纯粹经济损失问题中德比较研究

发布时间：2018-05-20 16:28

本文选题：纯粹经济损失 + 合同责任　；参考：《中国青年政治学院》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：纯粹经济损失是指非基于人身（生命、身体、健康、自由和其他人格权）或者财产（有形的或者无形的资产）受侵害而造成的损失，它一直是比较法上的热点问题。纯粹经济损失一般在合同责任下能够获得赔偿，但在侵权法领域能否获赔则因国情和法律制度的不同而有所差异。本文尝试对德国和我国台湾地区的形成的纯粹经济损失赔偿制度进行分析，总结其各自具有的特点及这些赔偿制度背后的政策考量因素，进而对我国纯粹经济损失赔偿制度的建构与完善进行探讨，希望能对纯粹经济损失理论与制度在我国的发展略尽微薄之力。本文首先导入现实生活中常见的纯粹经济损失案型，使人们对纯粹经济损失有初步的了解，并简单介绍了学界对纯粹经济损失的界定和分类，以及其他国家和地区目前对纯粹经济损失问题所采取的责任排除原则，并就责任排除原则的依据进行了分析和探讨。文章的第二部分从比较法的角度着眼，因我国民法与德国民法渊源颇深，受其影响甚大，，他山之石，可以攻玉，研究德国法上对纯粹经济损失的救济路径，以便能为我国对相关问题的处理提供借鉴。德国侵权责任法囿于法益保护范围的狭窄，故对纯粹经济损失保护不周，于是在司法实务中，则采用扩大合同责任的适用范围，为纯粹经济损失提供救济。此外，文中还对德国法院对纯粹经济损失案型的相关判决作了详细的评介和分析。第三部分则放眼于我国的台湾地区。具体分析了台湾地区侵权责任一般条款“民法”第184条，并结合司法实践中的案例，介绍了台湾地区对纯粹损失问题的处理模式。最后，本文着墨于我国法院在司法实务中所做出的一些纯粹经济损失案型的典型判例，如电缆案、遗嘱案等来分析和总结我国法院对此问题的态度和做法，综合我国现有对纯粹经济损失案型规制的立法例，以及结合德国法上和我国台湾地区对纯粹经济损失的救济路径，提出我国的路径选择，对我国侵权责任一般条款解释适用的同时扩大合同责任的适用范围，以资为纯粹经济损失提供救济。即在侵权法领域内采取责任限制原则，将纯粹经济损失导入合同法领域内予以规制。
[Abstract]:Pure economic loss refers to the loss caused by the infringement of persons (life, body, health, freedom and other personality rights) or property (tangible or intangible assets), which has always been a hot issue in comparative law. In general, pure economic loss can be compensated under contract liability, but whether or not compensation can be obtained in the field of tort law varies according to different national conditions and legal systems. This paper attempts to analyze the pure economic loss compensation systems formed in Germany and Taiwan, and summarize their respective characteristics and the policy considerations behind these compensation systems. Furthermore, this paper probes into the construction and perfection of the system of compensation for pure economic loss in China, hoping to do a little bit for the development of the theory and system of pure economic loss in our country. This paper first introduces the common cases of pure economic loss in real life, makes people have a preliminary understanding of pure economic loss, and briefly introduces the definition and classification of pure economic loss in academic circles. And the principle of liability exclusion adopted by other countries and regions on the issue of pure economic loss at present, and the basis of the principle of exclusion of liability is analyzed and discussed. The second part of the article from the angle of comparative law, because our country civil law and Germany civil law origin is quite deep, by its influence is very big, the other mountain stone, may attack the jade, studies the German law to pure economic loss relief path, In order to provide reference for our country to deal with the related problems. The German tort liability law is limited to the narrow scope of legal interest protection, so it is inadequate to protect the pure economic loss. Therefore, in judicial practice, the scope of application of contract liability is expanded to provide relief for pure economic loss. In addition, the paper also makes a detailed review and analysis of the relevant judgments of the German court in the case of pure economic loss. The third part focuses on the Taiwan area of our country. This paper analyzes the article 184 of the Civil Law of the general clause of tort liability in Taiwan area, and introduces the mode of dealing with the pure loss problem in Taiwan area by combining with the cases in judicial practice. Finally, this paper analyzes and summarizes the attitude and practice of Chinese courts on this issue by referring to some typical cases of pure economic loss, such as cable case, testamentary case, and so on, which have been made by Chinese courts in their judicial practice. By synthesizing the existing legislative examples of pure economic loss cases in our country, and combining with the remedies of pure economic losses in Germany and Taiwan, this paper puts forward the path choice of our country. In order to provide relief for pure economic loss, the general terms of tort liability in our country should be interpreted and applied, and the scope of application of contract liability should be expanded at the same time. In the field of tort law, the principle of limitation of liability is adopted and the pure economic loss is introduced into the field of contract law.
【学位授予单位】：中国青年政治学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D913

【参考文献】