当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 合同法论文 >

继续性合同法律问题研究

发布时间:2018-02-28 10:31

  本文关键词: 继续性合同 抗辩权 合同终止 出处:《宁波大学》2012年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:基尔克提出“继续性债之关系”的概念之后,学者们纷纷开始研究与探讨,提出了自己的认识,继续性合同基本理论于是在德国法中发展成熟。我国立法并未引进继续性合同的概念及其相关理论,学者们对其研究的广度和深度也还很有限,仅限于继续性合同的解除或者继续性合同的抗辩权适用等单一方面的研究,缺少系统论述的文章。因此,笔者将继续性合同作为研究对象,对继续性合同基本理论从整体上进行一次梳理和分析,,重点针对我国实践中继续性合同所存在的问题提出自己的认识和见解,希望能为完善继续性合同基本理论献出微薄之力。全文分为四个部分。 第一部分主要探讨的是继续性合同的概念,通过对国内外学者关于继续性合同的概念进行分析比较,得出最具科学性的定义。并将之与长期合同、关系性合同等概念进行了对比,同时阐述了继续性合同的类型,这是本文进行研究的理论前提。只有准确把握继续性合同的涵义和其类型,才能对继续性合同有深刻的理解,明确其在合同法基础理论中的地位和存在价值。 第二部分分析继续性合同中的抗辩权问题。抗辩权在继续性合同中具有特殊性,本部分分别讨论了继续性合同中的先履行抗辩权、不安抗辩权和时效抗辩权。关于继续性合同与先履行抗辩权和不安抗辩权之间的关系,理论界存在着分歧,所以需要厘清它们之间的关系及其适用问题。同时,对于继续性合同诉讼时效的期间起算点也是值得研究的。 第三部分主要介绍继续性合同的终止制度。从继续性合同终止制度的法理基础入手,分析比较合同的终止制度和解除制度之间的关系以及国内外不同国家的规范模式,划分出继续性合同终止制度的类型。继续性合同终止的原因有哪些?进而讨论继续性合同终止的法律后果问题,针对在理论上和实践中带来的一些问题,提出对合同终止制度更好的完善建议。 第四部分重点论述继续性合同的违约责任。面对继续性合同的违约情形,合同目的应该如何更好地实现?根据继续性合同的特点,笔者对其进行经济学的分析,探讨继续性合同违约责任的承担方式及其适用问题,如实际履行和损害赔偿,主要是对合同赔偿的范围进行分析,试图为完善继续性合同的违约责任制度找到解决的办法。
[Abstract]:After Kirk put forward the concept of "the relationship of continuing sexual debt", scholars began to study and discuss it one after another, and put forward their own understanding. Therefore, the basic theory of continuing contract has developed and matured in German law. The concept of continuing contract and its related theories have not been introduced into our legislation, and the scope and depth of their research are also very limited. It is only limited to the study of the rescission of the continuing contract or the application of the defense right of the continuance contract, but there is no systematic discussion of the article. Therefore, the author regards the continuance contract as the object of study. The basic theory of continuing contract is combed and analyzed as a whole, focusing on the problems existing in the practice of our country. The paper is divided into four parts. The first part mainly discusses the concept of continuing contract, through the analysis and comparison of the domestic and foreign scholars about the concept of continuing contract, we get the most scientific definition, and compare it with long-term contract. The concept of relational contract is compared, and the type of continuing contract is expounded, which is the theoretical premise of this paper. Only by accurately grasping the meaning and type of continuing contract, can we have a profound understanding of continuing contract. Clarify its position and existence value in the basic theory of contract law. The second part analyzes the question of the right of defense in the contract of continuance. The right of defense is special in the contract of continuance. This part discusses the defense right of first performance in the contract of continuance. Concerning the relationship between the continuation contract and the prior performance defense and the restless defense, there are differences in the theoretical circle, so it is necessary to clarify the relationship between them and their application. The starting point of the limitation period for continuing contracts is also worth studying. The third part mainly introduces the termination system of the continuing contract. Starting with the legal basis of the termination system of the continuing contract, it analyzes and compares the relationship between the termination system of the contract and the cancellation system, as well as the normative models of different countries at home and abroad. What are the reasons for the termination of a continuing contract? Then it discusses the legal consequences of the termination of a continuing contract, and puts forward better suggestions for the perfection of the system of termination of the contract in view of the problems brought about in theory and practice. Part 4th focuses on the liability for breach of contract of continuing contract. In the face of breach of contract of continuing contract, how should the purpose of contract be better realized? According to the characteristics of continuing contract, the author makes an economic analysis of it, and probes into the way of liability for breach of contract and its application, such as actual performance and compensation for damages, mainly to analyze the scope of contract compensation. This paper tries to find a solution for perfecting the liability system of breach of contract.
【学位授予单位】:宁波大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D923.6

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 宁踢坡;合同解除溯及力探讨——兼论合同终止[J];当代法学;2003年08期

2 李玉文;论继续性合同中的抗辩权[J];法商研究;2004年03期

3 陈芳;德国劳动合同终止制度与我国劳动合同解除制度之比较[J];法学;1998年04期

4 董微;合同解除和终止辨析[J];广东社会科学;2000年06期

5 郝郁;国际LNG贸易合同及定价研究[J];国际石油经济;2004年12期

6 韩立强;徐燕华;;合同解除溯及力之反思与重构[J];河南商业高等专科学校学报;2007年03期

7 崔建远;;履行抗辩权探微[J];法学研究;2007年03期

8 陈永福;陈奇伟;程灏;;合同违约责任法律救济措施的经济学思考[J];南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版);2006年03期

9 万挺;;继续性合同解除若干实务问题探讨[J];人民司法;2008年22期

10 栾志红;关于继续性合同的几个问题[J];法学论坛;2002年05期

相关博士学位论文 前2条

1 张红;继续性合同终止制度研究[D];湖南大学;2011年

2 孙秋枫;合同法的经济学分析[D];吉林大学;2008年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 於昆;继续性合同理论问题研究[D];浙江大学;2011年

2 覃红卫;双务合同履行抗辩权制度论析[D];湘潭大学;2002年

3 严刚;同时履行抗辩权与双方违约研究[D];四川大学;2003年

4 韩立强;合同解除制度若干问题比较研究[D];上海海事大学;2005年

5 缪欢;合同解除效力探究[D];华东政法学院;2006年

6 张志恒;论合同的不适当履行[D];郑州大学;2007年

7 薛晓蓉;事实契约理论研究[D];安徽大学;2007年

8 陈探;论长期合同调整[D];清华大学;2007年

9 瞿涵;论合同之债履行不能的界定[D];中国政法大学;2008年

10 李凡;合同解除溯及力问题研究[D];西南政法大学;2009年



本文编号:1546926

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/1546926.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户4721f***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com