婚姻家庭立法的同一性原理——以婚姻家庭理念、形态与财产法律结构为中心
发布时间：2019-05-29 18:14
【摘要】：从传统到现代社会,中国人的婚姻家庭理念、形态与财产法律结构发生了巨大的变化,有关婚姻与家庭的观念与生活呈现多元的状态。婚姻不再具有在古代那样的当然的意义,但仍然被视为男女结合的主流方式;单一的宗法意蕴已经转变为传宗接代与生育乃至不生育并存;婚姻仍然具有联姻的功能,只是其重心与往昔已有根本的不同,那就是两个姻亲家庭都要服务于新建立的小家庭,但中国人内置于婚姻家庭中的人生意义追求并没有改变。不论在农村还是城市,夫妻关系都成为家庭关系的主轴,传统的家庭同居共财制为夫妻财产制所取代。夫妻内部的财产关系、与扩展家庭的关系和与双方父母的关系分别受到挑战,但传统的共同、协助、孝道以及男女平等的新传统仍然是人们尊重的价值,对此立法者应有足够的尊重。
[Abstract]:From traditional to modern society, great changes have taken place in the concept, form and legal structure of marriage and family in China, and the concept and life of marriage and family are in a pluralistic state. Marriage no longer has the same natural significance in ancient times, but it is still regarded as the mainstream way of the combination of men and women, and the single patriarchal implication has been transformed into the coexistence of inheritance and fertility and even sterility. Marriage still has the function of marriage, but its center of gravity is fundamentally different from that of the past, that is, both in-laws have to serve the newly established small families, but the pursuit of the meaning of life in marriage and family has not changed. In both rural and urban areas, marital relations have become the main axis of family relations, and the traditional family cohabitation co-financing system has been replaced by marital property system. Property relations within husband and wife, relations with extended families and relations with both parents are challenged, respectively, but traditional traditions of common, assistance, filial piety and equality between men and women are still respected values. Lawmakers should have enough respect for this.
【作者单位】： 中国政法大学;
【基金】：中国政法大学校级科研项目“中国特色亲属法的哲学基础研究”(20116058) 教育部人文社会科学2014年一般项目“新中国婚姻家庭法的历史与理论研究”(14YJA820011)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D923.9
[Abstract]:From traditional to modern society, great changes have taken place in the concept, form and legal structure of marriage and family in China, and the concept and life of marriage and family are in a pluralistic state. Marriage no longer has the same natural significance in ancient times, but it is still regarded as the mainstream way of the combination of men and women, and the single patriarchal implication has been transformed into the coexistence of inheritance and fertility and even sterility. Marriage still has the function of marriage, but its center of gravity is fundamentally different from that of the past, that is, both in-laws have to serve the newly established small families, but the pursuit of the meaning of life in marriage and family has not changed. In both rural and urban areas, marital relations have become the main axis of family relations, and the traditional family cohabitation co-financing system has been replaced by marital property system. Property relations within husband and wife, relations with extended families and relations with both parents are challenged, respectively, but traditional traditions of common, assistance, filial piety and equality between men and women are still respected values. Lawmakers should have enough respect for this.
【作者单位】： 中国政法大学;
【基金】：中国政法大学校级科研项目“中国特色亲属法的哲学基础研究”(20116058) 教育部人文社会科学2014年一般项目“新中国婚姻家庭法的历史与理论研究”(14YJA820011)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D923.9
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 卢风;;论生态文化与生态价值观[J];清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年01期
2 寺田浩明,潘健;清代民事审判与西欧近代型的法秩序[J];中外法学;1999年02期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王芳;;论审判中心主义下侦查权的司法审查机制研究[J];法制博览;2017年22期
2 刘鹏;;技术侦查疑难问题研究[J];法学杂志;2017年07期
3 艾明;;刑事诉讼法中的侦查概括条款[J];法学研究;2017年04期
4 严雪瑾;;论诱惑侦查合法性的认定标准[J];法制博览;2017年17期
5 闵丰锦;;法治的呼唤:程序法定原则再审视[J];岭南学刊;2017年03期
6 马方;吴桐;;信息化侦查的维度冲突与法律规制[J];中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版);2017年02期
7 孙皓;;论检察权配置的自缚性[J];环球法律评论;2016年06期
8 汪家宝;;审判中心主义下侦查权控权内卷化问题研究[J];西南大学学报(社会科学版);2016年06期
9 陈琛;;公安机关刑事侦查行为的可诉性研究[J];学术界;2016年11期
10 姚显森;;论疑罪从无处理权的虚悬现象及其防控机制[J];河南大学学报(社会科学版);2016年06期
【二级参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 尼尔斯·扬森;朱晓U，
本文编号：2488118
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hyflw/2488118.html
