股东大会决议瑕疵救济制度研究

发布时间：2018-11-21 11:45

【摘要】：由公司最高权力机构股东大会对公司的重要事项所做出的代表公司意思表示的决议就是股东大会决议。鉴于该决议的重要性和权威性,该决议宣示的内容以及做出过程中所经历的程序,皆应合法合理。不然就会出现实质或者程序违反法律、行政法规或者公司章程的情形,进而对决议的效力产生一定的负面影响,也就出现了股东大会决议瑕疵。面对决议瑕疵和问题的出现,公司或是股东、董事会等公司机构若通过一定的救济途径及时进行补救,股东大会决议的效力将得到一定的治愈和恢复,若经过救济途径后瑕疵仍不能被治愈,股东大会决议将面临被撤销、认定无效等否定性裁判,因而补救对股东大会决议瑕疵制度尤为重要,是瑕疵恢复与否的关键。也就是说,若无瑕疵存在,也就没有补救之必要。当今世界上多数国家都建立了关于决议瑕疵的制度体系,我国也不例外。但是,我国《公司法》对该制度的立法规定,相比国外立法规定以及国内外的理论研究,还略显笼统和粗糙。尤其是瑕疵救济制度,尚有很多不完善的地方,应当加以完善。其中诉前救济主要是对瑕疵效力的一种补正和治愈,以恢复决议本应有的效力,包括瑕疵治愈制度、决议撤回和追认制度、异议请求权制度;直接诉讼和派生诉讼是讼诉救济的两种方式。本文通过介绍股东大会决议以及股东大会决议瑕疵展开全文,并引入了世界各地对处理股东大会决议瑕疵问题的两种不同观点,即“二分法”和“三分法”。由于我国现有的法律制度中并没有规定决议的不成立,所以在确定了瑕疵决议的法律后果之后,文章详细阐述了造成决议不成立的情况,主要涉及股东大会会议程序的瑕疵。此外,对股东大会决议内容的瑕疵,有重点的进行了介绍。最后,提出了救济瑕疵决议的诸多方法。
[Abstract]:The resolution made by the shareholders' general meeting of the supreme authority of the company to represent the meaning of the company is the resolution of the shareholders' meeting. In view of the importance and authority of the resolution, the content of the resolution and the procedures experienced in the course of its implementation should be lawful and reasonable. Otherwise, there will be substantive or procedural violations of the law, administrative regulations or company articles of association, which will have a certain negative impact on the effectiveness of the resolution, and there will be defects in the resolution of the shareholders' general meeting. Faced with the appearance of resolution flaws and problems, if the company, shareholders, board of directors and other company organizations make timely remedies through certain relief channels, the effectiveness of the resolution of the shareholders' general meeting will be cured and restored to a certain extent. If the defect can not be cured after the remedy, the resolution of the shareholders' general meeting will face the negative judgment such as rescission and invalidation, so the remedy is particularly important to the defect system of the resolution of the shareholders' general meeting, and is the key to the restoration of the defect or not. In other words, if there is no defect, there is no need to remedy. Nowadays, most countries in the world have established the system of resolution flaws, and our country is no exception. However, compared with the foreign legislation and the domestic and foreign theoretical research, the legislative provisions of this system in the Company Law of our country are still slightly general and rough. In particular, there are still many imperfections in the defect remedy system, which should be improved. The remedy before lawsuit is mainly a kind of remedy and cure to the effect of defect, in order to restore the effect that the resolution should have, including the system of defect cure, the system of withdrawal and ratification of the resolution, and the system of the right of claim of dissent. Direct action and derivative action are two ways of litigation relief. This paper introduces the full text of the resolution of shareholders' general meeting and the defect of resolution of general meeting of shareholders, and introduces two different views on dealing with the defect of resolution of general meeting of shareholders all over the world, namely "dichotomy" and "three-point method". Since the existing legal system of our country does not provide for the non-establishment of the resolution, after determining the legal consequences of the defective resolution, the article expounds in detail the situation that caused the resolution not to be established, mainly involving the defects of the procedure of the shareholders' general meeting. In addition, the shareholders' general meeting of the content of the defects, have a focus on the introduction. Finally, many methods to remedy the defect resolution are put forward.
【学位授予单位】：山西财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【相似文献】