遗产继承中的特留份制度研究
发布时间：2018-11-10 22:22
【摘要】：特留份制度源于罗马法,历经时代变迁,其技术和应用日趋成熟,世界上大多数国家都以立法形式将其确定下来。其在限制遗嘱人遗嘱自由、保护特定法定继承人权益、维护家庭伦理和社会和谐上起到了重要作用。但我国遗产继承中并没有确立特留份制度,用以限制遗嘱自由的必留份对遗嘱自由的限制较宽松,近亲属继承人的继承权益保护不足,具体条文规定粗略简单、可操作性差,已经不能完全适应现代社会。通过对两大法系主要国家特留份立法进行研究,从中寻找我国遗嘱继承的可借鉴之处,同时结合我国现在国情和文化传统,将特留份制度与必留份并行,这样我国未来遗嘱自由限制制度才更切实可行。
[Abstract]:The special share system originates from Roman law, and its technology and application are maturing day by day. Most countries in the world make sure of it in the form of legislation. It plays an important role in restricting the testator's freedom of will, protecting the rights and interests of specific legal heirs and maintaining family ethics and social harmony. However, the system of special retention has not been established in the inheritance of our country, the restriction of the free will is relatively loose, the protection of the inheritance rights and interests of the heirs of the near relatives is insufficient, the specific provisions are rough and simple, and the operation is poor. It can no longer fully adapt to modern society. By studying the legislation of special retention in the main countries of the two legal systems, the author tries to find out the lessons of intestate succession in our country. At the same time, combining with the present situation and cultural tradition of our country, the system of special retention is parallel with that of mandatory. In this way, it is more feasible to restrict the freedom of wills in the future of our country.
【学位授予单位】：黑龙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.5
本文编号：2323718
[Abstract]:The special share system originates from Roman law, and its technology and application are maturing day by day. Most countries in the world make sure of it in the form of legislation. It plays an important role in restricting the testator's freedom of will, protecting the rights and interests of specific legal heirs and maintaining family ethics and social harmony. However, the system of special retention has not been established in the inheritance of our country, the restriction of the free will is relatively loose, the protection of the inheritance rights and interests of the heirs of the near relatives is insufficient, the specific provisions are rough and simple, and the operation is poor. It can no longer fully adapt to modern society. By studying the legislation of special retention in the main countries of the two legal systems, the author tries to find out the lessons of intestate succession in our country. At the same time, combining with the present situation and cultural tradition of our country, the system of special retention is parallel with that of mandatory. In this way, it is more feasible to restrict the freedom of wills in the future of our country.
【学位授予单位】：黑龙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.5
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 郭明瑞,张平华;海峡两岸继承法比较研究[J];当代法学;2004年03期
2 龙翼飞;;2005年婚姻家庭法学学术研究回顾[J];法学家;2006年01期
3 邱凤普;王莹;;我国建立特留份制度的必要性[J];法制与社会;2009年06期
4 兰艳;论建立我国的特留份制度[J];广西大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2005年03期
5 孙毅;;继承法修正中的理论变革与制度创新——对《〈继承法〉修正草案建议稿》的展开[J];北方法学;2012年05期
6 郑雨潇;;特留份制度研究[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2012年10期
7 唐觉;;《法国民法典》继承特留份机制简介[J];中国司法;2010年01期
8 李锡鹤;论民法本位[J];华东政法学院学报;2000年02期
9 余涛,张知璜;论在我国建立特留份制度的必要性[J];江西省团校学报;2003年02期
10 陈苇;罗芳;;特留份制度的比较研究——兼论对我国特留份制度的构建[J];昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版);2008年05期
，本文编号：2323718
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hyflw/2323718.html
