《鹿特丹规则》下海运履约方法律地位研究

发布时间：2018-07-15 14:47

【摘要】：随着经济全球化的到来,国际贸易的发展,海运在国际货物运输中所占比列越来越重,实际上成为国际货物运输最主要的方式。而规定国际货物运输的国际公约最新的也是1978年的《汉堡规则》。应时代发展的要求,《鹿特丹规则》应运而生。于是在1999年,国际海事委员会接受联合国国际贸易法委员会的委托,专门成立了运输法分委会对此进行研究,2008年12月11日联合国第六十三届会议通过了《联合国全程或部分海上国际货物运输合同公约》,定名为《鹿特丹规则》。2009年9月23日,已有15个国家签署了该公约,并在之后又取得了其他5个国家的签约。该公约对比之前两个公约有许多创新之处,海运履约方是其中一处。这一概念的提出,将装卸两港的装卸公司、仓储公司以及港内运输等履行或承诺履行承运人责任的人包括进来,使其也可以享受承运人的责任限制、免责等权利和抗辩,促进现代物流业的发展,对于明确各责任主体的责任,澄清复杂的国际海上运输法律关系有重大的意义。本文分为三个部分。首先从海运履约方的渊源、定义、范围等基本知识入手,讨论海运履约方与相关概念的区别。其次,主要探讨海运履约方的法律地位问题,包括海运履约方的权利、义务、责任等问题。最后,结合《鹿特丹规则》中有关海运履约方的规定,提出对我国相关立法的反思及建议。
[Abstract]:With the arrival of economic globalization and the development of international trade, the proportion of sea transportation in international cargo transportation is becoming more and more heavy, in fact, it has become the most important way of international freight transportation. The latest international convention governing the international carriage of goods is the Hamburg rules of 1978. In response to the development of the times, the Rotterdam Rule came into being. Thus, in 1999, the International Maritime Commission accepted the mandate of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, The United Nations, at its 63 session, on 11 December 2008, adopted the United Nations Convention on contracts for the International Carriage of goods wholly or partly by Sea, known as the Rotterdam rules. 23 September 2009, Fifteen countries have signed the Convention, and five others have since signed it. The Convention contrasts with many innovations in the previous two conventions, among which maritime performing parties are one. This concept is proposed to include persons who perform or undertake to perform the carrier's responsibilities, such as loading and unloading companies, warehousing companies and in-port transport, so that they may also enjoy the carrier's rights and defences, such as limitation of liability, exemption from liability, etc. To promote the development of modern logistics industry is of great significance to clarify the responsibilities of each responsible subject and clarify the complex legal relationship of international maritime transport. This paper is divided into three parts. Firstly, the difference between maritime performing party and related concepts is discussed from the basic knowledge of the origin, definition and scope of maritime performing party. Secondly, it mainly discusses the legal status of maritime performing parties, including the rights, obligations and responsibilities of maritime performing parties. Finally, combined with the provisions of the Rotterdam rules about maritime performing parties, the author puts forward some reflections and suggestions on the relevant legislation of our country.
【学位授予单位】：中国海洋大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D996.19

【相似文献】