《纽约公约》下国际商事仲裁协议的效力研究
发布时间：2018-11-12 17:11
【摘要】：经济全球化已成为不可逆转大趋势,在此背景下,我国涉外民商事往来过程中的纠纷也随着日趋增多。而作为解决国际上民商事主体纠纷的国际民商事仲裁(下文如无说明,“仲裁”即是指“国际民商事仲裁”,“仲裁协议”即是指“国际民商事仲裁协议”)受到国内外的广泛认可和承认,因为仲裁是高效解决国内外商事争议的途径之一,具有广泛国际性、高度自治性、裁决权威性、执行强制、快速的特点。在仲裁开始与执行中,仲裁的基石是当事人达成一致意见的仲裁条款或仲裁协议。这主要是指当事人多方或双方在平等、自愿、互利、共同商量的前提之下,将所涉及到的争端提交仲裁庭或仲裁机构仲裁,请求其作为中间组织来解决问题的口头或书面文件。因此,在国内外仲裁实践中,首要要解决的是如何认定仲裁协议的效力的问题,这对于解决国际民商事仲裁纠纷显得极为重要。本文拟通过具体的实践和理论分析,说明随着国际贸易发展和国际民商事仲裁实践中不断涌现的问题,对认定国际民商事仲裁协议效力的判断与规定上《纽约公约》存在不足与缺漏,已不能满足仲裁发展的需要,在实践中对如何认定仲裁协议的效力又出现了新问题、新情况;进而进一步从我国法律规定的现状、仲裁理论的滞后性以及仲裁实践中出现的具体操作问题等方面来深入分析我国仲裁机构在认定国际民商事仲裁协议效力方面的不足、缺漏与存在的问题;并通过研究域外具有代表性的国家的成熟的立法经验和实践成果,对我国仲裁的发展与完善提出建设性、具体性、创造性的意见。本文详细的论述可分为四部分,其中第一部分内容以叙述《纽约公约》对国际商事仲裁协议效力的相关规定来进入主题、展开分析;第二部分介绍执行《纽约公约》的域外经验,主要从美国、英国、法国的相关实践来分析;第三部分笔者会详述在以公约和国内仲裁法审查和判断仲裁协议效力方面我国的现状和遇到的问题;最后一部分阐述如何吸取国内外经验教训,完善我国仲裁协议效力的认定规则,以及完善我国商事仲裁的立法体系,促进社会经济生活发展以及公平高效解决争议。
[Abstract]:Economic globalization has become an irreversible trend. Under this background, disputes in the process of civil and commercial exchanges involving foreign countries in China are increasing day by day. And international civil and commercial arbitration, as a solution to disputes between civil and commercial subjects, (if not explained below, "arbitration" means "international civil and commercial arbitration"; "arbitration" means "international civil and commercial arbitration"; "arbitration" means "international civil and commercial arbitration"; "Arbitration Agreement" refers to the "International Civil and Commercial Arbitration Agreement", which is widely recognized and recognized at home and abroad, because arbitration is one of the effective ways to resolve commercial disputes at home and abroad. It has broad international character, a high degree of autonomy and authority of adjudication. The characteristic of enforcement and speed. In the beginning and execution of arbitration, the cornerstone of arbitration is an arbitration clause or an arbitration agreement reached by the parties. This mainly refers to the parties or parties on the premise of equality, voluntary, mutual benefit and joint consultation, submit the disputes involved to the arbitration tribunal or arbitration institution for arbitration, and request them to solve the problem as an intermediary organization orally or in writing. Therefore, in the practice of arbitration at home and abroad, the most important problem is how to determine the validity of the arbitration agreement, which is very important for the settlement of international civil and commercial arbitration disputes. In this paper, through the specific practice and theoretical analysis, the paper explains the problems that have emerged in the international trade development and the practice of international civil and commercial arbitration. In the judgment and regulation of the validity of the International Civil and Commercial Arbitration Agreement, the New York Convention has shortcomings and gaps, which can not meet the needs of the development of arbitration. In practice, there are new problems and new situations on how to determine the validity of the arbitration agreement. Furthermore, from the aspects of the current situation of our country's laws and regulations, the lag of the arbitration theory and the concrete operation problems in the arbitration practice, this paper further analyzes the deficiency of our country's arbitration institutions in determining the validity of the international civil and commercial arbitration agreement. Gaps and problems; By studying the mature legislative experience and practical achievements of overseas representative countries, this paper puts forward constructive, concrete and creative opinions on the development and perfection of arbitration in China. This paper can be divided into four parts in detail, the first part of the content to describe the provisions of the New York Convention on the effectiveness of international commercial arbitration agreement to enter the theme, analysis; The second part introduces the extraterritorial experience of the implementation of the New York Convention, mainly from the United States, the United Kingdom, France to analyze the relevant practice; In the third part, the author will expound the current situation and problems of our country in reviewing and judging the validity of arbitration agreement by convention and domestic arbitration law. The last part expounds how to draw lessons from domestic and foreign experiences, perfect the rules of confirming the validity of arbitration agreement in our country, perfect the legislative system of commercial arbitration in our country, promote the development of social economic life and resolve disputes fairly and efficiently.
