浅析意思表示解释体系构建

发布时间：2018-04-19 10:33

本文选题：意思表示 + 意思表示解释　；参考：《华东政法大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：意思表示制度作为法律行为理论的重要组成部分，同时也是法律行为的核心，虽然意思表示解释只是其中的一个分支理论，但对于理解整个意思表示，乃至于整个民法都有着极其重要的作用。然而令人遗憾的是我国立法对意思表示解释的规定零散而表面，以至于司法实践中有些问题无法找到法律出处而无从处理。本论文试图对意思表示解释理论做一次系统的梳理，并提出几点自己的看法，笔者未曾奢望将意思表示解释体系构建的十分透彻和完善，只期望这篇文章是引玉之砖，可以为后来者提供一点启发，集众人之力完善意思表示解释规则。全文共分为导言、正文三章、结语三部分，共计二万六千余字。导言部分主要介绍论文选题重要性、当前不足和研究选题的重要性。正文部分分为三个章节。分别就意思表示的基本理论即研究的基本前提、意思表示解释研究现状及完善我国意思表示解释体系建议三个方面对意思表示解释体系构建进行理论探讨。第一章首先明确意思表示的概念，辨析了其与法律行为之间的关系。其次浅谈意思表示解释的目的和对象，兼论关于意思表示解释的意思主义、表示主义、折衷主义。最后明确意思表示解释的必然性和必要性，肯定意思表示解释即是法律行为解释的前提，兼论传统理论的缺陷。第二章着重分析我国《中华人民共和国合同法》（以下简称合同法）的有关规定，同时结合《中华人民共和国民法(草案)》（以下简称《草案》）的相关规定，推导出我国在意思表示解释问题上的立场，及我国体系的不足之处。笔者首先分析比较无需受领的意思表示、需受领的意思表示的异同，其次分析所谓无意思表示的法律行为，观察、分析并总结三者在解释问题上的价值取向，并在借鉴了一些国外的立法例基础上，给出我国民法典立法上可采用“统一规定”和“一般规定”两者结合的立法模式的理由。第三章论述了如何构建意思表示解释体系的问题。首先概述了文章的总结脉络；其次提出三种对司法实践比较有指导意义的立法意思表示解释原则和具体方法规则；最后为了防止这些规则在适用的时候会相互冲突，，本文还给出了各种原则与规则之间相应的位阶。同时笔者对补充解释和修正解释的问题也进行了一定阐述。最后结语部分，总结全文给出对今后立法的希冀。
[Abstract]:As an important part of the theory of legal act, the system of expression of will is also the core of legal act. Although the interpretation of expression of intention is only one branch of the theory, it is necessary to understand the whole expression of intention.Even the entire civil law plays an extremely important role.However, it is regrettable that the provisions of Chinese legislation on the interpretation of meaning are scattered and superficial, so that some problems in judicial practice can not find the source of the law and can not be dealt with.This paper tries to do a systematic combing of the theory of meaning expression interpretation, and puts forward several points of view. The author did not expect to construct a very thorough and perfect meaning expression interpretation system, and only expected this article to be a brick of jade introduction.Can provide a little inspiration for the latecomer, gather the strength of the people to improve the interpretation of the rules of will.The full text is divided into introduction, body three chapters, conclusion three parts, a total of more than 26000 words.The introduction mainly introduces the importance of topic selection, current deficiency and the importance of research topics.The text is divided into three chapters.On the basis of the basic theory of the expression of will, the basic premise of the study, the present situation of the study on the interpretation of the expression of will and the suggestion of perfecting the interpretation system of the expression of intention in China, this paper discusses the construction of the interpretation system of the expression of intention.In the first chapter, the concept of expression of will is defined and the relationship between it and legal acts is analyzed.Secondly, it discusses the purpose and object of the interpretation of the expression of will, as well as the meaning doctrine, expressionism and eclecticism about the interpretation of intention expression.Finally, the necessity and inevitability of the interpretation of the expression of intention are clarified, and the interpretation of the positive expression of intention is the premise of the interpretation of legal acts, and the defects of the traditional theory are also discussed.The second chapter focuses on the analysis of the relevant provisions of the contract Law of the people's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the contract Law) and the relevant provisions of the Civil Law (draft) of the people's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the draft).This paper deduces the position of our country on the interpretation of the expression of intention and the deficiency of our system.Firstly, the author analyzes the similarities and differences between the expression of intention without receiving and the expression of will without receiving, and then analyzes the legal acts of the so-called expression of no intention, observes, analyzes and summarizes the value orientation of the three in explaining the problem.On the basis of drawing lessons from some foreign legislative examples, this paper gives the reasons why we can adopt the legislative model of "unified regulation" and "general stipulation" in the legislation of civil code of our country.The third chapter discusses how to construct the meaning expression interpretation system.First of all, it summarizes the summary of the article; secondly, it puts forward three kinds of legislative meaning expression interpretation principles and specific method rules, which are more instructive to judicial practice; finally, in order to prevent these rules from conflicting when applied,This paper also gives the corresponding order between various principles and rules.At the same time, the author also explains the supplementary interpretation and the revised interpretation.In the last part, the author gives the expectation of the legislation in the future.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.6

【相似文献】