商标权平行进口的经济分析
发布时间：2018-09-11 18:28
【摘要】：商标权平行进口不单纯是知识产权领域的问题,它还涉及国际贸易和自由竞争等方面的问题。由商标产品平行进口而引发的法律冲突不仅表现在其是否构成了商标侵权,而且表现在商标产品平行进口是否构成了不正当竞争而侵犯了消费者的利益,以及因平行进口而导致的商标所有人同商标使用人之间的权利冲突。因此,对于由商标权平行进口而产生问题的探讨和研究应摆脱知识产权的局限性,从国际贸易规则、消费者权益的保护以及反不正当竞争法等更加广阔的领域进行分析和研究,以便提出更为科学、合理的法律解决机制。
[Abstract]:Parallel import of trademark rights is not only a problem in the field of intellectual property, but also related to international trade and free competition. The conflict of laws caused by the parallel import of trademark products is not only manifested in whether it constitutes trademark infringement, but also in whether the parallel import of trademark products constitutes unfair competition and infringes the interests of consumers. And the conflict of rights between trademark owner and trademark user caused by parallel import. Therefore, the discussion and research on the problems arising from the parallel import of trademark rights should get rid of the limitations of intellectual property rights and carry out analysis and research in the broader fields of international trade rules, the protection of consumers' rights and interests, and the anti-unfair competition law. In order to put forward a more scientific, reasonable legal settlement mechanism.
【作者单位】： 北方民族大学法学院;
【分类号】：D997.1
[Abstract]:Parallel import of trademark rights is not only a problem in the field of intellectual property, but also related to international trade and free competition. The conflict of laws caused by the parallel import of trademark products is not only manifested in whether it constitutes trademark infringement, but also in whether the parallel import of trademark products constitutes unfair competition and infringes the interests of consumers. And the conflict of rights between trademark owner and trademark user caused by parallel import. Therefore, the discussion and research on the problems arising from the parallel import of trademark rights should get rid of the limitations of intellectual property rights and carry out analysis and research in the broader fields of international trade rules, the protection of consumers' rights and interests, and the anti-unfair competition law. In order to put forward a more scientific, reasonable legal settlement mechanism.
【作者单位】： 北方民族大学法学院;
【分类号】：D997.1
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 郑建滨;;竞价排名关键词与商标侵权判定[J];知识经济;2010年02期
2 董新凯;;对驰名商标“异化”的另一种认识[J];现代经济探讨;2010年01期
3 吴杰;;刍议商标的反向假冒[J];经济研究导刊;2010年03期
4 钦国巍;;建构商标的合理使用制度[J];内蒙古电大学刊;2010年01期
5 邓宏光;;我国驰名商标反淡化制度应当缓行[J];法学;2010年02期
6 刘润涛;;贴牌生产中商标使用的法律性质[J];中华商标;2010年01期
7 ;国外简讯[J];电子知识产权;2010年02期
8 祝建军;;“旧手机换新壳”侵犯注册商标专用权[J];企业科技与发展;2010年05期
9 徐聪颖;;论商标符号表彰功能的内涵及其法律保护[J];商业时代;2010年09期
10 徐聪颖;;制度的困境及其出路——由“LV”商标侵权案所引发的思考[J];特区经济;2010年04期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 龚时薇;许q，
本文编号：2237511
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2237511.html
