对“卢亮出走”一案的思考

发布时间：2018-04-17 21:53

本文选题：高级人才 + 人才流动法规　；参考：《中国人才》1996年09期

【摘要】：正 1996年3月29日,北京市房山区劳动争议仲裁委员会就原北京市琉璃河水泥厂新线分厂厂长卢亮单方解除劳动关系、中法合资兴发水泥有限公司违法招聘一案作出裁决,依据《劳动法》第99条、第102条及有关规定,责成被诉人卢亮和第三人北京兴发水泥有限公司分别赔偿申诉人北京市琉璃河水泥厂新线分厂直接经济损失81500元和1552348.83元。对这一裁决,卢亮和兴发水泥有限公司表示不能接受,向法院提出了申诉。截至今年7月25日本文拟就之时,北京市中级人民法院仍未就此案作出判决。卢亮出走一案是近年来人才流动争议案中很
[Abstract]:On March 29, 1996, the Beijing Fangshan District Labor dispute Arbitration Commission ruled on the case of the former director of the Beijing glazed River cement Plant New Line Plant, Lu Liang, unilaterally lifting labor relations and illegal recruitment of the Sino-French joint venture Xingfa cement Co., Ltd.According to article 99, article 102 and relevant provisions of the Labor Law, the accused person Lu Liang and the third person Beijing Xingfa cement Co., Ltd. were ordered to compensate the complainant for direct economic losses of 81500 yuan and 1552348.83 yuan respectively.The ruling, Lu Liangfa cement Co. Ltd. said unacceptable, filed a complaint to the court.As of July 25, the Beijing Municipal Intermediate people's Court had yet to issue a decision on the case.Lu's case is one of the most controversial cases concerning the flow of talent in recent years.
【分类号】：D920.5

【相似文献】