股权转让中的公司财产质量瑕疵责任研究

发布时间：2018-06-24 20:59

本文选题：出资瑕疵 + 股权转让　；参考：《西南政法大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着公司法制度的完善与成熟，法人财产权与股权的区分已无争议。尽管如此，在股权转让的交易活动中，当事人往往会在转让协议中约定公司财产的质量担保，这一条款在法院的裁判活动中，却往往被法院以公司财产权独立于股权被判无效。本文将引入三九啤酒厂的案例，借以说明股权受让方在受让股权后，发现公司财产存在严重的质量瑕疵时应该如何追究转让方或公司出资者的责任。全文共分为四个部分。第一部分是基本案情介绍及案例争议焦点，详细介绍了案例中复杂的法律关系及两级法院对该纠纷的裁判结果，重点介绍了两级法院就案例中的股权与法人财产权的争议观点。第二部分是与系争案件相关的基本理论，是对案件展开分析的理论基础。该部分一方面介绍了我国公司法关于实物出资的适格性标准及出资瑕疵的界定和责任的承担；另一方面介绍了股权转让中当事人关于公司财产质量瑕疵担保的意思自治条款是否有效，如果当事人未在股权转让协议中约定公司财产质量担保，，是否应该准用合同法的质量瑕疵担保准则，同时引入德国法对于此种情况的规定予以借鉴。第三部分是案例分析，这是本文的重点部分。该部分是先从出资瑕疵角度讨论公司原始股东的责任，分别从法律依据、适格的当事人、诉讼时效三个要件阐述了公司原始股东对于出资实物的质量瑕疵应该承担的责任。然后是从质量瑕疵角度讨论股权转让方的责任，分别从法律依据、适格的当事人、诉讼时效三个要件阐述了股权转让方应该承担的公司财产质量瑕疵担保责任。第四部分是本案的启示。该部分分别介绍了完善实物出资制度和股权转让制度的建议。
[Abstract]:With the perfection and maturity of company law system, the distinction between legal person's property right and stock right has become undisputed. However, in the transaction of equity transfer, the parties often agree on the guarantee of the quality of the company's property in the transfer agreement. However, in the court's adjudication, this clause is often ruled invalid by the court on the basis of the independence of the company's property right from the equity. This article will introduce the case of 39 breweries to explain how the transferor or the company's investors should be held responsible when the company finds that there are serious defects in the quality of the company's property after the transfer of the equity. The full text is divided into four parts. The first part is the introduction of the basic case and the focus of the case dispute. It introduces the complicated legal relationship in the case and the judgment result of the two levels of court on the dispute of the right of ownership and the property right of the legal person in the case. The second part is the basic theory related to the dispute case, which is the theoretical basis of the case analysis. On the one hand, this part introduces the qualification standard and the definition and responsibility of the defect of the capital contribution in the company law of our country; On the other hand, it introduces whether the autonomy clause of the party concerned about the guarantee of the company's property quality defects is effective in the equity transfer, if the parties do not agree on the guarantee of the company's property quality in the equity transfer agreement, Whether the warranty criterion of quality defects in contract law should be applied, and the German law should be used for reference. The third part is the case analysis, which is the key part of this paper. This part discusses the responsibility of the original shareholders of the company from the point of view of the defect of capital contribution, respectively from the legal basis, the appropriate parties, the statute of limitations of the three elements of the original shareholders of the company for the quality of the defect in kind of contribution should bear the responsibility. Then it discusses the responsibility of the equity transferor from the point of view of the quality defect, respectively from the legal basis, the appropriate party, the limitation of action three elements elaborated the equity transferor should bear the company property quality defect guarantee responsibility. The fourth part is the enlightenment of the case. This part introduces the suggestions of perfecting the real-object investment system and the equity transfer system respectively.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【参考文献】