国家与婚姻:婚姻自由的宪法之维

发布时间：2018-04-09 12:06

本文选题：婚姻自由　切入点：结婚自由　出处：《河北法学》2006年12期

【摘要】：作为宪法基本权利的婚姻自由,是指婚姻当事人享有自主地决定自己婚姻的权利,免受国家的非法干预与侵犯。婚姻当事人按照法律的规定,有权基于本人的意志,自主自愿地决定自己的婚姻问题,既不受国家的强迫、限制或其他方式的影响,也不受第三人的干涉和强制。我国法律规范中限制公民结婚和离婚的某些规定,与宪法婚姻自由基本权利是相冲突的,国家对婚姻自由限制只能是在宪法精神下基于合理的、正当的理由且只能由法律予以规定。婚姻自由是否可以包括同性婚姻近年来被少数群体呼吁,其法律理论需要从宪法平等的层面进行探讨。同性婚姻的法理学源于宪法平等而非婚姻法,即性的平等而非男女平等,同性婚姻如果需要国家的保护,首先需要对宪法平等权作扩张的解释,然后才有可能进入由法律规范调整的讨论视角。
[Abstract]:As the basic constitutional right, the marriage freedom refers to the right of the parties to marriage to decide their own marriage independently and from the illegal interference and infringement of the state.In accordance with the provisions of the law, the parties to a marriage have the right to decide their own marital problems voluntarily and independently on the basis of their own will, neither by the coercion, restriction or other means of the state, nor by the interference and coercion of the third party.Some provisions in the legal norms of our country that restrict the marriage and divorce of citizens are in conflict with the basic right of constitutional freedom of marriage, and the restriction of freedom of marriage by the state can only be based on the reasonableness in the spirit of the Constitution.Justified reasons can only be prescribed by law.Whether the freedom of marriage can include same-sex marriage has been called upon by minority groups in recent years, and its legal theory needs to be discussed from the perspective of constitutional equality.The jurisprudence of same-sex marriage originates from constitutional equality rather than marriage law, that is, equality of sex rather than equality of men and women. If same-sex marriage needs the protection of the state, it needs to expend the right of constitutional equality first.Then it is possible to enter the perspective of discussion adjusted by legal norms.
【作者单位】：四川大学法学院
【分类号】：D911;D913.9

【相似文献】