【学位授予单位】：宁波大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D997.4
本文编号：2327694
[Abstract]:Economic globalization has become an irreversible trend. Under this background, disputes in the process of civil and commercial exchanges involving foreign countries in China are increasing day by day. And international civil and commercial arbitration, as a solution to disputes between civil and commercial subjects, (if not explained below, "arbitration" means "international civil and commercial arbitration"; "arbitration" means "international civil and commercial arbitration"; "arbitration" means "international civil and commercial arbitration"; "Arbitration Agreement" refers to the "International Civil and Commercial Arbitration Agreement", which is widely recognized and recognized at home and abroad, because arbitration is one of the effective ways to resolve commercial disputes at home and abroad. It has broad international character, a high degree of autonomy and authority of adjudication. The characteristic of enforcement and speed. In the beginning and execution of arbitration, the cornerstone of arbitration is an arbitration clause or an arbitration agreement reached by the parties. This mainly refers to the parties or parties on the premise of equality, voluntary, mutual benefit and joint consultation, submit the disputes involved to the arbitration tribunal or arbitration institution for arbitration, and request them to solve the problem as an intermediary organization orally or in writing. Therefore, in the practice of arbitration at home and abroad, the most important problem is how to determine the validity of the arbitration agreement, which is very important for the settlement of international civil and commercial arbitration disputes. In this paper, through the specific practice and theoretical analysis, the paper explains the problems that have emerged in the international trade development and the practice of international civil and commercial arbitration. In the judgment and regulation of the validity of the International Civil and Commercial Arbitration Agreement, the New York Convention has shortcomings and gaps, which can not meet the needs of the development of arbitration. In practice, there are new problems and new situations on how to determine the validity of the arbitration agreement. Furthermore, from the aspects of the current situation of our country's laws and regulations, the lag of the arbitration theory and the concrete operation problems in the arbitration practice, this paper further analyzes the deficiency of our country's arbitration institutions in determining the validity of the international civil and commercial arbitration agreement. Gaps and problems; By studying the mature legislative experience and practical achievements of overseas representative countries, this paper puts forward constructive, concrete and creative opinions on the development and perfection of arbitration in China. This paper can be divided into four parts in detail, the first part of the content to describe the provisions of the New York Convention on the effectiveness of international commercial arbitration agreement to enter the theme, analysis; The second part introduces the extraterritorial experience of the implementation of the New York Convention, mainly from the United States, the United Kingdom, France to analyze the relevant practice; In the third part, the author will expound the current situation and problems of our country in reviewing and judging the validity of arbitration agreement by convention and domestic arbitration law. The last part expounds how to draw lessons from domestic and foreign experiences, perfect the rules of confirming the validity of arbitration agreement in our country, perfect the legislative system of commercial arbitration in our country, promote the development of social economic life and resolve disputes fairly and efficiently.
【学位授予单位】：宁波大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D997.4
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杨文升;张虎;;论《纽约公约》下仲裁协议效力的确定——以“默示仲裁协议”为视角[J];法学杂志;2015年04期
2 李晶;;国际商事仲裁中临时措施在中国的新发展——以民诉法修改和仲裁规则修订为视角[J];西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2014年06期
3 尉宁;;论《纽约公约》框架下我国的执行及存在的问题[J];法制与社会;2014年13期
4 周振;;论我国在国际商事仲裁中承认临时仲裁的立法必要性[J];法制与社会;2014年05期
5 刘丹;;国际法在国际商事仲裁中的法律适用问题[J];云南大学学报(法学版);2011年05期
6 赵秀文;;从相关案例看ICC仲裁院裁决在我国的承认与执行[J];法学;2010年03期
7 杨弘磊;;人民法院涉外仲裁司法审查情况的调研报告[J];武大国际法评论;2009年01期
8 万鄂湘;;《纽约公约》在中国的司法实践[J];法律适用;2009年03期
9 乔欣;;中外商事仲裁司法监督范围的比较与借鉴[J];法制与经济(下旬刊);2009年02期
10 曾诚;;试论机构仲裁框架下的临时仲裁制度——以新加坡国际仲裁中心仲裁规则的修改为视角[J];法制与社会;2008年05期
，本文编号：2327694
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2327694.html
