论继续性合同的立法缺陷及完善
发布时间:2018-04-13 18:49
本文选题:一时性合同 + 继续性合同 ; 参考:《湖南师范大学》2013年硕士论文
【摘要】:继续性合同与一时性合同是现代合同法理论的分类。继续性合同随现代经济的发展,己成为经济交易中的重要方式。但是,有关继续性合同的立法却显得有些滞后。为了有效规范继续性合同在我国法律中的适用以及维护当事人的合法利益和保障社会经济秩序的顺利进行,我国应借鉴国外有关继续性合同的立法经验以及结合自身的立法状况从以下几个方面对继续性合同的相关制度进行完善和规范:一是完善继续性合同的诉讼时效;继续性合同的每期履行具有独立性,每期都是一个独立的债权,因此其诉讼时效应按期计算。二是完善继续性合同的效力制度;依据我国《合同法》的效力制度分析,解除制度溯及既往的法律效力不能适用于继续性合同,继续性合同的解除效力应不能溯及既往,只对将来发生效力。三是完善情势变更原则在继续性合同中的适用;我国《合同法司法解释二》中第26条对情势变更原则的规定:“因适用情势变更原则而引起合同消灭的,统一适用解除制度,”事实上目前我国解除制度的效力不能适用于继续性合同,因此,对情势变更原则适用于继续性合同的规定应予以完善。四是完善抗辩权在继续性合同中的适用;依据我国《合同法》第66、67、68、69条对抗辩权的规定,同时履行抗辩权、不安抗辩权适用于继续性合同时存在着一定的不足,所以,我国立法对这两种抗辩权适用于继续性合同时要进行完善。五是完善继续性合同的消灭制度;我国立法未区分一时性合同与继续性合同,对二者的消灭制度采取了统一的解除制度,但是我国立法中的解除制度完全是围绕着一时性合同设计的,因此,目前立法中的解除制度并不能适用于继续性合同。而通过比较国外立法中继续性合同的消灭制度以及结合我国立法的实际状况,我国应将终止制度作为继续性合同的消灭制度进行规范。总之,继续性合同的规范在我国目前的《合同法》中存在明显不足,我国立法有必要对其进行完善。
[Abstract]:Continuing contract and temporary contract are the classification of modern contract law theory.With the development of modern economy, continuing contract has become an important way of economic transaction.However, the legislation on continuing contracts appears to lag behind.In order to effectively standardize the application of continuing contracts in Chinese law and safeguard the legitimate interests of the parties and ensure the smooth progress of social and economic order,Our country should learn from the legislation experience of foreign countries about continuing contract and combine its own legislative situation to perfect and standardize the relevant system of continuing contract from the following aspects: first, perfect the limitation of action of continuing contract;Each period of performance of a continuing contract is independent, and each period is an independent creditor's right, so its limitation period should be calculated on time.The second is to perfect the validity system of the continuing contract, according to the analysis of the validity system of the contract Law of our country, the legal effect of the rescission system retroactive cannot be applied to the continuing contract, and the rescinding effect of the continuing contract should not be retroactive.Only for the future.Third, to perfect the application of the principle of change of circumstances in continuing contracts. Article 26 of the Judicial interpretation of contract Law of our country stipulates the principle of change of circumstances: "if the contract is extinguished by the application of the principle of change of circumstances, the system of rescission shall be applied uniformly.""as a matter of fact, the validity of the current system of rescission in our country cannot be applied to continuing contracts, therefore, the provisions on the application of the principle of change of circumstances to continuing contracts should be perfected.Fourth, perfecting the application of the right of defense in the contract of continuance, according to the stipulation of Article 666776869 of the contract Law of our country on the right of defense, and performing the right of defense at the same time, the right of restless defense applies to the contract of continuance, therefore, there are some deficiencies in the application of the right of defense to the contract of continuance.Our country legislates to these two kinds of defense rights to apply to the continuation contract to carry on the consummation.Fifth, to perfect the system of elimination of continuing contracts, the legislation of our country has not distinguished temporary contracts from continuing contracts, and has adopted a unified system of rescission of the two systems.However, the system of rescission in the legislation of our country is completely designed around the temporary contract, therefore, the system of rescission in the current legislation can not be applied to the contract of continuance.By comparing the elimination system of continuing contract in foreign legislation and combining with the actual situation of our country's legislation, our country should regulate the termination system as the extinguishing system of continuing contract.In a word, the criterion of continuing contract is obviously deficient in contract Law of our country, it is necessary to perfect it in our country's legislation.
【学位授予单位】:湖南师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D923.6
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前5条
1 李玉文;论继续性合同中的抗辩权[J];法商研究;2004年03期
2 崔建远;;履行抗辩权探微[J];法学研究;2007年03期
3 万挺;;继续性合同解除若干实务问题探讨[J];人民司法;2008年22期
4 栾志红;关于继续性合同的几个问题[J];法学论坛;2002年05期
5 屈茂辉;张红;;继续性合同:基于合同法理与立法技术的多重考量[J];中国法学;2010年05期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 张红;继续性合同终止制度研究[D];湖南大学;2011年
,本文编号:1745749
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hetongqiyue/1745749.html