浙江省林权争议调处制度研究
发布时间：2018-09-12 05:25
【摘要】： 在承包经营权物权化和林权改革的制度背景下,林权争议呈现出类型多样化和民事化的趋势。笔者通过对案例的研析,认为林权争议在法律上可解构为民事和行政两种不同类型的法律纠纷。根据争议的具体情况,林权争议的调处应当分阶段分别适用不同的调处方法和法律程序。而目前的林权争议调处制度在理论和实践上都无法简明地解决这一难题。笔者在浙江省的制度范围内用主体、依据、程序和方法四个层面展开论述调处制度,并运用案例研析的方法,分析调处制度存在的困境和症结,具体的问题包括调处主体独立性和专业性的缺失、调处程序的不规范,以及调处裁决法律适用上困惑。通过经验判断和比较,笔者认为症结在于目前调处主体的权威性和专业性无法合理运用调处方法。通过分析制度调整的可能性和方法,笔者从主体、程序、和法律适用上提出了一些建议,并将解决问题的关键确定于调处主体上,同时论证了调处主体层级改变的可能性。结语处笔者认为应审慎观察林权改革的利弊,及其给调处工作带来的影响。
[Abstract]:Under the background of real right of contract management right and reform of forest property right, the dispute of forest right presents the trend of diversification and civil. Based on the analysis of cases, the author thinks that forest property disputes can be deconstructed into two different types of legal disputes: civil and administrative. According to the specific situation of the dispute, different methods and legal procedures should be applied to the mediation of forest right dispute in stages. However, the current mediation system of forest right dispute can not solve this problem simply in theory and practice. In the system scope of Zhejiang Province, the author discusses the system of mediation from four levels: subject, basis, procedure and method, and analyzes the dilemma and crux of the system of mediation and treatment by using the method of case study. The specific problems include the lack of independence and professionalism of the subject, the nonstandard procedure of mediation, and the confusion of the application of the mediation and adjudication law. Through empirical judgment and comparison, the author thinks that the crux of the problem lies in the fact that the authority and professionalism of the subject of mediation cannot reasonably apply the method of mediation at present. By analyzing the possibility and method of system adjustment, the author puts forward some suggestions from subject, procedure, and application of law, and determines the key to solve the problem on the subject of mediation. At the same time, it demonstrates the possibility of the change of subject level. The author thinks that we should carefully observe the advantages and disadvantages of forest property right reform and its influence on the mediation work.
【学位授予单位】：浙江农林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D922.63;D922.1;F326.2
本文编号：2238036
[Abstract]:Under the background of real right of contract management right and reform of forest property right, the dispute of forest right presents the trend of diversification and civil. Based on the analysis of cases, the author thinks that forest property disputes can be deconstructed into two different types of legal disputes: civil and administrative. According to the specific situation of the dispute, different methods and legal procedures should be applied to the mediation of forest right dispute in stages. However, the current mediation system of forest right dispute can not solve this problem simply in theory and practice. In the system scope of Zhejiang Province, the author discusses the system of mediation from four levels: subject, basis, procedure and method, and analyzes the dilemma and crux of the system of mediation and treatment by using the method of case study. The specific problems include the lack of independence and professionalism of the subject, the nonstandard procedure of mediation, and the confusion of the application of the mediation and adjudication law. Through empirical judgment and comparison, the author thinks that the crux of the problem lies in the fact that the authority and professionalism of the subject of mediation cannot reasonably apply the method of mediation at present. By analyzing the possibility and method of system adjustment, the author puts forward some suggestions from subject, procedure, and application of law, and determines the key to solve the problem on the subject of mediation. At the same time, it demonstrates the possibility of the change of subject level. The author thinks that we should carefully observe the advantages and disadvantages of forest property right reform and its influence on the mediation work.
【学位授予单位】：浙江农林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D922.63;D922.1;F326.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前5条
1 周伯煌;;林权争议中的行政裁决方法研究[J];求索;2010年09期
2 周伯煌;雷小珍;;林权争议中的行政调解方法探析[J];行政与法;2009年01期
3 孙笑侠;法律程序设计的若干法理——怎样给行政行为设计正当的程序[J];政治与法律;1998年04期
4 陈永富,周伯煌,张慧;浙江省山林权属纠纷现状及对策研究[J];浙江林业科技;2003年02期
5 周伯煌;宣裕方;余玉豹;;林权争议的参与式调解方法[J];浙江林学院学报;2007年04期
，本文编号：2238036
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/huanjingziyuanfa/2238036.html
