环境公益诉讼的理论基础探究

发布时间：2019-03-20 19:47

【摘要】：环境不可能成为权利的对象,环境权论和公共信托理论都无法为环境公益诉讼提供理论支撑。多人利益意义上的环境公益诉讼以公民财产权、人身权等为根据,无须再虚构其他的理论根据。私人检察总长理论、私人实施法律理论是国家论、权力论,这种理论和我国法律中的公民检举权都以"积极公民"的存在为前提。"积极公民"存在于个体与利益共同体关系中。国家、民族、自然环境决定的特定区域中的人的集合等都构成一个共同体。共同体成员对共同体的责任是公民担当"私人总检察长"、公益起诉人的理由。集体利益环境诉讼的理论基础是作为环境共同体成员的公民对共同的环境利益的责任。多人利益环境诉讼实际上是私益诉讼,只有集体公益的环境诉讼才是需要我们努力建设的环境公益诉讼。
[Abstract]:Environment can not be the object of right. Neither environmental right theory nor public trust theory can provide theoretical support for environmental public interest litigation. The environmental public interest litigation in the sense of multi-person interests is based on citizen's property right, personal right and so on, and there is no need to make up other theoretical basis. The theory of private attorney-general and the theory of private enforcement law are the theory of state and power. Both this theory and the right of civil prosecution in Chinese law are based on the existence of "active citizen". " Active citizens "exist in the relationship between the individual and the community of interests." The collection of people in a particular region determined by the state, nation, and natural environment, etc., constitutes a community. The responsibility of the members of the Community to the Community is for citizens to act as "Private Attorney-General", as a reason for the public prosecutor. The theoretical basis of environmental litigation for collective interests is the responsibility of citizens as members of the environmental community for common environmental interests. Environmental litigation of multi-person interests is actually private interest litigation, only environmental litigation of collective public interest is the environmental public interest lawsuit that needs us to build hard.
【作者单位】：中国海洋大学法政学院;
【基金】：中华环保联合会“环境公益诉讼立法调研项目基础性研究”项目的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D912.6;D915.1

【相似文献】