我国缔约过失责任赔偿范围研究
发布时间:2018-03-04 02:07
本文选题:缔约过失责任 切入点:信赖利益 出处:《华中科技大学》2013年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:缔约过失责任制度是债法理论发展的一个重要体现,相比于其他制度形成较晚,被汉斯·德勒教授誉为“法学上的发现”。这项制度确认了缔约双方因其缔约行为产生的一种类契约的信赖关系,平衡了诚信原则与意思自由之间的矛盾,在经济活动中弘扬诚实信用、保护交易安全起到了十分重要的作用。 我国1999年颁布出台的《合同法》,其中第42条和第43条对缔约过失责任制度作了专门的规定。但由于没有具体的、具备可操作性的规定,致使在缔约过失责任纠纷案件中,损害赔偿的范围一时难以有定论。本文遂以对于理论、条文与案例的全面整理、比较和分析,进行一些有说服力的讨论。 笔者以为,缔约过失责任是一种独立的请求权。在这一点上,,它和违约责任、侵权责任相同,都是债的发生一种原因。其赔偿的对象除了信赖利益,固有利益同样应该纳入缔约过失责任保护客体的范围内。其中,对于信赖利益的赔偿,应当同时包括直接利益损失与间接利益损失,所谓间接利益损失,主要是指机会利益损失。笔者同时认为,对信赖利益的赔偿应进行原则性的限制,即“最高不得超过履行利益,法律另有规定的除外”。所谓另有规定,主要针对“缔约过程中缔约方遭受人身、财产等固有利益损害”以及“在加害人存在欺诈、恶意等特殊情况下,法律规定受害人可以获得惩罚性赔偿”的情况以及其他法律明文规定有惩罚性赔偿的情况。
[Abstract]:The system of fault liability in contracting is an important embodiment of the development of the theory of debt law, which is later formed than other systems. What Professor Hance Deller called a "discovery in law," a system that confirmed the trust of a type of contract between the contracting parties as a result of their contracting actions, and balanced the contradiction between the principle of good faith and the freedom of will. Promoting honesty and credit in economic activities and protecting transaction security have played a very important role. In 1999, the contract Law was promulgated in China, in which articles 42 and 43 made special provisions on the system of fault liability in contracting. However, due to the lack of specific and operable provisions, it has resulted in disputes over fault liability in contracting cases. The scope of compensation for damages is difficult to come to a conclusion. This paper makes some persuasive discussions on the comprehensive arrangement, comparison and analysis of theories, articles and cases. The author thinks that the liability for fault in contracting is an independent right of claim. At this point, it is the same as the liability for breach of contract and the liability for tort, which is a reason for the occurrence of the debt. The inherent interests should also be included in the scope of the object of protection of the fault liability in contracting. The compensation for the trust interest should include both direct and indirect loss of interest, so called indirect interest loss, At the same time, the author believes that compensation for reliance interests should be restricted in principle, that is, "the maximum amount shall not exceed the performing interest, unless otherwise provided by law". Focusing on "the parties suffered damage to the inherent interests of persons, property, etc. In the course of contracting" and "in exceptional circumstances such as fraud and malice on the part of the perpetrator," The law provides for punitive damages for victims, as well as for cases where punitive damages are expressly provided for in other laws.
【学位授予单位】:华中科技大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D923.6
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 冉克平;;缔约过失责任性质新论——以德国学说与判例的变迁为视角[J];河北法学;2010年02期
2 崔建远;缔约上过失责任论[J];吉林大学社会科学学报;1992年03期
3 朱岩;;违反保护他人法律的过错责任[J];法学研究;2011年02期
本文编号:1563656
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/1563656.html