting rights are the exercise of holding right, the exercise of cross-shareholding voting rights, the exercise of the voting rights of the company's own shares, and so on. In addition, the system of exclusion of shareholders' voting rights is an important measure to safeguard the overall interests of the company, and the relevant provisions should be perfected in our legislation.
【学位授予单位】:扬州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D922.291.91
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 邹杨;;股东表决权行使方式多样化之探讨[J];海南大学学报(人文社会科学版);2007年04期
2 张辉;;法律行为框架中的股东表决权制度探析[J];河南社会科学;2006年04期
3 危兆宾;;论公司表决权例外排除制度的制度功能与具体运行[J];时代法学;2009年01期
4 朱慈蕴;资本多数决原则与控制股东的诚信义务[J];法学研究;2004年04期
5 宋智慧;;论限制股东表决权的制度根源及途径[J];辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年04期
6 王荣华;袁晓波;;论资本多数决原则与中小股东诉权的保障[J];齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年06期
7 施天涛,孙逊;公司取得自己股份法律问题研究[J];政法论坛;2002年04期
8 梁上上;;股东表决权:公司所有与公司控制的连接点[J];中国法学;2005年03期
9 王瑞华;相互持股问题研究[J];中央财经大学学报;2003年02期
相关硕士学位论文 前7条
1 王欣;股东表决权的相关问题研究[D];华东政法学院;2006年
2 许剑波;股份有限公司股东表决权研究[D];华东政法学院;2006年
3 何苏敏;论股东表决权的行使[D];郑州大学;2006年
4 康旭;限制控股股东表决权制度研究[D];吉林大学;2007年
5 杨富琛;论我国股东表决权网络行使的法律机制[D];中国政法大学;2007年
6 姜子敬;股份有限公司股东表决权制度若干问题研究[D];吉林大学;2008年
7 伍艳;论公司相互持股的法律规制[D];重庆大学;2009年
本文编号:2319403
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongsifalunwen/2319403.html