海事请求类型化下船舶扣押管辖权审视
发布时间：2018-10-21 13:45
【摘要】：作为"对物诉讼"和财产保全理论互为折中和协调的产物,船舶扣押管辖权的启动是基于法定的特定范围,即由海事事由引发的海事请求。理解和优化船舶扣押管辖权具有不同的进路,即可扣押船舶范围的界定、错误扣押船舶的救济以及明确海事请求的种类。然而,在海事请求类型化日益盛行、"对物诉讼"模式日渐式微以及航运实践中特定船舶扣押意旨的趋向下,海事请求的类型化以优化船舶扣押管辖权程序成为必然。凸显海事请求的类型化以优化船舶扣押管辖权程序的启动并不是一个孤立的问题。重视当事人的披露义务和强化法院的审慎性审查责任,成为构建富有可行性和合理性的船舶扣押管辖权体系的应然进路。
[Abstract]:As the result of compromise and coordination between action in rem and property preservation theory, the initiation of ship arrest jurisdiction is based on the specific scope of law, that is, maritime claim initiated by maritime cause. To understand and optimize the jurisdiction of ship arrest has different approaches, that is to say, the definition of the scope of arrest, the relief of the wrong arrest of the ship and the definition of the type of maritime claim. However, with the increasing popularity of the classification of maritime claims, the declining pattern of "action in rem" and the tendency of specific ship arrest intention in shipping practice, the classification of maritime claims to optimize the procedures of ship arrest jurisdiction becomes inevitable. It is not an isolated problem to highlight the classification of maritime claims in order to optimize the initiation of ship arrest jurisdiction procedure. Paying attention to the disclosure obligation of the parties and strengthening the court's duty to examine prudently is the way to construct a feasible and reasonable system of ship arrest jurisdiction.
【作者单位】： 华东政法大学国际法学院;
【基金】：上海市社科规划一般项目(2015BFX003) 司法部重点课题(16SFB1007) 中国海洋发展研究会重点项目(CAMAZD201608)
【分类号】：D996.19
本文编号：2285257
[Abstract]:As the result of compromise and coordination between action in rem and property preservation theory, the initiation of ship arrest jurisdiction is based on the specific scope of law, that is, maritime claim initiated by maritime cause. To understand and optimize the jurisdiction of ship arrest has different approaches, that is to say, the definition of the scope of arrest, the relief of the wrong arrest of the ship and the definition of the type of maritime claim. However, with the increasing popularity of the classification of maritime claims, the declining pattern of "action in rem" and the tendency of specific ship arrest intention in shipping practice, the classification of maritime claims to optimize the procedures of ship arrest jurisdiction becomes inevitable. It is not an isolated problem to highlight the classification of maritime claims in order to optimize the initiation of ship arrest jurisdiction procedure. Paying attention to the disclosure obligation of the parties and strengthening the court's duty to examine prudently is the way to construct a feasible and reasonable system of ship arrest jurisdiction.
【作者单位】： 华东政法大学国际法学院;
【基金】：上海市社科规划一般项目(2015BFX003) 司法部重点课题(16SFB1007) 中国海洋发展研究会重点项目(CAMAZD201608)
【分类号】：D996.19
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 ;消息报道[J];航海科技动态;1999年05期
2 单红军;;为何不在国内申请扣押“海娜”号[J];中国船检;2013年10期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 李楠;论海事请求的优先顺位[D];大连海事大学;2004年
2 王冬;船舶扣押法律问题探析[D];厦门大学;2008年
，本文编号：2285257
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2285257.html
