环境行政主体行政法律责任实现机制的研究
本文选题:环境行政主体 + 环境行政责任 ; 参考:《兰州大学》2011年硕士论文
【摘要】:环境法律责任包括环境刑事责任、环境民事责任以及环境行政责任这三种责任类型。其中,环境行政责任又可以分为环境行政主体的行政责任、环境行政相对人的行政责任和国家公务员的行政责任。本文之所以特别强调环境行政主体行政法律责任,原因在于,在现今频发的环境事件当中,有相当数量的事件是因为环境行政主体未履行或未及时履行所致。实践中,环境行政不作为、环境行政不有效作为、环境行政滥作为现象比比皆是,即设的环境法律法规得不到有效实现,环境行政主体行政法律责任的实现几乎虚置。怎样扭转这一不利现象?怎样使环境行政主体行政法律责任能够得到有效的实现?本文主要围绕这些问题展开。通过介绍研究背景,找出本文探讨问题的出发点。然后从五个方面对此问题做详细的研究。首先,介绍了环境行政主体行政法律责任的基本理论知识,借以理清各个概念之间的逻辑关系,以便于后文的顺利进行。在第二章,主要归纳了环境行政责任主体行政法律责任实现的现行途径,重点介绍了环境行政处罚。接着,在第三章里,针对现行的途径,分析环境行政主体行政责任实现不能的表现与原因。其中,既有体制层面的,也有立法层面的。第四章,针对环境行政主体行政法律责任实现不能的状况提出科学合理的对策建议。主要从培养责任行政意识、道德辅助、进行政府绩效改革、体制改革等角度展开论述,以期能够有效遏制或者消除不利于环境行政主体行政法律责任实现的因素,为其有效实现提供一定的理论和实践支持。最后是结论部分。为了更好地进行阐述,本文采用了比较研究、历史考察和逻辑推理的、语义注释等方法。
[Abstract]:Environmental legal liability includes environmental criminal liability, environmental civil liability and environmental administrative liability. Among them, the environmental administrative responsibility can be divided into the administrative responsibility of the environmental administrative subject, the administrative responsibility of the environmental administrative counterpart and the administrative responsibility of the state civil servant. The reason why this paper emphasizes the administrative legal responsibility of environmental administrative subject is that, among the frequent environmental events nowadays, a considerable number of events are caused by the failure or failure of the environmental administrative subject to perform in time. In practice, environmental administrative omission, environmental administrative ineffectiveness, environmental administrative abuse phenomenon abound, that is, the environmental laws and regulations can not be effectively realized, the realization of the environmental administrative subject's administrative legal responsibility is almost empty. How to reverse this adverse phenomenon? How to make the environmental administrative subject administrative legal responsibility can be effectively realized? This paper focuses on these problems. By introducing the research background, we find out the starting point of this paper. Then from five aspects to do a detailed study of this problem. First of all, it introduces the basic theoretical knowledge of the administrative legal responsibility of the environmental administrative subject, in order to clarify the logical relationship between the various concepts, so as to facilitate the smooth progress of the following articles. In the second chapter, the author summarizes the current ways of realizing the administrative legal responsibility of the subject of environmental administrative responsibility, and focuses on the introduction of environmental administrative punishment. Then, in the third chapter, in view of the current way, analyzes the performance and the reason of the administrative responsibility of the environmental administrative subject can not be realized. Among them, there are both institutional level and legislative level. In the fourth chapter, the author puts forward scientific and reasonable countermeasures against the situation that the administrative legal responsibility of the environmental administrative subject cannot be realized. Mainly from the angle of cultivating responsibility administrative consciousness, moral assistance, government performance reform, system reform and so on, in order to effectively contain or eliminate the factors that are not conducive to the realization of environmental administrative subject administrative legal responsibility. To provide some theoretical and practical support for its effective implementation. The last part is the conclusion. In order to better explain, this paper adopts the methods of comparative study, historical investigation and logical reasoning, semantic annotation and so on.
【学位授予单位】:兰州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D922.6;D922.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王晓莉,陈勇;论行政责任实现机制(上)——行政责任的评价[J];北京市政法管理干部学院学报;2003年03期
2 张梓太;中国环境行政诉讼之困境与对策分析[J];法学评论;2003年05期
3 李挚萍;略论政府在环境保护中的主导地位[J];法学评论;1999年03期
4 林丽;;关于环境行政公益诉讼的法律思考[J];河北法学;2007年08期
5 张建伟;;完善政府环境责任的若干思考[J];河北法学;2008年03期
6 刘国军;环境行政处罚中存在的问题与对策[J];环境保护;1999年04期
7 朴光洙;浅谈环境行政赔偿制度[J];环境保护;1995年05期
8 董峰,陈忠琪,郭霞普;浅析破产重组企业环境行政责任[J];环境导报;1997年05期
9 王明远;环境行政程序法论[J];环境导报;1999年02期
10 李景群;中国环境管理行政机构设置分析[J];中国环境管理干部学院学报;2000年02期
相关硕士学位论文 前7条
1 宋杨;我国环境行政主体研究[D];东北林业大学;2006年
2 段海明;环境行政不作为的法律探讨[D];东北林业大学;2006年
3 徐伟学;行政追偿制度研究[D];中国政法大学;2007年
4 吴凯凯;环境执法人员行政责任内部追究机制研究[D];中国政法大学;2007年
5 万里;环境法律责任研究[D];昆明理工大学;2008年
6 王小萍;论环境行政主体的外部行政责任[D];中国政法大学;2009年
7 宋晓玲;行政法律责任有效实现问题研究[D];兰州大学;2010年
,本文编号:1892032
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/huanjingziyuanfa/1892032.html