互联互通诉权问题研究

发布时间：2018-06-06 09:20

本文选题：互联互通 + 行政诉讼　；参考：《科技与法律》2013年05期

【摘要】：从近年来我国互联互通所产生的问题来看,其研究的关键在于从"互联互通能不能起诉,有没有诉权和互联互通如何起诉,具体应当如何操作"的角度入手,根据四方当事人主体(用户、国内运营商、国外运营商、行政主管部门),将其总结为两大类问题,即行政诉讼问题与合同问题。以互联互通本质、权利与义务的边界、国际漫游合同性质、间接代理以及事实契约等观点和理论,可以分析出国内运营商与行政主管部门、用户与行政主管部门、用户与本网运营商以及用户与国外运营商之间的具体法律关系。用户在国际漫游通话质量出现瑕疵时,可以援引间接代理理论,向国外运营商以及本网运营商行使"选择权",也可以在本网运营商怠为主张债权时,以代位权向国外运营商主张权利。
[Abstract]:From the point of view of the problems arising from interconnection in China in recent years, the key to its research is to start from the angle of whether interconnection can be prosecuted, whether there is a right of action and how to sue, and how it should be operated. According to the main body of the quadripartite parties (user, domestic operator, foreign operator, administrative department), it is summarized into two kinds of problems, namely, administrative litigation problem and contract problem. Based on the viewpoints and theories of the nature of interconnection, the boundary of rights and obligations, the nature of international roaming contracts, indirect agents and factual contracts, it can be analyzed that domestic operators and administrative departments, users and administrative departments, The specific legal relationship between the user and the network operator and between the user and the foreign operator. When the quality of international roaming calls is defective, the user may invoke the indirect agent theory to exercise the "option" to foreign operators and network operators, or when the network operators lags behind in claiming claims, To the right of subrogation to foreign operators claim rights.
【作者单位】：北京邮电大学;
【分类号】：D922.296;D923.6

【参考文献】