离职后竞业禁止协议效力的判断

发布时间：2018-03-17 05:07

本文选题：竞业禁止　切入点：商业秘密　出处：《华东政法大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：随着经济的发展,社会人才的流动日益加剧,由此引起的竞业禁止纠纷也逐渐增多。然而,我国法院对竞业禁止协议的效力判断却各有不同做法,极大地影响了司法实践的统一性,也影响了竞业禁止协议所涉的雇主、雇员和公共利益的平衡。究其原因,我国立法中竞业禁止协议效力判断相关规定的缺失是导致各法院对竞业禁止协议效力判断方式不同做法的根源。由于美国的竞业禁止制度已经发展得较为完善,其在司法判例和学说中所形成的一系列规则值得我们进行研究并予以适当借鉴。因此,本文在梳理出国内司法实践中存在的问题之后,系统地分析与阐述了美国司法实践中竞业禁止协议的合理性判断标准以及效力认定方式,并针对我国立法和司法实践中的具体问题提出了相应的立法改进措施。最后,本文在现有《劳动合同法》第二十三条和第二十四条规定的基础上提出了完善现有立法的具体条文建议。本文共分为三章进行研究论证。在第一章中,本文首先对国内部分竞业禁止纠纷案件进行了详细地实证分析,并总结出国内司法实践在竞业禁止协议的合理性考察角度、判断标准以及效力认定方式等三方面存在不足。之后本文对国内相关学理探讨及其缺陷进行了简述,并认为国内学界现有观点无法为我国相关立法和司法的改善提供足够的理论支持。由此论证我国借鉴美国判例法相关规则的必要性。第二章根据上一章的思路,引用了美国《合同法第二次重述》中的重要观点以及多个判例来对竞业禁止协议的效力判断规则进行细化,从竞业禁止协议的效力判断标准、考察对象及效力认定方式三方面详细阐述了美国司法实践中的相关规则。本章重点阐明了竞业禁止协议效力判断的三项标准,并探讨了多种可能影响协议效力的具体因素。由于这三项标准有效地平衡了竞业禁止协议所涉的各方利益,因此是我国立法改善的方向所在。第三章从我国现行立法的现状入手,得出我国立法存在重要条款缺失、效力位阶普遍不高、条文过于僵化等问题。之后本文对中美司法实践中所共同的、竞业禁止协议效力判断的根本价值追求——利益平衡进行了阐述。最后,本文结合我国司法实践中存在的问题,在借鉴美国法的基础上对我国立法完善提出了五点改进措施,并在《劳动合同法》的基础上草拟出了具体的条文建议。
[Abstract]:With the development of economy, the flow of social talents is increasing day by day, and the disputes caused by the non-competition are also increasing. However, the courts of our country judge the validity of the non-compete agreement in different ways. It greatly affects the unity of judicial practice and the balance between employers, employees and the public interest involved in non-compete agreements. The lack of relevant provisions on judging the validity of non-compete agreements in our legislation is the root cause of the different ways in which courts judge the validity of non-competition agreements. A series of rules formed in the judicial precedents and doctrines are worthy of our study and appropriate reference. Therefore, after combing out the existing problems in domestic judicial practice, This paper systematically analyzes and expounds the rationality judgment standard and the validity determination method of the non-compete agreement in the judicial practice of the United States, and puts forward the corresponding legislative improvement measures in view of the specific problems in our country's legislation and judicial practice. On the basis of the provisions of 23th and 24th articles of the Labor contract Law, this paper puts forward some specific proposals for perfecting the existing legislation. This paper is divided into three chapters for research and argumentation. In the first chapter, this paper makes a detailed empirical analysis of some non-compete dispute cases in China, and summarizes the rationality of domestic judicial practice in non-compete agreement. There are some shortcomings in three aspects, such as the criterion of judgment and the way of determining the validity. Then, this paper briefly discusses the relevant theories and their defects in China. It is concluded that the existing views of domestic academic circles cannot provide sufficient theoretical support for the improvement of relevant legislation and judicature in China, which proves the necessity for our country to draw lessons from the relevant rules of American case law. According to the train of thought in the previous chapter, the second restatement of American contract Law and several cases are cited to refine the rules of judging the validity of non-compete agreement, and to judge the validity of non-compete agreement. Three aspects of the object of investigation and the determination of effectiveness of the relevant rules in judicial practice in the United States are elaborated in detail. This chapter focuses on the three criteria for judging the validity of a non-compete agreement. As these three standards effectively balance the interests of the parties involved in the non-compete agreement, they are the direction of legislative improvement in China. The third chapter starts with the current situation of legislation in our country, and points out that there are some problems in the legislation of our country, such as the absence of important clauses, the low level of effectiveness, the inflexibility of the provisions, and so on. The basic value of judging the validity of non-competition agreement is expounded. Finally, this paper combines the problems existing in judicial practice in our country, and puts forward five measures to improve the legislation of our country on the basis of the reference of American law. On the basis of the Labor contract Law, the author draws up some specific proposals.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.52

【参考文献】