我国职业运动员的劳动者地位研究
发布时间：2018-10-24 20:06
【摘要】：近年来，随着市场经济体制改革的不断深化和我国体育事业的不断社会化，形成于旧体制下的运动员人事制度开始变革。计划经济时期，运动员都具有国家职工身份，自然而然具有劳动者的地位，，而现在，运动员的身份出现了分化，一部分运动员沿用旧编制而继续享有了国家职工地位，另一部分运动员与俱乐部签约成为了编制外职业运动员，地位模糊。同时，涉及职业运动员权利义务的争议纠纷案件越来越多。职业运动员能否具有劳动者的地位，能否受到《劳动法》等劳动法律法规的保护成为了这些案件争议的焦点，因此，探讨职业运动员的劳动者地位，具有重要的现实意义。此外，目前尚未有任何法律法规明确职业运动员的法律地位，也很少有学者进行深入的研究，因此，探讨职业运动员的劳动者地位，具有重要的理论意义。本文将以被誉为中国棋界用工第一案的曹恒廷案为切入点，分成四部分来探讨我国职业运动员的劳动者地位，第一部分主要对曹恒廷案的案情进行介绍，为文章做好铺垫；第二部分为基础概念界定，包括了职业运动员、劳动者的概念；第三部分是对我国职业运动员劳动者地位的思考，职业运动员既具有普通劳动者的一般性又有其本身的特殊性，在得出职业运动员具有劳动者地位的结论后，针对职业运动员的特殊性提出合适的建议和意见。第四部分是回到曹恒廷案，结合职业运动员的理论对曹恒廷案进行分析，以利于案件解决，以便于加强对职业运动员的法律保护。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the deepening of the reform of the market economy system and the socialization of sports in our country, the personnel system of athletes formed under the old system began to change. During the planned economy period, athletes all had the status of state workers and naturally had the status of laborers. But now, the status of athletes has been divided. Some athletes continue to enjoy the status of state workers by following the old system. Another part of the athletes and clubs signed into the establishment of outside professional athletes, fuzzy status. At the same time, there are more and more disputes involving the rights and obligations of professional athletes. Whether the professional athletes have the status of laborer and whether they can be protected by labor laws and regulations such as Labor Law have become the focus of the disputes in these cases. Therefore, it is of great practical significance to explore the laborer status of professional athletes. In addition, there are no laws and regulations to clarify the legal status of professional athletes, and few scholars do in-depth research. Therefore, it is of great theoretical significance to explore the laborer status of professional athletes. This article will be known as the first case of Chinese chess, Cao Hengting case as a breakthrough point, divided into four parts to explore the status of our professional athletes, the first part of the case of Cao Hengting mainly introduced the case, for the article to do a good job; The second part is the definition of basic concept, including the concept of professional athletes, workers; the third part is the thinking of the status of professional athletes in China, professional athletes have their own particularity as well as the generality of ordinary workers. After drawing the conclusion that professional athletes have laborer status, appropriate suggestions and opinions are put forward in view of the particularity of professional athletes. The fourth part is to return to the case of Cao Hengting, combined with the theory of professional athletes to analyze the case of Cao Hengting, in order to facilitate the settlement of the case, in order to strengthen the legal protection of professional athletes.
【学位授予单位】：广东财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：G80-05
本文编号：2292417
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the deepening of the reform of the market economy system and the socialization of sports in our country, the personnel system of athletes formed under the old system began to change. During the planned economy period, athletes all had the status of state workers and naturally had the status of laborers. But now, the status of athletes has been divided. Some athletes continue to enjoy the status of state workers by following the old system. Another part of the athletes and clubs signed into the establishment of outside professional athletes, fuzzy status. At the same time, there are more and more disputes involving the rights and obligations of professional athletes. Whether the professional athletes have the status of laborer and whether they can be protected by labor laws and regulations such as Labor Law have become the focus of the disputes in these cases. Therefore, it is of great practical significance to explore the laborer status of professional athletes. In addition, there are no laws and regulations to clarify the legal status of professional athletes, and few scholars do in-depth research. Therefore, it is of great theoretical significance to explore the laborer status of professional athletes. This article will be known as the first case of Chinese chess, Cao Hengting case as a breakthrough point, divided into four parts to explore the status of our professional athletes, the first part of the case of Cao Hengting mainly introduced the case, for the article to do a good job; The second part is the definition of basic concept, including the concept of professional athletes, workers; the third part is the thinking of the status of professional athletes in China, professional athletes have their own particularity as well as the generality of ordinary workers. After drawing the conclusion that professional athletes have laborer status, appropriate suggestions and opinions are put forward in view of the particularity of professional athletes. The fourth part is to return to the case of Cao Hengting, combined with the theory of professional athletes to analyze the case of Cao Hengting, in order to facilitate the settlement of the case, in order to strengthen the legal protection of professional athletes.
【学位授予单位】：广东财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：G80-05
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 谢增毅;;劳动关系的内涵及雇员和雇主身份之认定[J];比较法研究;2009年06期
2 侯玲玲;王全兴;;我国职业足球运动员的劳动者地位和劳动法保护[J];当代法学;2006年04期
3 吕琳;论“劳动者”主体界定之标准[J];法商研究;2005年03期
4 陈默;浅谈劳动关系与劳务关系的界定[J];中国劳动;2003年10期
5 韩新君;;职业运动员工作合同法律问题的探讨[J];天津体育学院学报;2006年03期
6 杨铁黎,张建华;职业体育市场运作模式的理论探讨─—兼谈中国职业体育市场存在的问题[J];体育与科学;2000年03期
7 娄春风;;论职业运动员的劳动者地位——以转会权为中心[J];西安体育学院学报;2010年04期
8 张恩利;;英国职业运动员的职业规范、劳动特征及其劳动权益研究[J];西安体育学院学报;2012年01期
9 侯玲玲;王全兴;;劳动法上劳动者概念之研究[J];云南大学学报(法学版);2006年01期
10 肖纪连;程莹;;体育俱乐部与职业运动员关系性质分析[J];现代商贸工业;2013年03期
本文编号：2292417
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/laodongfa/2292417.html
