法律是如何被“架空”的——“限塑令”分析的法律经济学进路
发布时间：2019-02-13 19:53
【摘要】："限塑令"的出台体现了治理"白色污染"的需要,然而,它忽略了社会规范的作用,难以获得公众的信仰,以致在实施过程中步履维艰。"限塑令"提高了执法成本、增加了交易费用,并为寻租提供了条件,面临被"架空"的命运。通过行政规制实现"限塑"相对于其他方式具有优越性。要实现"限塑"的目标,从目前来看,在生产环节需要对生产商征收污染税,在销售环节需要确立塑料袋押金制;从长远来看,则需要寻求环保而且低廉的替代品。对"限塑令"的分析提供了法律如何避免被"架空"的启示:应当充分关注社会规范,法律特别是控制有害行为的法律必须进行成本一收益分析,重视对意识形态的投入,从而确保一部法律能够增进社会福利。
[Abstract]:The introduction of the "plastic restraint order" reflects the need to control "white pollution", but it ignores the role of social norms and is difficult to gain public belief, making it difficult to carry out the process. " Plastic restriction increases the cost of law enforcement, increases transaction costs, and provides conditions for rent-seeking, and faces the fate of being "elevated". Through administrative regulation to achieve "plastic limit" relative to other ways have advantages. In order to achieve the goal of "plastic restraint", pollution tax should be levied on producers in the production link, plastic bag deposit should be established in the sales link, and environmentally friendly and inexpensive alternatives should be sought in the long run. The analysis of "limited plastic order" provides the enlightenment of how the law can avoid being "elevated": we should pay full attention to social norms, and the law, especially the law of controlling harmful behavior, must carry out cost-benefit analysis and attach importance to the input of ideology. Thus ensuring that a law promotes social welfare.
【分类号】：D922.6
[Abstract]:The introduction of the "plastic restraint order" reflects the need to control "white pollution", but it ignores the role of social norms and is difficult to gain public belief, making it difficult to carry out the process. " Plastic restriction increases the cost of law enforcement, increases transaction costs, and provides conditions for rent-seeking, and faces the fate of being "elevated". Through administrative regulation to achieve "plastic limit" relative to other ways have advantages. In order to achieve the goal of "plastic restraint", pollution tax should be levied on producers in the production link, plastic bag deposit should be established in the sales link, and environmentally friendly and inexpensive alternatives should be sought in the long run. The analysis of "limited plastic order" provides the enlightenment of how the law can avoid being "elevated": we should pay full attention to social norms, and the law, especially the law of controlling harmful behavior, must carry out cost-benefit analysis and attach importance to the input of ideology. Thus ensuring that a law promotes social welfare.
【分类号】：D922.6
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 孙国华;;再论法的和谐价值[J];中共中央党校学报;2010年01期
2 王正成;;谈新时期事业单位思想政治工作“以人为本”的实现[J];黑龙江科技信息;2010年04期
3 杨胜英;;当今顶级“女权国家”[J];决策与信息;2010年03期
4 肖军;;新时期行政法学研究重点的调整与展开[J];湖南师范大学社会科学学报;2010年01期
5 魏治勋;王常青;;社会规范司法适用中的“奥斯丁困境”及其消解[J];法学论坛;2010年01期
6 付畅一;;本能与思想政治工作[J];湖北社会科学;2010年01期
7 汪永涛;;农村纠纷逻辑的转变[J];长春市委党校学报;2010年01期
8 王春林;;农民工犯罪文化解读[J];广东农业科学;2010年01期
9 徐忠明;;明清时期的“依法裁判”:一个伪问题?[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2010年01期
10 张楠;;法治视角下的人格体社会[J];法制与社会;2010年01期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 杨晔;;立足科学发展观,优化上海创业环境[A];纪念会计改革与开放30年暨上海市会计学会成立30周年专辑[C];2009年
2 yなば，
本文编号：2421801
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/huanjingziyuanfa/2421801.html
