无意思联络环境共同侵权责任研究
发布时间：2019-03-20 12:48
【摘要】：随着我国侵权行为立法的加快以及环境污染问题的日益严重,关于环境侵权行为的探讨也在进一步深化。理论界对无意思联络环境共同侵权没有统一的概念,究竟该种侵权行为是否属于共同侵权的范畴,其归责原则如何确定,行为人的责任如何分配等问题引发了学者们的激烈讨论。本文通过对比民法理论界对无意思联络数人侵权的定义,对无意思联络环境共同侵权的概念做出解释,并对无意思联络环境侵权行为的类型进行阐述,理清其责任的分配原则。 本文从分析无意思联络环境共同侵权行为的概念并在其相关概念的比较中来分析其特征入手,对无意思联络环境共同侵权的类型进行探析,分别从理论上和国内立法模式上进行细致的分类,大体分为四种不同类型,其对应的责任类型也不相同。在分析国内外关于环境侵权的归责原则的同时,总结出我国无意思联络环境共同侵权责任的归责原则。文章后半部分对无意思联络环境共同侵权责任的承担进行阐述。最后探析如何完善无意思联络环境共同侵权责任 本文的主要观点为无意思联络环境共同侵权是一种区别于共同侵权的侵权行为,不属于狭义的共同侵权的范畴,其责任的承担方式依据侵权行为的类型不同有按份责任和连带责任之分。责任的社会化将逐步成为弥补环境侵权中受害人损失的重要途径。
[Abstract]:With the quickening of our country's tort legislation and the increasingly serious problem of environmental pollution, the discussion on environmental tort is deepening. There is no unified concept of joint tort in the theory field, whether this kind of tort belongs to the category of joint tort, and how to determine the principle of imputation. The problem of how to distribute the responsibility of the actor has aroused intense discussion among scholars. This paper explains the concept of joint tort in the environment of senseless contact by comparing the definition of tort of several persons with no intention in civil law, and expounds the types of tort in the environment of unintentional contact and clarifies the principle of distribution of responsibility. This article starts with the analysis of the concept of joint tort in the environment of unintentional contact and the comparison of its related concepts to analyze its characteristics, and probes into the types of joint tort in the environment of unintentional contact. It is divided into four different types according to the theoretical and domestic legislative models, and the corresponding liability types are also different. Based on the analysis of domestic and foreign imputation principles of environmental tort, this paper sums up the liability imputation principle of joint tort liability in our country with no intention to contact the environment. The second half of the article describes the joint tort liability of the meaningless contact environment. Finally, this paper analyzes how to improve the joint tort liability of the meaningless contact environment. The main point of this paper is that the joint tort of the unintentional contact environment is a kind of tort which is different from the joint tort, and does not belong to the narrow sense of the category of joint tort. According to the different types of tort, the liability is divided into part liability and joint and several liability. The socialization of liability will gradually become an important way to make up for the loss of victims in environmental tort.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.68;D923
本文编号：2444233
[Abstract]:With the quickening of our country's tort legislation and the increasingly serious problem of environmental pollution, the discussion on environmental tort is deepening. There is no unified concept of joint tort in the theory field, whether this kind of tort belongs to the category of joint tort, and how to determine the principle of imputation. The problem of how to distribute the responsibility of the actor has aroused intense discussion among scholars. This paper explains the concept of joint tort in the environment of senseless contact by comparing the definition of tort of several persons with no intention in civil law, and expounds the types of tort in the environment of unintentional contact and clarifies the principle of distribution of responsibility. This article starts with the analysis of the concept of joint tort in the environment of unintentional contact and the comparison of its related concepts to analyze its characteristics, and probes into the types of joint tort in the environment of unintentional contact. It is divided into four different types according to the theoretical and domestic legislative models, and the corresponding liability types are also different. Based on the analysis of domestic and foreign imputation principles of environmental tort, this paper sums up the liability imputation principle of joint tort liability in our country with no intention to contact the environment. The second half of the article describes the joint tort liability of the meaningless contact environment. Finally, this paper analyzes how to improve the joint tort liability of the meaningless contact environment. The main point of this paper is that the joint tort of the unintentional contact environment is a kind of tort which is different from the joint tort, and does not belong to the narrow sense of the category of joint tort. According to the different types of tort, the liability is divided into part liability and joint and several liability. The socialization of liability will gradually become an important way to make up for the loss of victims in environmental tort.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.68;D923
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 王燕;论环境共同侵权的民事救济[J];前沿;2004年12期
2 刘生亮,许炜;试论无意思联络的共同侵权行为——兼评两个侵权行为法草案的规定[J];黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报;2003年03期
3 张梓太;张乾红;;我国环境侵权责任保险制度之构建[J];法学研究;2006年03期
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 郝慧;环境侵权损害赔偿社会化研究[D];福州大学;2006年
2 卢彩荣;论无意思联络的数人侵权[D];山东大学;2005年
3 程伯仕;环境侵权民事责任与民事救济研究[D];昆明理工大学;2006年
，本文编号：2444233
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/huanjingziyuanfa/2444233.html
