当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 环境法论文 >

环境诉讼原告适格问题研究

发布时间:2018-12-21 09:42
【摘要】: 传统诉讼法理论认为,只有自己的合法权益受到违法行为直接侵害的人,才具备起诉的资格。这种标准被称为直接利害关系原则。根据这一原则,我国的民事诉讼法及行政诉讼法对公民个人的原告资格作了严格的限制。并且,我国法律是不承认自然物的诉讼主体资格的。本文通过对环境诉讼主体制度的发展情况的分析,以及国内外立法和实践现状的对比,提出了在我国应该完善公民个人和相关组织的诉讼权利,并将原告范围扩大,赋予自然物和后代人诉讼资格的建议。
[Abstract]:The theory of traditional procedural law holds that only those whose legitimate rights and interests are directly infringed by illegal acts have the qualification to sue. This standard is called the principle of direct interest. According to this principle, the civil procedure law and administrative procedure law of our country make strict restriction on the plaintiff qualification of individual citizen. Moreover, the law of our country does not recognize the qualification of the subject of litigation of natural things. Based on the analysis of the development of the subject system of environmental litigation and the comparison of legislation and practice at home and abroad, this paper puts forward that the litigation rights of individual citizens and related organizations should be perfected in our country, and the scope of plaintiff should be expanded. A proposal to grant legal status to natural objects and future generations.
【学位授予单位】:吉林大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2008
【分类号】:D922.68;D925.1

【引证文献】

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 孔曙光;“动物权利论”批判[D];中国海洋大学;2012年



本文编号:2388738

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/huanjingziyuanfa/2388738.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户77eaf***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com